All Categories› Poker Chat

You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Bring back........

YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
edited June 2011 in Poker Chat
Neildown please! please do not delete this, i dont think he was trolling/flaming etc

Lots of player on here love him(literally obv) and i dont see how bringing a bit of comedy can be classed as a ban IMO, he was never personal to anyone and is a great asset to the community. Also Hitsquad member which we dont want to lose.

Please reconsider Sky Dave, also can you explain why he has got banned on forum & table chat even though he has not done anything wrong on the tables?? he also wont play on here unless chat is re-instated which is quite right too

So sky do you want to lose another valued member of the community over something silly??
· Share on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited June 2011
    Well i LOVE him so was easy peasy answer for me xxx
    · Share on Twitter
  • BananaDogBananaDog Member Posts: 1,390
    edited June 2011
    I voted the 1st! lol
    · Share on Twitter
  • pod1pod1 Member Posts: 4,377
    edited June 2011
    great asset to sky, had me in stitches many i time. loud, full on yes! bad person no. unfortunatly john i remember the mickjenn thing and sky never backed down, even though he goes to live events with sky and is friends with most presenters. we are going to get " you havnt got the full storey"  and the rules state etc etc im afraid. phil
    · Share on Twitter
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited June 2011
    How can people say shut the door? is this mods who have voted that if so can you explain please

    PS- not trolling etc so please dont ban me lets discuss this properly
    · Share on Twitter
  • stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,915
    edited June 2011
    neils a legend,wots he done:(
    · Share on Twitter
  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Bring back........:
    How can people say shut the door? is this mods who have voted that if so can you explain please PS- not trolling etc so please dont ban me lets discuss this properly
    Posted by YOUNG_GUN
    Yes ive noticed that,they put something nasty and NEVER explain why,very annoying indeed xxx
    · Share on Twitter
  • IRISHROVERIRISHROVER Member Posts: 7,606
    edited June 2011


     Defo agree with this .
     Neildown  is a bit of a joker ,
    everyone knows that in this forum.

    His crime is
    he joked about a skypoker employee ,
    and sky went ott on him
    and chat banned him indefinitely .

    THIS FORUM HAS BEING GOOD FUN OF LATE ,
    FORUM PEEPS & MODS ARE WORKING WELL TOGETHER .
    TAKE NOTE SUITS NEILS COMMENT WAS ONLY A BIT OF FUN .

    There goes the primo seat i was looking for in the
    new  dym comp lol .
    Ah well better to be a man then a mouse .

    squeeeeeek lol .
    · Share on Twitter
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited June 2011
    again more no's and no answer on here please do tell..
    · Share on Twitter
  • elsadogelsadog Member Posts: 5,677
    edited June 2011
    Total over reaction to what was a humorous post.

    There has been a lot of effort and hard work put in lately to re-invigorate the forum - not by the mods but by the members. 

    Banning Neil just undermines all that effort - talk about shooting yourselves in the foot.


    I see we have some no votes - stand up and be counted if you think it was justified. 


    · Share on Twitter
  • emilyeggemilyegg Member Posts: 3,408
    edited June 2011
    Humour! Humour? we will have none of that stuff here..............
    · Share on Twitter
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited June 2011
    the joke of it all is neildown was a mod on anotoher forum so knows the boundaries and what is asked of mods its over a silly arguement which i assume has been taken out of context
    · Share on Twitter
  • igimcigimc Member Posts: 625
    edited June 2011
    Unfortunatley you are probably wasting your time.
    You know what they say"it takes a big man to admit when hes
    wrong".The fact that no mods have even responded to this thread
    says it all.
    · Share on Twitter
  • Wacko90Wacko90 Member Posts: 906
    edited June 2011
    Only issue here is if sky re instate neils privileges then why wont they do it for other people who have been banned for similar offences. Could get messy...
    · Share on Twitter
  • achillachill Member Posts: 1,056
    edited June 2011
    He's one of us.

    I voted for option 2 as i don't think he said anything untoward in the table chat so seems harsh to ban him there also.

    If you didn't want people to vote no why put it up as an option.  
    · Share on Twitter
  • AcidMan27AcidMan27 Member Posts: 3,752
    edited June 2011
    No idea what he's done so can't really vote.

    He seemed like a decent guy though. I quite like his brand of humour.
    · Share on Twitter
  • igimcigimc Member Posts: 625
    edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Bring back........:
    Only issue here is if sky re instate neils privileges then why wont they do it for other people who have been banned for similar offences. Could get messy...
    Posted by Wacko90
    surely you have to take each induvidual case on its merits though.
    · Share on Twitter
  • igimcigimc Member Posts: 625
    edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Bring back........:
    He's one of us. I voted for option 2 as i don't think he said anything untoward in the table chat so seems harsh to ban him there also. If you didn't want people to vote no why put it up as an option.  
    Posted by achill
    they can vote no,but should have the b alls to come on and say why.
    · Share on Twitter
  • Wacko90Wacko90 Member Posts: 906
    edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Bring back........:
    In Response to Re: Bring back........ : surely you have to take each induvidual case on its merits though.
    Posted by igimc
    True but it could potentially bring alot of trouble for sky. If someone else commits a simialar offence in the future, something like this could be used against sky "oh well you let neildown off so why not me" blah blah, all im saying is it could get messy for sky. But what do i know :)
    · Share on Twitter
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited June 2011
    In Response to Re: Bring back........:
    He's one of us. I voted for option 2 as i don't think he said anything untoward in the table chat so seems harsh to ban him there also. If you didn't want people to vote no why put it up as an option.  
    Posted by achill
    I didnt state that mate, i asked if they can put a reason as those that are voting yes for

    and i completely agree he should at least have table chat returned
    · Share on Twitter
  • loonytoonsloonytoons Member Posts: 4,270
    edited June 2011
    However much i agree with this thread in principle, i must say that it will serve no purpose whatsoever other than to allow sky now to dig their heels in. I remember when another forum member got banned and the decision was overturned through 'diplomatic' means, ie by way of PM's with the sky peeps, you must remember they need to save face and they definately cannot show favouritism, reinstate him now, and everyone will want a reprieve. Is he banned for life or just a month? if it is life it sure is a hard sentence, i think sky should get Ken Clarke in as forum justice minister lol. I also agree with elsa, the usual forum peeps that had 'gone away' and now 'come back' and got some humour and fun back in must wonder why they bother.
    · Share on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.