i`v got to admit i used to go out sunday nites because nowt was on but then watched primo, whether in it or not i enjoyed watchin, if it`s gone, i`m off out again which means no poker for me on laptop
There are some really good points here, but the basis of any programme has to be variety, fun and excellent content. The presenters and analysis is second to none. The live programmes are superb and enthralling especially if you are playing, so the more the merrier. You need cash AND tournament coverage to cater for everyones taste, we aren't all cash players after all. Surely, there are ways of cutting down costs without losing the superb 3D effects and losing more and more live coverage. When sky poker first started, The Club was on every night which was very witty and informative and there was an Open tournament or such every night. Surely things should be getting better and better rather than going backwards? Sky has always been innovative with its football and other sport coverage, surelt it has to lead the way with Poker aswell.
After all, we would ALL like to see more of Tikay and Lisa Marie.....
I agree with most of the posts on here, the only reason I joined Sky Poker over any other site was because of the live tournaments shown on TV, and in particualr the 3D studio set up. This is one of the big reasons for watching and joining Sky Poker in the first place. I also enjoy the presenting of Rich Orford and Tikey together (great chemistry) and also LML with anyone. I think Sky are lucky to have her, she is a great presenter and is not just a pretty face, she knows her stuff too, as well as being ammusing with her on screen banter.
In my opinion to lose lots of live tournaments in favour of re runs and repeats, and to lose the unique 3D imaging and how that works with the presenters will be a huge step back for Sky. I understand that the cost might be high for the 3D studio, but how many people will not sign up or even leave Sky Poker because it will just become one of many similar Poker formats.
Keep things the way they are, 3D screen, on screen presenter chemistry and the live tournaments are what sets Sky Poker apart from the rest.
Comments
Surely, there are ways of cutting down costs without losing the superb 3D effects and losing more and more live coverage. When sky poker first started, The Club was on every night which was very witty and informative and there was an Open tournament or such every night. Surely things should be getting better and better rather than going backwards? Sky has always been innovative with its football and other sport coverage, surelt it has to lead the way with Poker aswell.
After all, we would ALL like to see more of Tikay and Lisa Marie.....
In my opinion to lose lots of live tournaments in favour of re runs and repeats, and to lose the unique 3D imaging and how that works with the presenters will be a huge step back for Sky. I understand that the cost might be high for the 3D studio, but how many people will not sign up or even leave Sky Poker because it will just become one of many similar Poker formats.
Keep things the way they are, 3D screen, on screen presenter chemistry and the live tournaments are what sets Sky Poker apart from the rest.