Bit worried about not having Rouge Devils in the main perm in the next, but no-one napped it and the three in the main perm were all napped by at least one person.
Also apologies to Roger if Herbert Park wins, I know you napped it, but perm cost too great and one had to go.
never in any doubt and right not to have Nicholls horse I didn't fancy it and most of the others as well. Have a feeling if trained by someone else it wouldn't have been paper fav.
In Response to Re: ** JACKPOT SYNDICATE ** IT'S A GO AT LUDLOW TODAY (SUNDAY 14TH MAY 2017) ** SEE TWO PERM STRATEGY ON OP : REGARDING 2ND LEG: (POSTED 2.29PM) Bit worried about not having Rouge Devils in the main perm in the next, but no-one napped it and the three in the main perm were all napped by at least one person. Also apologies to Roger if Herbert Park wins, I know you napped it, but perm cost too great and one had to go. GL us anyway. Cheers, G Posted by StayOrGo
Tough job you had today with horses being NAPPED & REMOVED
Get through this and we are certain to get through the next leg as the one horse we did not have has just been withdrawn - no pressure then! Posted by bearace
In Response to Re: ** JACKPOT SYNDICATE ** IT'S A GO AT LUDLOW TODAY (SUNDAY 14TH MAY 2017) ** SEE TWO PERM STRATEGY ON OP : True, assuming be get through in both perms. Posted by StayOrGo
Gutted, PERUVIEN BLEU was in other perm too. I removed WHATTHEBUTTLERSAW from perm two as well, so I could put WESTERN MILLER in as it was napped.
PERUVIAN BLEU was also removed by all but , ZADOC, SNUFFER, VAIGRET and MISTY4ME.
Well done to the above for not removing it, however the lack of a NAP for it and several having it as a removal, meant it was only in the secondary perm.
WHATTHEBUTLERSAW was my mistake, I so wanted that in both perms, but was trying to drive costs down.
This was one that got away, and tbh, it hurts. :=(
Cheers,
G
P.S. I'm sure I'll get over it. Thanks for all then input.
Ifs and buts and I'll shoulder the "blame" for napping Western Miller. I think their was other horses in 3.00 which could have been left out but ce la vie. Posted by vaigret
Not your fault Vaigret, last time we won was largely down to you, as you pointed us away from the banker in the 5th leg. I'm not pointing fingers, I'm just explaining my dilemma's based on trying to accommodate everyone as best I can.
I am more cross with myself really, for not having WHATTHEBUTLERSAW in both legs. I really wanted it in, but to reduce costs, something had to give.
That's been an unlucky horse for me. When I did the charity trophy presentations at Kempton in Feb. I had 3 big priced winners in a Lucky15, going on to WHATTHEBUTTLERSAW. It was approx. £5K if he won, but only 6th that day.
Oh well. I'm just disappointed for the team. We had such good coverage today, it was almost harder to lose than to win. :=)
Always hard when doing two perms and sorting them, just unlucky this time and always beware when Nick Williams puts up family. Lots of losers napped in 3.00 but I have strong shoulders and unlucky that the gamble on Western Miller didn't carry on from Saturday night. see my note on naps thread
Get through this and we are certain to get through the next leg as the one horse we did not have has just been withdrawn - no pressure then! Posted by bearace
So roll over very unlikely, looks like potentially a good dividend too.
Had 3 out of 4 horses in the 4th Leg and missed, and 5 out of 7 horses in the 5th Leg and missed.
Just one of those run bad days.
Well, as we know it's a mid/long term strategy, but can be tough sometimes.
I really appreciate the contributions everyone has made, didn't come off today, but if we can get coverage like this in the future, our luck may hold out.
I knew that 5th one was a tough leg, hence having five runners, I was saying as much in a previous reply to Roger.
Comments
So far so good
There are 448.64 UNITS going into LEG4 of which 22.5 are ours.
We are on the following in LEG4: (3.30pm)
PERUVIAN BLEU was also removed by all but , ZADOC, SNUFFER, VAIGRET and MISTY4ME.
Well done to the above for not removing it, however the lack of a NAP for it and several having it as a removal, meant it was only in the secondary perm.
WHATTHEBUTLERSAW was my mistake, I so wanted that in both perms, but was trying to drive costs down.
This was one that got away, and tbh, it hurts. :=(
Cheers,
G
P.S. I'm sure I'll get over it. Thanks for all then input.
I am more cross with myself really, for not having WHATTHEBUTLERSAW in both legs. I really wanted it in, but to reduce costs, something had to give.
That's been an unlucky horse for me. When I did the charity trophy presentations at Kempton in Feb. I had 3 big priced winners in a Lucky15, going on to WHATTHEBUTTLERSAW. It was approx. £5K if he won, but only 6th that day.
Oh well. I'm just disappointed for the team. We had such good coverage today, it was almost harder to lose than to win. :=)
G
Always hard when doing two perms and sorting them, just unlucky this time and always beware when Nick Williams puts up family. Lots of losers napped in 3.00 but I have strong shoulders and unlucky that the gamble on Western Miller didn't carry on from Saturday night. see my note on naps thread
It's just costs were /> £700 at that point and I felt something had to give.
Really hope we bust elsewhere now, but I can't see it.
I would probably have put some coverage bets in if going in the last, depending on which perm was still in.
All hypothetical now.
Shame.
Hi Graham all academic above now , we all missed Festive Affair so would have just had heartbreak a little later.
Chin up all, we cant win all the time
No-one napped Festive Fair and it was removed by seven of us, hence it's absence.
I don't feel like I have let the side down anymore.
Yes, would have been gutting to go out on 5th leg with such wide coverage. Cut and Pate of tote info going to last leg.
tote jackpot:
END
Had 3 out of 4 horses in the 4th Leg and missed, and 5 out of 7 horses in the 5th Leg and missed.
Just one of those run bad days.
Well, as we know it's a mid/long term strategy, but can be tough sometimes.
I really appreciate the contributions everyone has made, didn't come off today, but if we can get coverage like this in the future, our luck may hold out.
I knew that 5th one was a tough leg, hence having five runners, I was saying as much in a previous reply to Roger.
Cheers,
G