Hi Vaigret. Just in case you don't want to post on the other thread again, I have copied my reply to your post here: ---------------------------------------- OK, no problem, my misunderstanding. TY for clarifying. When the funds have been received from the betting account, I will transfer £20 to your account, as per the dividend. I will then make a further payment to you on 31st May for whatever the share value is (minus £5) at that time. Is that acceptable? Or I can just send you £25.55 ( £20 div + £5.55 share value ) now and we are square, no further dealings to be had. It depends if you want to be IN for any bets for the remainder of this month . Which might be a mute point if there aren't any. What would you prefer? Please let me know. Cheers, G P.S. Quite glad both RIBCHESTER AND DENAAR won, so it leaves neither of us saying/thinking, "I told you so", as that would not be showing any class. So no-one lost face here. GL for the future. I wish you all the best and I genuinely mean that. Posted by StayOrGo
If I had the money my £540 would go on the following jackpot 1.50 1, 3 ,4 2.20 1, 5 , 8 2.55 2, 3, 4, 5 ,6,8,9,11 3.30 4 ,7, 9 4.05 2 4.40 1,2,3, 4 ,6 1080 x 0.50=£540 Posted by vaigret
Hi Vaigret.
Similarly to be fair to you I won't post on your threads again.
However, I just wanted to say, when we GO-LIVE and do a multi-perm approach, I would be very happy for you to do a single perm alternative, as you did with Newbury.
It will be interesting to see which approach works best, over time, and you may also enjoy doing it. So I am happy for you to use the NAP's and Remover's selections to create a single perm alternative.
Like I said, I won't post here again, but if you feel like putting up an "opposing" single perm when we do our multi-perms, I won't take it the wrong way and would actually welcome it, so I can compare what would have been most effective over time.
Up to you of course, but I would be very happy for you to do that, and it would assist the syndicate.
I am sure neither of us will say "I told you so" when one way is successful and the other not. But as a comparison it could be very useful.
In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : Hi Vaigret. Similarly to be fair to you I won't post on your threads again. However, I just wanted to say, when we GO-LIVE and do a multi-perm approach, I would be very happy for you to do a single perm alternative, as you did with Newbury. It will be interesting to see which approach works best, over time, and you may also enjoy doing it. So I am happy for you to use the NAP's and Remover's selections to create a single perm alternative. Like I said, I won't post here again, but if you feel like putting up an "opposing" single perm when we do our multi-perms, I won't take it the wrong way and would actually welcome it, so I can compare what would have been most effective over time. Up to you of course, but I would be very happy for you to do that, and it would assist the syndicate. I am sure neither of us will say "I told you so" when one way is successful and the other not. But as a comparison it could be very useful. Cheers, G Posted by StayOrGo
Would love to Graham and promise wont say I told you so ,
In Response to Re: Vaigrets Daily NAPS and sometimes removers list : Hi Vaigret. Similarly to be fair to you I won't post on your threads again. However, I just wanted to say, when we GO-LIVE and do a multi-perm approach, I would be very happy for you to do a single perm alternative, as you did with Newbury. It will be interesting to see which approach works best, over time, and you may also enjoy doing it. So I am happy for you to use the NAP's and Remover's selections to create a single perm alternative. Like I said, I won't post here again, but if you feel like putting up an "opposing" single perm when we do our multi-perms, I won't take it the wrong way and would actually welcome it, so I can compare what would have been most effective over time. Up to you of course, but I would be very happy for you to do that, and it would assist the syndicate. I am sure neither of us will say "I told you so" when one way is successful and the other not. But as a comparison it could be very useful. Cheers, G Posted by StayOrGo
This will be fascinating just to see which is the better option.
I'm pretty sure the multi perm along with the hedging option will be financially more beneficial, 'coz it covers more bases and with the later races hedging option, at least if there is a 'Out of the Blue' result, the initial stake money is returned, but 'the proof will be in the pudding' as they say and I look forward to helping with both options.
