You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long)

13

Comments

  • MP33MP33 Member Posts: 6,305
    edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long):
    a good read, hope you havent just made the games harder
    Posted by TINTIN
    I agree - an interesting read, but it will make it harder for players already playing levelthe more ppl read it

    it reminds me a bit of Irishrovers threads about DYM,s - It basically spelt out the optimum way to play them and got read by a lot of ppl which resulted in everyone playing them the same way

  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited May 2011
    I wouldn't worry about this thread making nl4 harder if I were you.......

    Theres micro stakes strategy all over the internet, if people want it, they can get it. This is more likely to help the semi-competent players crush the fish even more, rather than help the total fish compete.

    Will probably only help 1% of nl4 players on sky, if that. I doubt 1% will even read it.


  • grantorinograntorino Member Posts: 4,710
    edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long):
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long) : but thats the thing, against these players on the whole we have a HUGE edge
    Posted by The_Don90
    So when are you getting your money in  a better spot (not that you should wait for one anyway)? No way we have enough of an edge to pass up these kind of big +EV spots. We shouldnt be passing up any +EV spots anyway, we want to maximise profit.

    I think people overestimate their edge in these games. Sure you may be a way better player than the fish, that doesnt mean you can take variance completely out of the game
  • walesboywalesboy Member Posts: 993
    edited May 2011
    great post, both Dohhhhhh and Deuces
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,814
    edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long):
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long) : So when are you getting your money in  a better spot (not that you should wait for one anyway)? No way we have enough of an edge to pass up these kind of big +EV spots. We shouldnt be passing up any +EV spots anyway, we want to maximise profit. I think people overestimate their edge in these games. Sure you may be a way better player than the fish, that doesnt mean you can take variance completely out of the game
    Posted by grantorino
    I try to avoid 100BB pots with anything less than TPTK against these guys. So thats AK, AQ type hands, AJ is pretty vunrable on a J high flop still. Infact in general Overpairs and TPTK is my stack off min
  • DeucesLiveDeucesLive Member Posts: 839
    edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long):
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long) : So when are you getting your money in  a better spot (not that you should wait for one anyway)? No way we have enough of an edge to pass up these kind of big +EV spots. We shouldnt be passing up any +EV spots anyway, we want to maximise profit. I think people overestimate their edge in these games. Sure you may be a way better player than the fish, that doesnt mean you can take variance completely out of the game
    Posted by grantorino
    I'll try and rephrase what I'm saying, I think maybe it was a little muddled.

    If you are rolled for the level, you should take every single +EV spot you can. TPGK against a random maniac=+EV.

    Note, this only applies if you are properly rolled.

    The thing that sets NL4 apart from everything else on this site, is you can't go any lower. It's the bottom of the barrel. If you lose buyins, you can't just drop down to rebuild- it is the bottom. Not everyone can afford to dump 20 buyins down to start up- a lot of people can only really put down £10/20 as their starting roll.

    This CAN be built up at NL4 if you play super tight poker.

    If you only have 2.5 buyins, then playing against maniacs is just not a safe way to build your roll. You're gambling. Maniacs are totally unpredictable, chuck chips in at will, and could have anything. This is not desirable with a small roll. Yes, when you have TPGK you're ahead of his range- that's not enough. He could have straight draw, a flush draw, a similar pair to give him plenty of live outs, or he could have a set/2 pair/overpair/better kicker to be dominating you. You have no idea what you're up against, and this is bad news for your short bankroll.

    Set against this is the sheer army of NL4 standard fish, who play a similar way- limp/call preflop, check/fold with absolutely nothing, check/call with any pair any draw, raise huge with the nuts. That is simple as anything to play against- yes, you can get outdrawn, but they tend to announce with neon lights that they just spiked their gutshot. If you get all your money in before they raise, you're ahead 90% of the time. If they do suck out on you, well- you can't escape variance completely, as you said. But you can sure try to minimise it.

    If you do get caught against a maniac, make sure you have a real strong hand. If you're going to go allin, it should be with a bare minimum of 2 pair, assuming you're on a short roll. If you're rolled, all these caveats don't apply- just take your +EV spots and enjoy.

