All Categories› Sports & Betting Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Vaigrets Alternative Jackpot perms

vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
edited October 2017 in Sports & Betting Chat
20/5/17


1.50: CHEMICAL CHARGE LOST
2.20: PERFECT ANGEL LOST
3.30: GALILEO GOLD LOST

REMOVERS LIST

1.50:
HAWKBILL , MINUS 5
MIDTERM, PLUS 5
MY DREAM BOAT PLUS 5

2.20:
BARRINGTON, PLUS 3
KOROPICK, PLUS 4
SIMMIE PLUS 4

2.55:
AL HAMDANY, PLUS 2
MISTER BLUE SKY NR
BUSH HOUSE PLUS 2

3.30
ACCLAIM PLUS 3

4.05
KIT MARLOWE PLUS 5
KODITIME PLUS 5
ROGUE PLUS 2
STARLIGHT MYSTERY PLUS 2

42 points scored
  

Points Scoring System:

Successfully remove a 5/1 shot or less (5 points)
Successfully remove a 11/2 to 15/2 shot (4 points)
Successfully remove a 8/1 to 11/1 shot (3 points)
Successfully remove an 12/1 shot or bigger (2 points)

If your removal wins at a latest price of 12/1 or bigger (minus 10 points)
If your removal wins at        etc etc       8/1 to 11/1    (minus 8 points)
If your removal wins at etc      etc        11/2 to 15/2   (minus 6 points)
If your removal wins at      etc etc        5/1 or less     (minus 5 points)
· Share on Twitter
«134567

Comments

  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    If you have given me support on syndicate threads thanks, if not no problem,just wont be posting on those at all.

    Good luck to you all
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    If I had the money my £540 would go on the following jackpot

    1.50

    1,3,4

    2.20

    1, 5, 8

    2.55

    2, 3, 4,5,6,8,9,11

    3.30
    4,7,9

    4.05
    2

    4.40
    1,2,3,4,6

    1080 x 0.50=£540
     
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    If I had the money my £540 would go on the following jackpot 1.50 1, 3 ,4 2.20 1, 5 , 8 2.55 2, 3, 4,5,6,8,9,11 3.30 4,7,9 4.05 2 4.40 1,2,3,4,6 1080 x 0.50=£540  
    Posted by vaigret
    so far so good
    · Share on Twitter
  • wynne1938wynne1938 Member Posts: 20,556
    edited May 2017
    Good going
    I am out of everything.

    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    Good going I am out of everything.
    Posted by wynne1938
    YES PUT THE MOCKERS ON YOU A BIT AS CHOSE THE SAME HORSES A LOT OF TIMES
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    If I had the money my £540 would go on the following jackpot 1.50 1, 3 ,4 2.20 1, 5 , 8 2.55 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6,8,9,11 3.30 4 ,7, 9 4.05 2 4.40 1,2,3,4,6 1080 x 0.50=£540  
    Posted by vaigret
    JUST got to pray PLEAD doesn't win for the virtual jackpot and no hedging
    · Share on Twitter
  • mkgunnermkgunner Member Posts: 3,032
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : JUST got to pray PLEAD doesn't win for the virtual jackpot and no hedging
    Posted by vaigret
    lots of editing there today v ;-)
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : lots of editing there today v ;-)
    Posted by mkgunner
    none at all mate I don't cheat

    Why I replied to post before third race, was expecting a comment like that
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : none at all mate I don't cheat Why I replied to post before third race, was expecting a comment like that.

    But not from you I have to say.
    Posted by vaigret
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    and if you check the whole removers scenario on Syndicate you will see bet done from everybodys removals except for Duke of Bronte
    · Share on Twitter
  • mkgunnermkgunner Member Posts: 3,032
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list :
    Posted by vaigret
    mucking around v ;-)
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    why you so attacking you are just about to win nice lot of money mine just virtual
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL IN SYNDICATE WELL DONE.
    · Share on Twitter
  • wynne1938wynne1938 Member Posts: 20,556
    edited May 2017
    Well done with your virtual selections
    · Share on Twitter
  • mkgunnermkgunner Member Posts: 3,032
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    why you so attacking you are just about to win nice lot of money mine just virtual
    Posted by vaigret
    ur reading me wrong v,was mucking,ur in real 1 aswell so money 4 u2 m8.
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    Well done with your virtual selections
    Posted by wynne1938
    not really me, perm such as the removers made it  except for the Duke instead of Andok
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : ur reading me wrong v,was mucking,ur in real 1 aswell so money 4 u2 m8.
    Posted by mkgunner
    sorry I misunderstood you ,bit sensitive at mo.

