The point clearly is that if someone was clever enough to tempt some of the 40,000 unique players to play more than two games, on one day, per month on average over the year, then the site could benefit dramatically. This seems a very low figure, and I am sure Sky will be concerned, even if you aren't. If you cant see that an average of 1600 players per day, which represents around 4% of the 40,000, could be improved upon, then I give up. 4% play 96% don't. No point in repeating myself. You can either see it or you cant.
Even cleverer if we could tempt them to play cash...
The point clearly is that if someone was clever enough to tempt some of the 40,000 unique players to play more than two games, on one day, per month on average over the year, then the site could benefit dramatically. This seems a very low figure, and I am sure Sky will be concerned, even if you aren't. If you cant see that an average of 1600 players per day, which represents around 4% of the 40,000, could be improved upon, then I give up. 4% play 96% don't. No point in repeating myself. You can either see it or you cant.
Even cleverer if we could tempt them to play cash...
The point clearly is that if someone was clever enough to tempt some of the 40,000 unique players to play more than two games, on one day, per month on average over the year, then the site could benefit dramatically. This seems a very low figure, and I am sure Sky will be concerned, even if you aren't. If you cant see that an average of 1600 players per day, which represents around 4% of the 40,000, could be improved upon, then I give up. 4% play 96% don't. No point in repeating myself. You can either see it or you cant.
Even cleverer if we could tempt them to play cash...
Perhaps they do, which, of course, is your point.
You could track a few to find out, although I suppose if you were bothered, you would have done that already. It just seemed such a low figure.
The point clearly is that if someone was clever enough to tempt some of the 40,000 unique players to play more than two games, on one day, per month on average over the year, then the site could benefit dramatically. This seems a very low figure, and I am sure Sky will be concerned, even if you aren't. If you cant see that an average of 1600 players per day, which represents around 4% of the 40,000, could be improved upon, then I give up. 4% play 96% don't. No point in repeating myself. You can either see it or you cant.
Even cleverer if we could tempt them to play cash...
Perhaps they do, which, of course, is your point.
You could track a few to find out, although I suppose if you were bothered, you would have done that already. It just seemed such a low figure.
The point clearly is that if someone was clever enough to tempt some of the 40,000 unique players to play more than two games, on one day, per month on average over the year, then the site could benefit dramatically. This seems a very low figure, and I am sure Sky will be concerned, even if you aren't. If you cant see that an average of 1600 players per day, which represents around 4% of the 40,000, could be improved upon, then I give up. 4% play 96% don't. No point in repeating myself. You can either see it or you cant.
Even cleverer if we could tempt them to play cash...
Perhaps they do, which, of course, is your point.
You could track a few to find out, although I suppose if you were bothered, you would have done that already. It just seemed such a low figure.
Maybe, you know, they already did?
Then I would have expected you to say "they do", rather than "perhaps they do" in your last post.
Comments
It just seemed such a low figure.