You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Most Profitable Starting Hands
Aski
Member Posts: 263
Having watched the numerous repeats of those interviews with various players on here at the Sky tournaments, especially the bit about their favourite hands, it got me thinking a bit.
Yes we get the old favourites of Aces, and kings, and I think even Trevor Harris one said on air, how can anyone not say that pocket aces isnt their favourite hand, and well I was thinking there has to be a reason for this, and surely then I got to thinking yes aces and kings are the two best hands to have pre flop but how profitable are they exactly, and is this the reason that I would say that my favourite hand is 9 10 os.
It's a hand I can get away from if I dont hit big, for little investment, and also a hand I can reap the rewards with when I do hit big, where as those more premium hands are the ones that I'm likely to win big against if everything goes in my favour, but when it doesnt I can get away from easily enough, thus minimising the amount the premium hand wins.
So the question is what do people think is actually the most protifable hand to hold pre flop.
Is it the monster hand where you win a lot of small pots, with both the occasional big win, and big loss, or the more mediocre hand where your losses are minimised with maybe a few more bigger wins, or is it all situational?
As someone who plays mainly for fun I dont play often enough to be able to say one way or the other which way, so I'm just wondreing what others opinions are in respect of how profitable is a hand that wins 80% of the time compared to a hand that say wins 40% of the time.
Look forward to hopefully some interesting replies
.
Aski
and yes if someone said would you prefer to have pocket aces every hand, I'd say yes, but in reality that isnt going to happen, so lets hear everyone thoughts
Also just an addendum to this, does it matter if its cash or tourny, and if so does it also matter in respect of what stage a tourny is at. The reason I say this is most people would say suited conenctors arent bad to play early on in a tourny when blinds are cheap, so does that early profitability get wiped out later on in a tourny when blinds are bigger, and players are forced to push thus making the premiums hands a lor more profitable due to that situation
Yes we get the old favourites of Aces, and kings, and I think even Trevor Harris one said on air, how can anyone not say that pocket aces isnt their favourite hand, and well I was thinking there has to be a reason for this, and surely then I got to thinking yes aces and kings are the two best hands to have pre flop but how profitable are they exactly, and is this the reason that I would say that my favourite hand is 9 10 os.
It's a hand I can get away from if I dont hit big, for little investment, and also a hand I can reap the rewards with when I do hit big, where as those more premium hands are the ones that I'm likely to win big against if everything goes in my favour, but when it doesnt I can get away from easily enough, thus minimising the amount the premium hand wins.
So the question is what do people think is actually the most protifable hand to hold pre flop.
Is it the monster hand where you win a lot of small pots, with both the occasional big win, and big loss, or the more mediocre hand where your losses are minimised with maybe a few more bigger wins, or is it all situational?
As someone who plays mainly for fun I dont play often enough to be able to say one way or the other which way, so I'm just wondreing what others opinions are in respect of how profitable is a hand that wins 80% of the time compared to a hand that say wins 40% of the time.
Look forward to hopefully some interesting replies
.Aski
and yes if someone said would you prefer to have pocket aces every hand, I'd say yes, but in reality that isnt going to happen, so lets hear everyone thoughts
Also just an addendum to this, does it matter if its cash or tourny, and if so does it also matter in respect of what stage a tourny is at. The reason I say this is most people would say suited conenctors arent bad to play early on in a tourny when blinds are cheap, so does that early profitability get wiped out later on in a tourny when blinds are bigger, and players are forced to push thus making the premiums hands a lor more profitable due to that situation
Comments
But aces is still the most profitable hand when 100bb deep as my holdem manager statistics say that i earn more than double with aces than any other hand when playing 100bb cash games, my second most profitable hand is kk lol :-)
Very much matters if it is a cash game or tourny!!!
I love little pairs in cash games, especially in multi way pots. Massive stacking potential!!
My fave poker saying "Ive been hitin more sets than Roger Federer" lately
I did play a hand yesterday, I raised UTG with 44, FOUR callers behind me and the flop comes, ACE ACE FOUR.
I lead out, and there's 4 folds! How could there NOT be an ace in those 8 calls??? lol
Any sorta hand like 34/45/56/67/78/89, and pairs are cool to play when Im calling in position. When I'm making the running, I want stronger hands. Don't mind opening with 2-3 UTG occasionally tho
Darn I knew I would miss one, although I was concious of having too many options, thus with a cough and a wink says that AK can be counted under the connected option of suited and non suited
Aski
Suited connectors!
some sort of analysis as opposed to feeling is always good, as I could stand up here and say that I always play 7 2 os and its my most profitable hand, but in reality I wouldnt know.
However to throw the cat amongst the pigeons here, how would you describe your playing style. Are you a fairly tight player, thus the majority of your hands that you win, will be premium ones or would you say that the analysis is fairly representitive. I like to play devils advocate you see
But for now we will say ACES are leading with evidence of 1, as opposed to opinions
Dohhhhhhh, Thanks for the confirmation, after I made the post I realsied that hang on cash and tounry players could have different views, due the blind levels, but thanks for highlighting the postion situationas that obviously has some impact too.
As for your hand tell me about it. I'd been sitting tight and made a raise pre flop with 2 3 suited. Couldnt beleive that I got 4 callers, thinking wow image means nothing at this table. For some reason I cant explain, when the flop came down with an ace, despite having missed totally I put a bet out and everyone folds, which then gets me thinking what on earth did they call a tight players raise with if non of them had an ace
I would have thought that, at least where players are deepstacked, that this is far from the most profitable.
It really only plays well against smaller aces.
It's value comes from "fold equity" i.e. being able to get your opponent to fold pre-flop.
Playing against an opponent who has called you with a medium pair, you're not going to get action if you hit your ace so you rarely get paid big and you are susceptible to set miners hitting their card or people with worse aces hitting two pairs.
I say all this without looking at my stats for AK so I'm probably wrong!
What we need to remember is that this is about profitability. You may have won 100% of hands where you hold a certain hand, but then find that another hand where you only win 10% hands is actually the more profitable.
I guess that everyone will have a hand where they won big once, like Kirsti stated above, but the question is, is that one hand profitable over time, thus from a research point of view, one off wins would have to be discounted, as obviosuly we need to look long term.
ie if someone comes on and says they always plays 7 2 off as its profitiable for them, then Id be hoping that they back that up by saing they have played it 1000 times won with it say 50 but made this much from those 50 wins, im comparison to another hand where they have won 800 times but only made this much.
Why do I have to think of stuff like this on a Monday morning, my mind is all a boggle now
....my opponent's hand
In tourney's especially late on I love getting AK, 10-20 BB's push, push, push !
AA ALL THE WAY!
If i look at how many times i should have been dealt aces vr my actual times i had aces, the results are quite similar....29500 hands/220 probability of getting a pocket pair pre=134, i was dealt aces 134 times and KK 131 times.
I think the reason people think other hands like 55 are more profitable is because when you hit a set and stack top pair you remember this more than when you have to fold it on the flop most of the time, where as with aces you are expecting to win so when you lose it hurts and you remember this more than all the times you win.
If anyones intrested in the hands i lost the most money with its, 85o and q2o lol.
This is kinda off subject but do you reckon a nitty 10/2 player playing 1000nl with a 3bet% of 1 would lose money playing aces? ....surely they would not win much lol.