You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

MTT changes & discussion thread

1141517192024

Comments

  • cpfc_2010cpfc_2010 Member Posts: 320
    edited January 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : Carrot .... Donkey
    Posted by goldon
    Daft post even by your standards.
  • LmfaoAllinLmfaoAllin Member Posts: 1,213
    edited January 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : How do you like the sound of the new and improved gold rush bounty hunter?
    Posted by Sky__James
    Hey James, obv my previous comment was meant in jest, and by no means a dig. I enjoy BH's, although also agree with others, variety is the spice of life, after all.

    I appreciate that the numbers speak for themselves though, and the contents of the lobby is a reflection of that.

    Although, due to work commitments, I only get to play a few main events a week, very much enjoyed January's promo.
    Perhaps next time, as the 7.45 struggled, the higher buy in could be the sheriff?
  • hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    edited January 2017
    You should post more, Palace.
  • chicknMeltchicknMelt Member Posts: 1,159
    edited February 2017
    any chance we can keep the daily £110bh? it seemed to get around 80 runners, which I thought was pretty good. 
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,173
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    any chance we can keep the daily £110bh? it seemed to get around 80 runners, which I thought was pretty good. 
    Posted by chicknMelt
    Morning Melty.

    I'll pass that across to James & Sam.

    Guess the answer will depend on how it performed/performs.
  • MattBatesMattBates Member Posts: 4,118
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : Morning Melty. I'll pass that across to James & Sam. Guess the answer will depend on how it performed/performs.
    Posted by Tikay10


    Did it suffer on particular days? Maybe it could be just kept on certain days say Thurs-Sat (have left Sunday out as I dont think it would work with £55bh at 7 and £110 Sunday Major at 8) if having it on every day seems to much.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,173
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : Did it suffer on particular days? Maybe it could be just kept on certain days say Thurs-Sat (have left Sunday out as I dont think it would work with £55bh at 7 and £110 Sunday Major at 8) if having it on every day seems to much.
    Posted by MattBates
    I've no idea Matt, that's why I have sent it across to Sam & James.

    I would imagine that if it is able to cover x nights per week, they'd like to run it, but if it is gonna cost a bomb in overlay, they won't.

    Anyway, it's with They Who Make The Rules now. God help us all.  
     
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,173
    edited February 2017

    I gather last night's SUMMIT, which is a £110, had an £8,000 Guarantee last night & fell well short (68 entrants = £1,200 overlay).

    On that basis, the likely answer is "no".
     

  • jubbjubb Member Posts: 100
    edited February 2017
    I realised the "mini" last night had 3k starting stack, if this is the case for all other "mini" events that would be a really good change imo ! 2k just doesnt seem enough :)
  • MattBatesMattBates Member Posts: 4,118
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    I gather last night's SUMMIT, which is a £110, had an £8,000 Guarantee last night & fell well short (68 entrants = £1,200 overlay). On that basis, the likely answer is "no".  
    Posted by Tikay10

    If it was to be done say on a Saturday would this allow more players to sat into it? Also last night there was only a LR sat with more than 1 seat guaranteed whereas for mains there is a 3pm/6pm/LR sat. The 3pm might struggle but I would of thought a 6pm or 7pm sat with a few seats guaranteed would work and help meet the guarantee.
  • Sky__JamesSky__James Member Posts: 451
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : If it was to be done say on a Saturday would this allow more players to sat into it? Also last night there was only a LR sat with more than 1 seat guaranteed whereas for mains there is a 3pm/6pm/LR sat. The 3pm might struggle but I would of thought a 6pm or 7pm sat with a few seats guaranteed would work and help meet the guarantee.
    Posted by MattBates
    You're right, it was supposed to have a Semi at 7.15pm giving 10 seats. Tuesday is the best night to have a high roller so we'll try again next week.
  • markycashmarkycash Member Posts: 2,837
    edited February 2017
    If Sky are planning on running WSOP qualifiers this year...

    Sky were very prompt in launching WSOP qualifiers last year after the schedule was released (even although the WSOP were very late in releasing the schedule).

    As the WSOP seem to have got their act together and released the full schedule much earlier this year, would it be possible to have some basic qualifiers as soon as possible? Running the qualifiers early may be a way to steal a march on any competitors running similar qualifiers (it was this that attracted me to playing more regularly on Sky last year). Also the Sky experience over there is so good so it would be nice to give as many people as possible a shot at going.
  • MattBatesMattBates Member Posts: 4,118
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    If Sky are planning on running WSOP qualifiers this year... Sky were very prompt in launching WSOP qualifiers last year after the schedule was released (even although the WSOP were very late in releasing the schedule). As the WSOP seem to have got their act together and released the full schedule much earlier this year, would it be possible to have some basic qualifiers as soon as possible? Running the qualifiers early may be a way to steal a march on any competitors running similar qualifiers (it was this that attracted me to playing more regularly on Sky last year). Also the Sky experience over there is so good so it would be nice to give as many people as possible a shot at going.
    Posted by markycash
    Early sats would be good but it's too late to get a steal on the competition!
  • Sky_SamTSky_SamT Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 984
    edited February 2017
    IF Sky are doing Vegas sats this year I imagine they will be launched at a very similar time to last year.


  • Sir-GarySir-Gary Member Posts: 1,052
    edited February 2017
    last night was bound to be bad for the poker site as premiership football was playing. I suggest a £110 buy in tournament for Tuesday and Sunday and later if they do ok add in say Thursday to have non consecutive nights etc.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,173
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    IF Sky are doing Vegas sats this year I imagine they will be launched at a very similar time to last year.
    Posted by Sky_SamT
    IF Sam is right, that's good.
  • markycashmarkycash Member Posts: 2,837
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : IF Sam is right, that's good.
    Posted by Tikay10
    Agreed, Sky were very prompt with them last year. Just itching to start this years quest :p
  • MattBatesMattBates Member Posts: 4,118
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : IF Sam is right, that's good.
    Posted by Tikay10
    I guess there is a chance he is right.....even a broken clock is correct twice a day!
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,173
    edited February 2017
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread:
    In Response to Re: MTT changes & discussion thread : I guess there is a chance he is right.....even a broken clock is correct twice a day!
    Posted by MattBates

    Sky Bet make it a pick 'em, 10/11 either way.  
  • chicknMeltchicknMelt Member Posts: 1,159
    edited February 2017
    with the £110 bh - I get that it failed to meet guarantee a few times, but a £55bh with £4k guaranteed (so requiring the same numbers) would also struggle yet the sheriff is deemed "ever popular" when it meets its 40-50 runner guarantee. 

    a £110 bh @ 7:45 with a semi at 6 and 7:15, and a 5k/6k guarantee would surely do ok? 
Sign In or Register to comment.