2.05 Listen to me 2nd and Turn Turk 1st 2.35 Beat That 2nd and Brother Tedd 1st 3.05 1,2,3,4,8, 9, 12 Winner 8 Vancouver 3.40 1,3,4,6 WINNER 6 DESTINYS GOLD 4.15 1,2,3,4 WINNER 2 DAYS OF HEAVEN 4.45 3,4,5, 6 LOSER BROWNVILLE WON
MY ALTERNATIVE PERM Mine would be 2.05 Listen to me and Turn Turk 2.35 Beat That and Brother Tedd 3.05 1,2,3,4,8, 9, 12 3.40 1,3,4,6 4.15 1,2,3,4 4.45 3,4,5, 6 = 1792 x .50 p = £896 Good luck us this afternoon Posted by vaigret
Just amended above to what it is now as remembered I supposed to do just one perm as an alternative not multi perm.
Very difficult from what removers said to decide between Belmont Jewel and Listen to me. Just hope I haven't left wrong one out.
In Response to Re: Vaigrets Alternative perms : No problem, by the very nature of what we are doing, one will succeed one day the other the next (hopefully for the syndicate anyway). Going forward, I will record each of our profit and loss (The syndicate and yours), to get a longer term picture as time goes by. I hope you do get LEG 6. Cheers, G Posted by StayOrGo
MY ALTERNATIVE PERM Mine would be 2.05 Listen to me 2nd and Turn Turk 1st 2.35 Beat That 2nd and Brother Tedd 1st 3.05 1,2,3,4,8, 9, 12 Winner 8 Vancouver 3.40 1,3,4,6 WINNER 6 DESTINYS GOLD 4.15 1,2,3,4 WINNER 2 DAYS OF HEAVEN 4.45 3,4,5, 6 LOSER BROWNVILLE WON = 1792 x .50 p = £896 Good luck us this afternoon Posted by vaigret
HONOURS EVEN LOSER IN THE LAST HAD A FEELING COURSE WINNER WOULD DO ME
NOT A FAN OF DOING THESE WITHOUT THE NAPS AND REMOVERS BUT GRAHAM SAID FEEL FREE TO DO ONE TOMOZ SO HERE GOES 2.00 PARIS ROOFTOPS TRILLIANT ITALIAN HEIRESS LIGHTENING DANCE 2.30 FAST AND HOT AZZURI THAMES KNIGHT ART OF SWING MILKY WAY 3.05 LADWEB FREDERICKA 3.40 LONDON PRIZE STERNRUBIN CHARTBREAKER MEDBURN CUTLER 4.15 MILTON ROAD QUICK SKIPS LAD 4.45 TIME TO EXCEED THE WARRIOR 640 LINES AT 0.50 =£320 Posted by vaigret
GL V!
Yes I know what you mean re NAP's and removers but it's too much work to do it when we are not going for it.
It's just a way of people having a crack at it on their own when they think it's +ev to do so.
If someone gets particularly good results over time we can look further at their thoughts/processes.
I am all for offering people the opportunity to show their prowess, although as you know, I'm not keen on people showing how "wise" they are after the event, so this offers a fair platform for people to showcase their skills should they wish to do so.
It's a way of recording their results over time, and as such, it is yet another avenue (on top of the NAP's and REMOVERS process) for people to put "weight" behind their opinions.
Plus it is completely optional if and when they do it, so it's flexible too.
Although if one is to approach it seriously, it would be wise to only do it when you think it is +ev
This can be on a GO or a NO-GO day, either is fine.
Cheers,
G
P.S. Unless you mention otherwise, I will assume, going forward, that you want your profit and loss recorded for all perms you put forward.
