You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

PLO8 tournament...

nickkaynickkay Member Posts: 171
edited August 2016 in Poker Chat
As the PLO8 player pool continues to grow, and the decent numbers turn out for the weekly league games, how about Sky introduce a weekly PLO8 tournament (Say a £500 guarantee), I'm sure the Sharks like MarkyCrash etc would be licking their lips at the prospect ;)
«134

Comments

  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016

    Hi Nickkay,

    Unusually, there are no reasons why this could not be done - its very simple & could be set up within minutes.

    Simples.

    But......

    £500 Guarantee. At a £22 buy-in, that would need 25 entrants. At £11, that would need 50 entrants. At £5 that would need 100 entrants.

    It has been tried in UKOPS before (PLO, too) & has missed it's guarantee every single time.
     
    I'm not against the logic - far from it. I just spent a month in Vegas doing nothing else except play PLO8 & PLO MTT's, at all buy-ins up to $3,000. I LOVE the game.

    Whether Sky Poker can regularly sustain a £500 Guarantee PLO8 MTT, however, is another matter.
     
    Open to thoughts & feedback.  
       
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016

    PS - How many entrants does the £5.50 PLO8 get on a Thursday night?
  • nickkaynickkay Member Posts: 171
    edited August 2016
    I hear what you're saying about the numbers, and to attract a bigger field it would have to be either a £5.50 or £11 buy in. The weekly £5.50 league game attracts around 20-25 players, so again, I hear what you're saying about the big overlay there would potentially be.

    Just think if advertised as much as the league games are, given time it may be viable. Perhaps the £500 guarantee was overly optimistic, maybe a £250 guarantee is more achievable?




  • stuarty117stuarty117 Member Posts: 1,395
    edited August 2016
    Hi tikay

    The 2 ukops plo8 i played in got 132 and 97 runners so one smashed it and other just missed. A weekly one would get 40 to 50 runners with a few sats to it would be good.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016

    Thanks nickkay.

    Lets see what others say. We have debated this many times over the last 2 or 3 years, but the facts suggest (mainly from UKOPS) that it would struggle.

    I must emphasise that it is NOT a problem to introduce new MTT's. If the logic is good enough, it can be done very quickly & easily.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament...:
    Hi tikay The 2 ukops plo8 i played in got 132 and 97 runners so one smashed it and other just missed. A weekly one would get 40 to 50 runners with a few sats to it would be good.
    Posted by stuarty117
    Well that's pretty good Stu, but they were at "peak traffic times" (seasonality). The middle of summer is another ball game entirely.

    I'm not against the idea at all, but I don't want to make a fool of myself by getting Sky Poker to do it - & they would if I asked - & then seeing it do a belly flop.
     
  • Chris_McChris_Mc Member Posts: 1,340
    edited August 2016
    What about halfing the gtd to 250 instead. Making it 5.50 not sure if it would suit 3.30.

    Works out at 45 runners and 75 runners for 3 30 i think
  • stuarty117stuarty117 Member Posts: 1,395
    edited August 2016
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament...:
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament... : Well that's pretty good Stu, but they were at "peak traffic times" (seasonality). The middle of summer is another ball game entirely. I'm not against the idea at all, but I don't want to make a fool of myself by getting Sky Poker to do it - & they would if I asked - & then seeing it do a belly flop.  
    Posted by Tikay10

    From maybe september on would be good darker nights. 

  • markycashmarkycash Member Posts: 2,837
    edited August 2016
    Thanks for the nice words Nick. I think one thing you mentioned is absolutely key here 'advertised'.

    As an example, 'Big O' aka 5 card OH8 is growing in popularity, both online and offline. If Sky threw some 'Big O' cash tables and a sprinkling of MTT's/SNG's into the mix overnight and did not mention much about it... I doubt they would attract much volume at all. In my opinion this is not because the game is not viable but down to the way in which they are implemented. The recent trial of the Headhunter games in a prime slot highlighted this too IMO.

    I personally feel that there has to be an overarching appetite on Sky's part to promote OH8 (or any other game that is not part of the current setup) and a solid plan behind that appetite for it to effectively work out. Introducing them without that appetite, and without a plan, is close to a complete waste of time. I am not moaning at Sky here at all. At the end of the day it is their business and up to them to decide where their priorities lay. I am just stating that any introduction deviating from the norm needs a plan behind it IMO.

