In Response to Re: Big Brother's Little Brother (Tournament Idea) : If you posted that on your own account, I would of liked that Excellent idea though. Posted by MAXALLY
Great, if you win and my idea is added does that mean I get one of your primo entries ;o)
In Response to Re: Big Brother's Little Brother (Tournament Idea) : Great, if you win and my idea is added does that mean I get one of your primo entries ;o) Posted by JockBMW
How many low buy ins do u guys want !!! Posted by DOHHHHHHH
That's v. generous of you JJ.................can you put me in for 3 per week to start with....I can't spk for the others but i'm sure they'll let you know in due course......thanx bud -
In Response to Re: Big Brother's Little Brother (Tournament Idea) : That's v. generous of you JJ.................can you put me in for 3 per week to start with....I can't spk for the others but i'm sure they'll let you know in due course......thanx bud - Posted by billyboots
Reference the 'play in both' debate, I would say this should be encouraged in fact!!
Would certainly benifit Sky, and the double promotion of both tourneys, obviously you don't HAVE to play in both, but......
1, If 'Higher rolled' players played in the smaller tourney, does that not make the tourney maybe a better quality, & more attractive to ALL !!
2, Conversley, the 'Lower rolled' players can have the choice of maybe treating themselves maybe once or twice a week/month to play in a different field/style of tourney !
3, To Conclude, How about an prize for the best aggregate score/finish, have seen this work well before, and it would certainly encourage play in both!! Would help begiinners [like me] start to MTT multi-table too !!
Alan you can have those ideas on me, mines a pint in Al's bar ta !
This is an excellent idea Alan, a big YES from me!
However, I do not believe that you should try to restrict entry at all. As we know there is quite a range of abilities in both "High-Rolled" and "Lower-Rolled" staked players. In my opinion there is absolutely no reason for the "Lowers" to be phased by playing against the "Highers", there is everything to gain and nothing to lose. Besides I have always found that, in many competive situations over many years, the stronger the opposition the better I have played, and even won more than a few.
The down side for Sky could be that they lose some entries from the satellites into the ME, thus reducing the final numbers, but I think this would be more than compensated by entries into the BBLB. It could also make the Sky site more attractive to current non Sky players, there must be a lot of "Low Rollers" out there who could find this attractive.
I feel sure that once everything is "tweaked" that this idea will be adopted by Sky and we, as a community of players, will all benefit. So it looks like Win! Win! to me.
I just posted something similar before seeing this but this takes the biscuit. Couldn't be bothered to read all the posts but I hope you changed that rule that Tikay was alluding to and we see these runnign soon.
Comments
I've voted for a resounding yes Alan........and gr8 additional suggestion by JockBMW.
Now u 2 could get together and become the new Morcombe & Wise, Cannon & Ball.............so here goes how, about.......
........................ModMax & BM W ally
Reference the 'play in both' debate, I would say this should be encouraged in fact!!
Would certainly benifit Sky, and the double promotion of both tourneys, obviously you don't HAVE to play in both, but......
1, If 'Higher rolled' players played in the smaller tourney, does that not make the tourney maybe a better quality, & more attractive to ALL !!
2, Conversley, the 'Lower rolled' players can have the choice of maybe treating themselves maybe once or twice a week/month to play in a different field/style of tourney !
3, To Conclude, How about an prize for the best aggregate score/finish, have seen this work well before, and it would certainly encourage play in both!! Would help begiinners [like me] start to MTT multi-table too !!
Alan you can have those ideas on me, mines a pint in Al's bar ta !
X
However, I do not believe that you should try to restrict entry at all. As we know there is quite a range of abilities in both "High-Rolled" and "Lower-Rolled" staked players. In my opinion there is absolutely no reason for the "Lowers" to be phased by playing against the "Highers", there is everything to gain and nothing to lose. Besides I have always found that, in many competive situations over many years, the stronger the opposition the better I have played, and even won more than a few.
The down side for Sky could be that they lose some entries from the satellites into the ME, thus reducing the final numbers, but I think this would be more than compensated by entries into the BBLB. It could also make the Sky site more attractive to current non Sky players, there must be a lot of "Low Rollers" out there who could find this attractive.
I feel sure that once everything is "tweaked" that this idea will be adopted by Sky and we, as a community of players, will all benefit. So it looks like Win! Win! to me.
p.s i voted yes
wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
xx