In news that is totally predictable, Hateful Hartley-Brewer gets her facts wrong.
It is not necessary to wear a mask at a lunch. That is also true for schoolkids. It is only in other communal areas that children will be advised to wear masks.
However, it is true to say that, on other occasions beyond the comprehension of Hartley-Brewer, Ministers do not follow guidance.
But that is because of colossal stupidity on their part. An awful lot of conspiracy theories result from stupidity, rather than some sort of conspiracy.
In news that is totally predictable, Hateful Hartley-Brewer gets her facts wrong.
It is not necessary to wear a mask at a lunch. That is also true for schoolkids. It is only in other communal areas that children will be advised to wear masks.
However, it is true to say that, on other occasions beyond the comprehension of Hartley-Brewer, Ministers do not follow guidance.
But that is because of colossal stupidity on their part. An awful lot of conspiracy theories result from stupidity, rather than some sort of conspiracy.
What a load of tosh for a reply.
1 somebody obviously doesn’t respect the views of the presenter, even though she is spot on. Possibly because he holds a grudge against somebody that tells it as it is. 2 I thought this was supposed to be a highly transmissible deadly virus? A virus that is supposed to be transmissible no matter how many jabs one has. 3 Mr Phil never even contemplates why it’s ok to eat a meal at any gathering,let alone a mass gathering, without a mask. The obvious answer being you can’t eat with a mask on. The science says you exhale more toxins from your lungs through your mouth than by any other method. I presume they get up and mask up to visit the loo at this venue,one by one?🤣 I wonder what science backed fact Mr Phil has,to back up eating without a mask on, has with reducing the spread of a deadly virus. So to say “ it’s not necessary to wear a mask at a lunch” is not questioned, just go along with. One perfect sheep. 4 The narrative suggests that a fair amount at this lunch fall into the vulnerable category by age alone. Unless everything that has been pushed is BS.
Mr Phil, your only out is that none of them use the NHS.
The original post is a conspiracy realist post, which still makes it a conspiracy.
Jeffrey Epstein was into Transhumanism. He owned a big chunk of Moderna. Moderna owns the patent to the operating system in the vaccine. Stephen Hawking was a guest.
A silicon chip inside her head is switched to overload? Guns are being targeted. Got the silicon chip idea from Steve Jobs. Live aid for famine/ climate change? Environmental? Columbia record label, Columbia uni develops the smallest ever chip. Time for a conspiracy🙌
Comments
You on Maxwells list??
It is not necessary to wear a mask at a lunch. That is also true for schoolkids. It is only in other communal areas that children will be advised to wear masks.
However, it is true to say that, on other occasions beyond the comprehension of Hartley-Brewer, Ministers do not follow guidance.
But that is because of colossal stupidity on their part. An awful lot of conspiracy theories result from stupidity, rather than some sort of conspiracy.
Conspiracy theories are made up for prime time TV.
Alien abduction happens to others, very you.
Imagination starts with Alcohol .......
1 somebody obviously doesn’t respect the views of the presenter, even though she is spot on.
Possibly because he holds a grudge against somebody that tells it as it is.
2 I thought this was supposed to be a highly transmissible deadly virus?
A virus that is supposed to be transmissible no matter how many jabs one has.
3 Mr Phil never even contemplates why it’s ok to eat a meal at any gathering,let alone a mass gathering, without a mask. The obvious answer being you can’t eat with a mask on. The science says you exhale more toxins from your lungs through your mouth than by any other method.
I presume they get up and mask up to visit the loo at this venue,one by one?🤣
I wonder what science backed fact Mr Phil has,to back up eating without a mask on, has with reducing the spread of a deadly virus. So to say “ it’s not necessary to wear a mask at a lunch” is not questioned, just go along with. One perfect sheep.
4 The narrative suggests that a fair amount at this lunch fall into the vulnerable category by age alone. Unless everything that has been pushed is BS.
Mr Phil, your only out is that none of them use the NHS.
The original post is a conspiracy realist post, which still makes it a conspiracy.
Much love.
This article, and many others, say otherwise:
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/07/31/fact-check-covid-19-pcr-tests-dont-detect-virus-variants/5407334001/
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pcr-delta-idUSL1N2R029V
Changing the goalposts again.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-59463276
Allegedly.
Moderna owns the patent to the operating system in the vaccine.
Stephen Hawking was a guest.
A silicon chip inside her head is switched to overload?
Guns are being targeted.
Got the silicon chip idea from Steve Jobs.
Live aid for famine/ climate change? Environmental?
Columbia record label, Columbia uni develops the smallest ever chip.
Time for a conspiracy🙌