    It therefore is no surprise to me that the UKOPS OH8 games are not meeting their guarantees as there isn't much promotion of the OH8 variant currently. It personally looks to me like the OH8 UKOPS games are added simply to offer more variety in the UKOPS series.

    Again all my personal opinion but I feel the OH8 UKOPS games, weekly £500 GTD OH8 games, and sprinkling of other OH8 games, could all very easily meet their guarantees if there was an appetite for this to happen and a plan to make it happen on Sky's side.

    Some of the things that might make this work out could be the following...

    An amendment to the current rake situation at the OH8 cash tables (it has become clear on the forum lately that the current rake set-up for the split pot game is prohibitive and putting almost, if not all regs, off playing cash games). If this was sorted then it would promote the growth of the OH8 player pool and give Sky some rake rather than close to none.

    The rewards freerolls were tweaked to include other variants but PLO8 was still excluded. I know Tikay has a different view to me on this but I feel this is such a critically important area for OH8 player pool growth. I could literally name you dozens of players who have played the game for almost 10 years who started out playing PLO8 rewards freerolls (with no prior experience of the game) on other sites, including myself. Rewards freerolls are the perfect arena for players to try out new games, risk free. This again would swell the player pool.

    Something that was very popular on several other sites were daily $1 rebuy PLO8 MTT's. For a buck or a quid people seem prepared to try these out as they could splash more chips around due to the split pot nature of the game. Sure a guarantee would help but if the other stuff was done then these would cruise past a £100 guarantee. One site I was on with a slight larger but comparable OH8 player pool had these running daily with a $500 guarantee for several years. Even when OH8 was generally played less online than it currently is. Again this would swell the player pool.

    With just these 3 measures put in place I would seriously be willing to take bets that after a couple of months...

    UKOPS OH8 MTT's would smash the current guarantee level.

    Traffic and rake revenue from OH8 cash games would rise massively (would be hard for it not to given the current levels).

    Any daily OH8 MTT's would hit their guarantees at least a very high percentage of the time. At the very least enough to make them sustainable and profitable from Sky's perspective.

    DYM OH8 traffic would at least double from current levels.

                        --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I really would be happy to bet good money on this. It just depends if this is in any way on Sky's list of priorities. It would be hard not to bring in more rake revenue for minimal effort IMO though if this was included in Sky's priorities. These wouldn't even 'need' to be all implemented at once, simply including PLO8 in the rewards freerolls once a week and seeing if OH8 DYM traffic went up at all would be a good start.

    Sorry for the book, just something I had given prior thought to.
  • markycashmarkycash Member Posts: 2,837
    edited August 2016
    Also great point by Stuarty, sattys would help as would any general promotions pushing the game variant.
  • nickkaynickkay Member Posts: 171
    edited August 2016
    Superb analysis/proposals there, +1.


  • pomfrittespomfrittes Member Posts: 2,981
    edited August 2016



      This subject has been raised many times in the past and will again add my twopennorth. About 3/4 years age a 500 Gtd ran every Friday at about 10 pm and then, with a much smaller plo8 player pool, just missed the guarantee most weeks.This Matt was a rebut with 1 add on and I have every confidence that if it were to be trialled for a month would prove popular and would have every chance of hitting the guarantee due to the increased player pool.
  • markycashmarkycash Member Posts: 2,837
    edited August 2016
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament...:
    Superb analysis/proposals there, +1.
    Posted by nickkay
    Thanks Nickkay

    I understand from Sky's perspective that they may want something more solid than a forum punter pulling numbers out their A**e with nothing to back them up. Implementing any of those measures would be very likely IMO to have a positive affect on rake revenue from the other OH8 revenue streams. I.e. introducing PLO8 into the rewards freeroll program one evening a week would likely impact on OH8 DYM traffic.

    It would be quite easy to analyse the data and assess how successful the changes were if the above example were trialed. For example simply by measuring the traffic and doing a statistical test such as a Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient to see how likely it was that any changes made were the reason for any change in the volume of DYM traffic.

