Hi
Q1: Are they beatable?
Q2: Where is the best place to learn about them and how best to play them?
(theres loadsa stuff on normal DYM,s but can,t find anything on turbos)
Q3 : For any DYM players - How do you adapt to playing the turbos on here with 2 min blinds and 1K starting stack
Thx
MP
Comments
1) Yes absolutely.
2) I found John O'Connor's post on sky valuable and just tweaked it.
3) Know your opponent. Regs won't call with rubbish.
Be tight, I often am in a bubble situation without playing a hand.
Know the time of day, you can be tighter earlier in the day, but later in evening you may need to loosen up.
4) Can't believe I am offering advice to a player like you, I feel like a fraud
I checked deuces cracked and saw that their admin posted that they likely wouldn't make strat vids for them as collusion is so rife they wouldn't want to promote them. That was in 2010 before stars dropped them.
If you do want to Google around, they were known as 'double or nothing' on star so try that term - or DONs
I always include rakeback etc in 'winnings' because all it is is a way of paying less rake.
And if I can break even, others must be able to beat them because I am not a great player.
Anyone here with sharkscope able to give me an uptodate % of my profit/loss on just dyms please? My graph shows me minus 416 but that isn't accurate as it doesn't include promos/rakebacks etc, or the free seats I get such as the £220? seat from forum game I just had.
6 handed I am shown as finishing 1st (which is 1-3 in dyms) in 53% of games. Include promo stuff and I am turning a profit
I have just done a search on banking transactions and I am +470 on banking transactions this year, and currently have £130 in account so £600 in profit, and that is about average (I make £100 per month on average across all my sites and that has been pretty consistent over the last 5 years).
I don't play cash games, only sngs/mtts and that should be pretty easy to track. I do bet too and make some profit from that, but I am pretty sure I am evens-ish from poker and that just about all my profit comes from promos
I have given you 20% rakeback, but I think sky is only 10%.
That is dyms only. You'd be a winner in a rakeless enviromemt. Sky's low stakes dym pools are a high rake enviromemt, unfortunately.
Red line = actual profit / loss (My scope is in $s)
Green = profit / loss + 20% RB ( though I think sky is 10%)
Blue = profit / loss if rake wasn't paid by any players
Grey = 20% rb
Maybe I am winning more at sports betting than I thought?
Hmm, is rake correct?
I play usually to 100 points. I don't go over that because there is less value and my rakeback % decreases.
102 points on the £2.25 games is 34 games. That = £8.50 rake and I get a £2.25 token which = 26.5% rakeback.
Then, I often only play when it is double points. That would be only 17 games which would be £4.25 rake which would equate to 53% rakeback.
Or am I completely wrong?
----------------
Thinking of the -£361 figure over 3165 games as a different way of calculating.
3165/34 = 93 sets of games (a set being 102 points).
That means, that 93 games are free (with the rakeback token). 93 x 2.25 = £209.25
That would put loss at roughly £152 instead. I get quite a few free tokens of £2.25 for depositing too with a code.
And forum comp prizes, such as a £110 ticket from Tikay and DTD/FSOP monthly prizes which will also show as a loss in my column but actually were free (on mtt tab, not sng though)
-----------------
Earning these points also get me into freerolls, where I have won quite a few quid, and I count this money as part of the rakeback deal.
I am not saying the SS figures are wrong, just trying to work out where my profit is coming from and which parts of SS I can use/avoid etc
Because I don't really play for fun these days. The missus and I play to grind a few pence as a way of paying for our wedding and if I am not making a profit on a certain game, I may as well avoid it
I was under the impression that grinding a few DYM's broke me even, with any wins the resulting freerolls as profit, but the above figures may prove me wrong on that
Here's with 45% rb
http://imgur.com/a/seejA
A funny thing happens with the profit excluding rake line when you have rb applied, so the one above is wrong. here is your true winnings if there was no rake, you are beating the player pool comfortably, but need a whopping 45% rakeback to break even at low stakes dyms. It's why I think they are a terrible game for new players to try out.
Here's the true zero rake graph : http://imgur.com/a/6GHvd
Scope has no way of knowing what competition entries you have won, but it can track your free roll winnings and you are up circa $440 in those. How many of those freerolls are a direct result of dym points and how many were already available - again scope can't tell you that
It might mean moving up stakes or a format change to summat with beatable rake, or some off table work in your current games.
but you might start enjoying games again
Your itm is higher in non turbo dyms, despite you playing low stakes turbos and midstakes in non turbos.
Edges are significantly lower in turbo dyms, I doubt anyone has a higher itm% in them over a decent sample.
To illustrate:-