I went on live chat on the totesport site where I have an account. They ask you for all your details as a customer and any security questions set up,then they talk to you. I asked the question"Is there any where we could find out the night before and they said,such information is only relesed in the morning. Posted by wynne1938
ok cheers wayne,i know sometimes comes out early on totepool twitter page.
Just posted this on another thread, but it's more relevant to this one. Cut and Paste below:
Vaigret suggested people adding the reasons behind their selections, to give it more weight/substance and at this stage I am OK if you want to do that, and equally OK if you don't.
It could have some short-term benefit however as we get through more and more volume, my thoughts on it are below:
I believe in results over rhetoric, as that is tangible and undeniable, but clearly we need way more volume before it's meaningful.
Think about poker. You always get people who think they know it all, and tell everyone how to play when they may be a losing player, where as, others may be understated, modest, quiet, less forthcoming etc. but are a long term winning player.
Who would you listen too? This is the same for me re my horse selectors.
Results (over an extended period of time), hold true, so people should use their considerable knowledge to strive to top the leader boards in my opinion.
The people that make the best judgement, based on their horse knowledge, should in-time turn that into NAP table/Remover Table success or else, how they are applying their knowledge, or their knowledge itself may be floored.
People on these threads clearly know a lot about horses, so this is not aimed at any individual, but knowledge needs to equal results over time or the knowledge is misplaced.
I will pay particular attention to the tables relating to GO-LIVE scenarios (Removers and NAP's), but still do add comments, however past results will take sway over comments as time progresses and we have more volume to go on.
Granted, the leader boards are meaningless at the moment, as there is no volume to go on. So comments may help.
So a note to all. You want me to stand up and take note when you place your picks, do well in the league tables. Especially the live ones.
Simples :=)
G
P.S. I am also absolutely fine with people making selections for a bit of fun too, it's my job to assess your form more than the horses in a way, and to make the appropriate choices. So input from serious and recreational punters alike, is all good.
P.P.S. Please note this is not aimed at any individual, it's just a statement that I believe results are the true judge over time. Others are probably the same as me, in as much as, I go to much more effort in my form analysis for the GO-LIVE days, so it's significant to have a separate table for live.
Comments
SYNDICATE NAP SELECTIONS AND RESULTS FOR SUNDAY 14TH 2017
AT LUDLOW: GO LIVE
1) JORDZ16
2.30 HEDLEY LAMARR PLACED
2) MAXALLY:
3) MICKYBLUE:
4) MISTY4ME
2.30: OZZY THOMAS WINNER 7-43.00: BEAU DU BRIZAIS LOSER
5) MKGUNNER:
6) PHANTOM66:
3.00: BEAU DU BRIZAIS LOSER
7) SNUFFER:
8) STAYORGO:
9) VAIGRET:
3.00 WESTERN MILLER LOSER
3.30 HESTINA LOSER
4.00 UN BEAU ROMAN LOSER
10) WYNNE1938:
11) ZADOC:
2.30: HERBERT PARK LOSER
All tables have been updated on OP.
Additional column added to see change from previous, so easy to check daily.
Congrats to MISTY4ME who heads the LIVE-ONLY leader board and to MKGUNNER who won the inaugural Weekly leader board and leads the monthly one.
Cheers,
G
P.S. Any errors, let me know.
SYNDICATE NAP SELECTIONS AND RESULTS FOR MONDAY 15TH 2017
AT WETHERBY:
1) JORDZ16
2) MAXALLY:
3) MICKYBLUE:
4) MISTY4ME
1.50: ALWAHSH
5) MKGUNNER:
6) PHANTOM66:
3.25: DUTCH ARTIST
7) SNUFFER:
3.25: ZODIAKOS
8) STAYORGO:
9) VAIGRET:
2.50 LYDIAS PLACE
10) WYNNE1938:
4.30 NEWT
11) ZADOC:
Vaigret suggested people adding the reasons behind their selections, to give it more weight/substance and at this stage I am OK if you want to do that, and equally OK if you don't.
It could have some short-term benefit however as we get through more and more volume, my thoughts on it are below:
I believe in results over rhetoric, as that is tangible and undeniable, but clearly we need way more volume before it's meaningful.
Think about poker. You always get people who think they know it all, and tell everyone how to play when they may be a losing player, where as, others may be understated, modest, quiet, less forthcoming etc. but are a long term winning player.
Who would you listen too? This is the same for me re my horse selectors.
Results (over an extended period of time), hold true, so people should use their considerable knowledge to strive to top the leader boards in my opinion.
The people that make the best judgement, based on their horse knowledge, should in-time turn that into NAP table/Remover Table success or else, how they are applying their knowledge, or their knowledge itself may be floored.
People on these threads clearly know a lot about horses, so this is not aimed at any individual, but knowledge needs to equal results over time or the knowledge is misplaced.
I will pay particular attention to the tables relating to GO-LIVE scenarios (Removers and NAP's), but still do add comments, however past results will take sway over comments as time progresses and we have more volume to go on.
Granted, the leader boards are meaningless at the moment, as there is no volume to go on. So comments may help.
So a note to all. You want me to stand up and take note when you place your picks, do well in the league tables. Especially the live ones.
Simples :=)
G
P.S. I am also absolutely fine with people making selections for a bit of fun too, it's my job to assess your form more than the horses in a way, and to make the appropriate choices. So input from serious and recreational punters alike, is all good.
P.P.S. Please note this is not aimed at any individual, it's just a statement that I believe results are the true judge over time. Others are probably the same as me, in as much as, I go to much more effort in my form analysis for the GO-LIVE days, so it's significant to have a separate table for live.