    One things is for sure there is at least a healthy base of OH8 players on the site making growth of the OH8 game here a possibility.
  • pompeynicpompeynic Member Posts: 2,834
    edited August 2016
    Just a few observations, from a plopper, who has no axe to grind or particular point to make.
    The growth of the PLO8 pool of players is great, new players bring different challenges, playing styles and a welcome boost to the existing band of players. I think, and I may well be wrong, most of our merry group play the four card variant for fun and relaxation.
    We are, by nature, small ball players, we never risk losing too much and therefore, we will never win huge amounts either. The more successful have a nice steady income but they will never earn fortunes and those who lose never lose so much as they feel the need to give up altogether.
    Most of us enjoy some good-natured banter, adding to the fun and not having to bother or worry about some of the vile and unnecessary abuse that goes on elsewhere. 
    The Dym's  can get a good following, but, are very reliant on one person being around, yes they can run without him, but not in the quantity or frequency that you might think. He is the heartbeat of our group and we are very lucky to have him here. 
    I am sure that some of the "bigger" players would give PLO/PLO8 tournaments a go, you only have to see some of the large amounts splashed around in the PLO cash games to know they would, but the guarantees would have to be LARGE and the the buy-ins would also need to be LARGE and would therefore count out a large percentage of the plopper family. The Bigger players simply will not invest the time without the chance of big returns.
    Satellites may help, but some of the better players may start treating them as cash cows, as happens with the NLHE satellites now, thus upsetting some of the small ball players trying to get a chance at the "Big One." Advertising may also help, i am not sure, But Sky would have to WANT to do it, maybe becoming the home of the four card game, but only they would know the figures and , after all, they are a business and would want to make a good return on any investment. 
    I do not play the Thursday night tournaments that often, but I would make an effort to play one big weekly tournament if it was on offer, a four card Super Plop to rival the Super Roller. I would be interested to see what others think on the subject.
    Nick
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament...:
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament... : Thanks Nickkay I understand from Sky's perspective that they may want something more solid than a forum punter pulling numbers out their A**e with nothing to back them up. Implementing any of those measures would be very likely IMO to have a positive affect on rake revenue from the other OH8 revenue streams. I.e. introducing PLO8 into the rewards freeroll program one evening a week would likely impact on OH8 DYM traffic. It would be quite easy to analyse the data and assess how successful the changes were if the above example were trialed. For example simply by measuring the traffic and doing a statistical test such as a Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient to see how likely it was that any changes made were the reason for any change in the volume of DYM traffic. One things is for sure there is at least a healthy base of OH8 players on the site making growth of the OH8 game here a possibility.
    Posted by markycash
    One thing to consider here from a Business perspective here is how a business optimises it's spend.
     
    Lets make this nice & simple.

    Sky Poker have "Hero Panels" on the Home Page which are very valuable tools. They often support it with "push" messages via SMS, e-Mails, & the like.  

    Some may think these are done randomly. They are not - they are all subject to deep forensic research, more data than you can ever imagine, & "Insight".

    Now, given the cost, & value, of these "tools", where should The Business spend their money, & resource?

    On NLH related stuff, which, probably, accounts for 95%+ of all Sky Poker Margin. (That number is a pure guess, but probably ball park). In fact, across all sites, what % of Margin generated comes from O8? 1%?

    On a relatively obscure side game which, even on sites like 'Stars, has thin liquidity.
     
    How much upside is there v downside?