    Strange thing was the reason I put this perm on here was as I said to wynne it was what the removers came up with and it just coincided with my suggestion to Graham that perhaps we didn't always need multiple perms and multiple bankers if the crew thoughts came up with that. I thought that funny as before Chester last week that was the way he was going but he saw the light and went for multiple perms that day because others and myself thought Dihat dodgy. Having seen the light and winning he then wasn't going toleave the road to Damascus and got upset and said it would be too expensive. He also banned me because I had the audacity to come up with an idea. 

    So when the removers came up with a perm and you can check my workings out for yourself that covered the horses that we wanted to stay for 1080 at 0.50= £540 I thought I would post it on here to see if it worked. Surprise surprise it did with no hedging needed.
     
    Anyway I got chucked out and to be honest it wouldn't be fair on Graham who is doing sterling work on this for me to be involved going forward and I wish you and all the other syndicate members all the best. And lots more winnings!!!!  
    · Share on Twitter
  • mkgunnermkgunner Member Posts: 3,032
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : sorry I misunderstood you ,bit sensitive at mo. Strange thing was the reason I put this perm on here was as I said to wynne it was what the removers came up with and it just coincided with my suggestion to Graham that perhaps we didn't always need multiple perms and multiple bankers if the crew thoughts came up with that. I thought that funny as before Chester last week that was the way he was going but he saw the light and went for multiple perms that day because others and myself thought Dihat dodgy. Having seen the light and winning he then wasn't going toleave the road to Damascus and got upset and said it would be too expensive. He also banned me because I had the audacity to come up with an idea.  So when the removers came up with a perm and you can check my workings out for yourself that covered the horses that we wanted to stay for 1080 at 0.50= £540 I thought I would post it on here to see if it worked. Surprise surprise it did with no hedging needed.   Anyway I got chucked out and to be honest it wouldn't be fair on Graham who is doing sterling work on this for me to be involved going forward and I wish you and all the other syndicate members all the best. And lots more winnings!!!!  
    Posted by vaigret
    wish u more winnings 2 v,wish u and g could have sorted it but looks not to be.:-(
    · Share on Twitter
  • vaigretvaigret Member Posts: 16,380
    edited May 2017
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list:
    In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : wish u more winnings 2 v,wish u and g could have sorted it but looks not to be.:-(
    Posted by mkgunner
    he didn't give me a chance to sort it he just banned me.

    If you look at the timings of my posts and where I made them you will see I didn't even know I was under threat until he said right your banned.

    No problem anyway I will follow you all and bet on your horses in the  last race when you get their again and make just as much as I would have from my share/
    · Share on Twitter
  • StayOrGoStayOrGo Member Posts: 12,181
    edited May 2017
    Hi Vaigret.

    Just in case you don't want to post on the other thread again, I have copied my reply to your post here:

    ----------------------------------------

    OK, no problem, my misunderstanding. TY for clarifying.

    When the funds have been received from the betting account, I will transfer £20 to your account, as per the dividend. I will then make a further payment to you on 31st May for whatever the share value is (minus £5) at that time.

    Is that acceptable?

    Or I can just send you £25.55 (£20 div + £5.55 share value) now and we are square, no further dealings to be had.

    It depends if you want to be IN for any bets for the remainder of this month. Which might be a mute point if there aren't any.

    What would you prefer? Please let me know.

    Cheers,

    G

    P.S. Quite glad both RIBCHESTER AND DENAAR won, so it leaves neither of us saying/thinking, "I told you so", as that would not be showing any class. So no-one lost face here. GL for the future. I wish you all the best and I genuinely mean that.
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.