Potential three perms on OP. Had to make some tough removals and also couldn't put all NAP's in. Especially big priced NAP's that cover just a small amount of the betting percentage. I did try to incorporate horses like NATAVIA and HORSEPLAY, NOT SO SLEEPY, but things would have had to give that I wasn't happy with. The perm cost spiralled to /> £600 which when the roll over is only small, is too much really. There may be some last minute changes based on market moves, but the OP is now close to what I expect our bets to be. Cheers, G Posted by StayOrGo
Shame, I tried to incorporate NOT SO SLEEPY, just got stuck with inflated perm costs, and couldn't manage it. Had we stuck with HIGHLAND REEL as a semi-banker, then we may have found room for it. Who knows?
We're very exposed in LEG 4, but there was overwhelming NAP's for BOROCCO, so had to choose a leg to "under" cover, and based on NAP's, I determined it was probably best to be LEG 4. Lets hope BOROCCO wins. :=) However from a "statistical" perspective, I am unhappy with LEG4, especially in PERM B. Tried other alternatives, but decided I needed to leave as is. Perm sizes just got out of control otherwise. If we are still in after LEG 3, LEG 4 will be a nervous watch. G Posted by StayOrGo
Comments
Not to worry.
Looks like Soloman's Bay in the 5.15 would have bust us anyway, so not quite as near a miss as I thought.
At least I can sleep knowing that my "marginal decisions" didn't cost us.
G