Hi Neil ...... thought I'd deflect the thread to something FAR MORE important......
That horse I told you was my long-term ante-post fancy for The Derby '23 was IMPERIAL EMPEROR, not NOBLE EMPEROR (which is probably why you didn't know about it ! )
Obviously didn't make The Derby this Year....... but WON very nicely yesterday, though at 1/3 FAV, conceding a 7lb penalty, and Charlie Appleby's horses not running to their best, was defo not backable imo.
Certainly a very good prospect for the second half of the Season
Yeah come on guys hes got karate outfits to try on, to play poker for gods sake....... he has no time for such trivial stuff
well yeah who are you to define yourself as so important? making the point to you is an utter waste of time and serves no purpose what so ever. It is for each person to define what their own priorities are, I can think of many many pointless mundane things which I would attribute a higher level of i importance or priority to then I would chatting here. In fact I have just got from my nightly walk, and I happened to bump into an elderly lady who appeared harmless crazy maybe she was high on LSD I dont know. Anyway she tried to convert me to some odd form of Christianity which wasn't even clear what she was on about through poetry that made no sense.
she was clearly mentally ill in some way but she was harmless and seemed like a nice lady and I guess maybe it made her feel good for that brief moment to have someone to talk to. I would say that was more productive and purposeful then responding to your posts here right now.
The thing is EVERYONE notices the trends, the certain situations, the fact that online they are dealing with something very different in its performance.
It just what your own position is. If you are a site ambassador, someone winning packages and getting treated very well, a pro working to push/shove charts which work better online.... you are going to defend it as its in your best interests.
If you are someone playing well, outplaying players, but are getting unusually high amount of outcomes against the odds and have no other agendas... you are going to want change.
If you are an outsider looking in, you have to ask yourself... why on earth would players get sooooooo defensive and angry about someone pointing out the obvious about something they dont have a vested interest in? Hmmmmm?
The thing is EVERYONE notices the trends, the certain situations, the fact that online they are dealing with something very different in its performance.
It just what your own position is. If you are a site ambassador, someone winning packages and getting treated very well, a pro working to push/shove charts which work better online.... you are going to defend it as its in your best interests.
If you are someone playing well, outplaying players, but are getting unusually high amount of outcomes against the odds and have no other agendas... you are going to want change.
If you are an outsider looking in, you have to ask yourself... why on earth would players get sooooooo defensive and angry about someone pointing out the obvious about something they dont have a vested interest in? Hmmmmm?
The thing is EVERYONE notices the trends, the certain situations, the fact that online they are dealing with something very different in its performance.
It just what your own position is. If you are a site ambassador, someone winning packages and getting treated very well, a pro working to push/shove charts which work better online.... you are going to defend it as its in your best interests.
If you are someone playing well, outplaying players, but are getting unusually high amount of outcomes against the odds and have no other agendas... you are going to want change.
If you are an outsider looking in, you have to ask yourself... why on earth would players get sooooooo defensive and angry about someone pointing out the obvious about something they dont have a vested interest in? Hmmmmm?
The thing is EVERYONE notices the trends, the certain situations, the fact that online they are dealing with something very different in its performance.
It just what your own position is. If you are a site ambassador, someone winning packages and getting treated very well, a pro working to push/shove charts which work better online.... you are going to defend it as its in your best interests.
If you are someone playing well, outplaying players, but are getting unusually high amount of outcomes against the odds and have no other agendas... you are going to want change.
If you are an outsider looking in, you have to ask yourself... why on earth would players get sooooooo defensive and angry about someone pointing out the obvious about something they dont have a vested interest in? Hmmmmm?
So after all that can anyone deny that skypoker change hands in the favour of bigger stacks. Whether it’s in favour of you or I we all see it happen every time we play. If you were at a casino playing at a table and it happened as frequently as it does on this site your chin would be on the table as well🤔
Comments
Hi Neil ...... thought I'd deflect the thread to something FAR MORE important......
That horse I told you was my long-term ante-post fancy for The Derby '23 was IMPERIAL EMPEROR, not NOBLE EMPEROR (which is probably why you didn't know about it ! )
Obviously didn't make The Derby this Year....... but WON very nicely yesterday, though at 1/3 FAV, conceding a 7lb penalty, and Charlie Appleby's horses not running to their best, was defo not backable imo.
Certainly a very good prospect for the second half of the Season
she was clearly mentally ill in some way but she was harmless and seemed like a nice lady and I guess maybe it made her feel good for that brief moment to have someone to talk to. I would say that was more productive and purposeful then responding to your posts here right now.
Although wholly consistent with the madness of the Sky forum members.....