In Response to Re: Vaigrets Alternative perms : GL V! Yes I know what you mean re NAP's and removers but it's too much work to do it when we are not going for it. It's just a way of people having a crack at it on their own when they think it's +ev to do so. If someone gets particularly good results over time we can look further at their thoughts/processes. I am all for offering people the opportunity to show their prowess, although as you know, I'm not keen on people showing how "wise" they are after the event, so this offers a fair platform for people to showcase their skills should they wish to do so. It's a way of recording their results over time, and as such, it is yet another avenue (on top of the NAP's and REMOVERS process) for people to put "weight" behind their opinions. Plus it is completely optional if and when they do it, so it's flexible too. Although if one is to approach it seriously, it would be wise to only do it when you think it is +ev This can be on a GO or a NO-GO day, either is fine. Cheers, G P.S. Unless you mention otherwise, I will assume, going forward, that you want your profit and loss recorded for all perms you put forward. Posted by StayOrGo
Hi G,
As regards profit and loss not worried either way only doing as I had some time and noticed your post on the other thread. The idea was to post the alternative when we had all the info and can fully understand no naps and removers on non going days. That would be a complete waste of time.
To be honest with this I just flicked through for half an hour or so and added horses to get the perm upto something like £300 . No science behind it other than that.
Comments
Similarly to be fair to you I won't post on your threads again.
However, I just wanted to say, when we GO-LIVE and do a multi-perm approach, I would be very happy for you to do a single perm alternative, as you did with Newbury.
It will be interesting to see which approach works best, over time, and you may also enjoy doing it. So I am happy for you to use the NAP's and Remover's selections to create a single perm alternative.
Like I said, I won't post here again, but if you feel like putting up an "opposing" single perm when we do our multi-perms, I won't take it the wrong way and would actually welcome it, so I can compare what would have been most effective over time.
Up to you of course, but I would be very happy for you to do that, and it would assist the syndicate.
I am sure neither of us will say "I told you so" when one way is successful and the other not. But as a comparison it could be very useful.
Cheers,
G
Could be fun
Mine would be
2.05 Listen to me 2nd and Turn Turk 1st
2.35 Beat That 2nd and Brother Tedd 1st
3.05 1,2,3,4,8, 9, 12 Winner 8 Vancouver
3.40 1,3,4,6 WINNER 6 DESTINYS GOLD
4.15 1,2,3,4 WINNER 2 DAYS OF HEAVEN
4.45 3,4,5, 6 LOSER BROWNVILLE WON
= 1792 x .50 p = £896
Good luck us this afternoon
Very difficult from what removers said to decide between Belmont Jewel and Listen to me. Just hope I haven't left wrong one out.
P.S. I owe you £1.10 which will be paid to your bank account on 31/05/17.
Cheers,
G
Going forward, I will record each of our profit and loss (The syndicate and yours), to get a longer term picture as time goes by.
I hope you do get LEG 6.
Cheers,
G
REALLY WORRIED RE bROWNVILLE
NOT A FAN OF DOING THESE WITHOUT THE NAPS AND REMOVERS BUT GRAHAM SAID FEEL FREE TO DO ONE TOMOZ SO HERE GOES
2.00 PARIS ROOFTOPS
TRILLIANT
ITALIAN HEIRESS
LIGHTENING DANCE WIN
2.30
FAST AND HOT
AZZURI
THAMES KNIGHT ALL LOST
ART OF SWING
MILKY WAY
3.05 LADWEB
FREDERICKA BOTH LOST
3.40
LONDON PRIZE WIN
STERNRUBIN
CHARTBREAKER
MEDBURN CUTLER
4.15 MILTON ROAD WIN
QUICK SKIPS LAD
4.45
TIME TO EXCEED
THE WARRIOR
640 LINES AT 0.50 =£320
Hi G,
As regards profit and loss not worried either way only doing as I had some time and noticed your post on the other thread. The idea was to post the alternative when we had all the info and can fully understand no naps and removers on non going days. That would be a complete waste of time.
To be honest with this I just flicked through for half an hour or so and added horses to get the perm upto something like £300 . No science behind it other than that.
Just hope it doesn't come up.
Father V
2.00; 1,6,7,10
2.30; 4
3.00; 1,3,4
3.30; 1,2,3,4,8
4.00; 1,3,5,10
4.30 ;1,3,5
720 x 50p =£360
LOSER