    I know the answer, so do you. It's never THAT clear cut, is it?   
  • pompeynicpompeynic Member Posts: 2,834
    edited August 2016
    Just out of interest, I looked at the cash tables at 11.51 am on a Wednesday, One chap is sat at four PLO tables just waiting to play, with a total of two thousand pounds sat in front of him. I have no idea if he would ever play tournaments but that is a big wedge sat around waiting to play some four card poker, and yet he has no interest in the four players playing at 25p 50p table.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament...:
    Just a few observations, from a plopper, who has no axe to grind or particular point to make. The growth of the PLO8 pool of players is great, new players bring different challenges, playing styles and a welcome boost to the existing band of players. I think, and I may well be wrong, most of our merry group play the four card variant for fun and relaxation. We are, by nature, small ball players, we never risk losing too much and therefore, we will never win huge amounts either. The more successful have a nice steady income but they will never earn fortunes and those who lose never lose so much as they feel the need to give up altogether. Most of us enjoy some good-natured banter, adding to the fun and not having to bother or worry about some of the vile and unnecessary abuse that goes on elsewhere.  The Dym's  can get a good following, but, are very reliant on one person being around, yes they can run without him, but not in the quantity or frequency that you might think. He is the heartbeat of our group and we are very lucky to have him here.  I am sure that some of the "bigger" players would give PLO/PLO8 tournaments a go, you only have to see some of the large amounts splashed around in the PLO cash games to know they would, but the guarantees would have to be LARGE and the the buy-ins would also need to be LARGE and would therefore count out a large percentage of the plopper family. The Bigger players simply will not invest the time without the chance of big returns. Satellites may help, but some of the better players may start treating them as cash cows, as happens with the NLHE satellites now, thus upsetting some of the small ball players trying to get a chance at the "Big One." Advertising may also help, i am not sure, But Sky would have to WANT to do it, maybe becoming the home of the four card game, but only they would know the figures and , after all, they are a business and would want to make a good return on any investment.  I do not play the Thursday night tournaments that often, but I would make an effort to play one big weekly tournament if it was on offer, a four card Super Plop to rival the Super Roller. I would be interested to see what others think on the subject. Nick
    Posted by pompeynic
    You are too kind Nick, & I'm blushing now.

    But.....

    The fact is, the (PLO8 DYM) liquidity is still very thin.
     
    Did you see that thread last night,
    HERE ?

    I was unavailable until 8.30pm last night, & I bet, over the evening, the number of games played was down by a good 30 to 40%. It's not just me, of course - we have 5 or 6 who make up most of the liquidity, & when they go AWOL, traffic drops off a cliff.

    I tend to like to play 30 games per session, & then de-reg everything. And then everyone else de-regs, so the games die. (Yes yes, I'm the value....). ;) 
     
    Players like Churchy, Eon, Whizzy, Ger, Alexis, Chippy, Marky, Macacgirl (now AWOL again) & you of course all make a difference.
     
    Joddy, Nomad, Chilling, jimjam, Huuuume, Helland, Eddie, these guys tend to come & go. 

    It seems like quite a list (plus all those I forgot), but it's not many, is it?

    Generally speaking, 2 or 3 players will register in advance for EVERY empty PLO8 DYM above £2.25 - Eon, Marky, me & a few others. Without those few hardcore types, the game count definitely drops quickly. 

    If you peruse the £5, £11 & £16.50 lobby when those guys are around, you will always see them in every lobby, regged for the next game, as they want to keep 5 or 6 games going.
     
    Go back 2 or 3 years, liquidity was less than a tenth of what it is now. Go forward 2 years & who knows what it may be?

    We are getting there, & it's good that players are impatient.
     
    It just takes time though.  
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament...:
    Just out of interest, I looked at the cash tables at 11.51 am on a Wednesday, One chap is sat at four PLO tables just waiting to play, with a total of two thousand pounds sat in front of him. I have no idea if he would ever play tournaments but that is a big wedge sat around waiting to play some four card poker, and yet he has no interest in the four players playing at 25p 50p table.
    Posted by pompeynic
    I very much enjoy PLO cash, I play a lot of it in Vegas & elsewhere, & I must stress I have no problem with the chap you refer to, in fact I've never met or spoken to him.

    But to see him sitting there, all alone, in every lobby, with all that cash on the table, sort of scares me, it looks like he might be waiting for an unwary sort like me.

    And of course we would have to start "heads up". Err, no ta.
      
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,367
    edited August 2016
    In Response to Re: PLO8 tournament...:
    I presume if a £500 guaranteed tourney was trialled, it would have to be on the main stage( nl holdem lobby) and left there if it was well recieved.
    Posted by chilling
    Not in the NLH lobby, no - it'd be in "ALL" though, as well as the O8 lobby.  
  • Phantom66Phantom66 Member Posts: 5,542
    edited August 2016
    wrt UKOPS, the 1st one beat the guarantee the 2nd one didnt but wasnt far off.

    They were both in the "high season" autumn/winter.

    Timing was crucial though. For the 1st one I asked on the forum and the start time was moved back from around 5 to around 7? Might be misremembering the exact times but I know it was moved to later.

    The 2nd one started in an afternoon and missed.

    For UKOPS I expect an eleven pound jobby will easily get the runners (regular ploppers and MTT beasts) if it is in the evening not the afternoon.

    The last one didnt have a PLO8 event.


Sign In or Register to comment.