    None of this super cagey approach is applicable to the higher limits- because if you're playing this way, you should be dropping down. It's just you can't do that here, and you need to start somewhere.
  • NorbitNorbit Member Posts: 490
    edited May 2011

    This is a cracking thread and all NL4 players should read it and take note.

    Thread should be stickied at the top of page.
  • Seagull158Seagull158 Member Posts: 1,100
    edited May 2011
    How much of this applies to NL8?
  • LOL_RAISELOL_RAISE Member Posts: 2,188
    edited May 2011
    99.999%
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited May 2011
    I'd of thought most of it.

    Alot of it applies to 30nl, lol

    Not played much nl8 if any at all though, not sure what the differences would be, if any.
  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
    edited May 2011
    Is this like the longest thread in history

    The thing about NL4 is it's full of players who don't know what there doing.
    If you want to guess what they are doing then good luck because they don't even know what there doing

    Just play solid ABC poker - raise pre 4x 5x - bet when you have it - check/fold when you don't
    Fold when you think your beat
    don't bluff anyone :D
    There are so many call to fold players (call a raise OOP and then fold to your c-bet)

    One thing you need to do if you want to improve at this level is work out what players full into what category.
    reg - solid - tight - nit - DON'T PLAY THESE 

    PLAY ALL THESE
    Station 
    maniac
    Likes to bluff on the end
    loves a c-bet
    maniac open shoves  with a9o
    super aggroo 10x bb raiser, always 3 bets, 4 bets way too much
    aggro - raies all the time, always bets
    thinks every bluffs 
    donk - loves a donk donk donk lead - such a donk - must be a donk- stupid donk play - i want his money
    fishy fish i pay anything for my gutshot fish fish 

    etc.... etc...

    Once you start making simple notes then they will help you and you will start to feel comfortable at NL4

    Don't start dancing with squeeze plays and floats because the fish don't understand D
    The fish UTG+2 has 88 and he ain't folding because thats his front door number :D

    If your new to NL4 good luck and most of all enjoy, it's not a lot of money to loose and hey you should only be playing with money you can afford to loose.

    Good luck



  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,945
    edited May 2011
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long):
    In Response to Re: NL4 strategy from DOHHHHHH (v long) : I agree - an interesting read, but it will make it harder for players already playing levelthe more ppl read it it reminds me a bit of Irishrovers threads about DYM,s - It basically spelt out the optimum way to play them and got read by a lot of ppl which resulted in everyone playing them the same way
    Posted by MP33

    You can't stop players from becoming better, if everyone stayed at the same level Doohhhh would not have put this thread together.


  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited May 2011
    Imo , with approx 2 years of play at nl4 nl8 and nl10 there is virtually no difference in the play , it just has players with bigger rolls as you go up the levels xx
  • Richard49Richard49 Member Posts: 73
    edited May 2011
    Fantastic advice for those of us who play for fun at the lower levels.

    Thanks Dohhhhh
  • TRIP5TRIP5 Member Posts: 3,618
    edited June 2011
    Bumped for excellence

    xx
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited September 2011
    Bumped
  • Sky_DaveSky_Dave Member Posts: 3,288
    edited September 2011
    As it's so good, we've decided to immortalise DOHHHHHH by turning his post in to some permanent strategy pages on the website.

    Links here:

    Beating Small Stakes Cash Games - Part 1

    Beating Small Stakes Cash Games - Part 2

    Beating Small Stakes Cash Games - Part 3
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited September 2011
    Yeah brilliant thread Doh, I'd already read it in the Sky Poker School section because you pointed me there recently but I just thought I'd say how great it was again.

    Also, to the other people who mentioned it, I wouldn't worry about this helping everyone to get good and 4NL becoming tough, because most of these fish are just playing for a bit of a gamble and never venture anywhere near the forum and never intend to improve their game. These are the people who say it's all luck anyway, so how could you improve your game??
  • WHOAMI196WHOAMI196 Member Posts: 1,170
    edited September 2011
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!! m8 great thread

    so ....."Bump"
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited January 2015
    Found this earlier to pass on to someone so thought I'd bump it cos it's still a great read.
Sign In or Register to comment.