You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Player | Action | Cards | Amount | Pot | Balance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
zinobino04 | Small blind | £0.10 | £0.10 | £11.78 | |
bustout44 | Big blind | £0.20 | £0.30 | £18.95 | |
Your hole cards |
| ||||
TT2001 | Raise | £0.60 | £0.90 | £29.25 | |
painy12 | Raise | £1.40 | £2.30 | £33.35 | |
snapper725 | Fold | ||||
MP33 | Call | £1.40 | £3.70 | £34.28 | |
zinobino04 | Call | £1.30 | £5.00 | £10.48 | |
bustout44 | Call | £1.20 | £6.20 | £17.75 | |
TT2001 | Call | £0.80 | £7.00 | £28.45 | |
Flop | |||||
| |||||
zinobino04 | Check | ||||
bustout44 | Check | ||||
TT2001 | Check | ||||
painy12 | Bet | £2.60 | £9.60 | £30.75 | |
MP33 | Call | £2.60 | £12.20 | £31.68 | |
zinobino04 | Call | £2.60 | £14.80 | £7.88 | |
bustout44 | Fold | ||||
TT2001 | All-in | £28.45 | £43.25 | £0.00 | |
painy12 | All-in | £30.75 | £74.00 | £0.00 | |
MP33 | Call | £30.75 | £104.75 | £0.93 | |
zinobino04 | All-in | £7.88 | £112.63 | £0.00 | |
zinobino04 | Show |
| |||
TT2001 | Show |
| |||
painy12 | Show |
| |||
MP33 | Show |
| |||
Turn | |||||
| |||||
River | |||||
| |||||
MP33 | Win | Flush to the Ace | £110.83 | £111.76 |
Comments
obv post flop is standard but pre is bad
you'd have to much deeper imo to clarify a call - the effective stack would have to be atleast 250BB and you'd have to have good reads
I was just saying how it's understandable if someone (I wouldn't) wants to take a shot when they have 20BIs for 20NL but I certainly don't recommend it with a BR of £300 which is what I hear it is via the 4NL diary thread.
I mean if you stop and think, you've just won 1 pot which is more than third of your entire BR, and you could have just as easily LOST that pot which is over a third of your BR (I don't mean you'd have lost 1/3 of your BR in one hand, because you didn't contribute it all). And in my opinion you should never be winning a pot that is like 'Oh my god, i just won **** loads'. Because it works both ways, you can equally lose a pot of the same size and I don't think it's good for your health if you're getting stressed out about losing big hands and over excited about winning big ones which you naturally will with a pot this size. I don't think you should have much emotion in your game because it'll put you under loads of pressure with the ups and downs of variance. Winning a pot should almost not even matter, it's just about making the right decisions.
Can you really afford to make the right decision but lose (for stacks) 5 times and be £100 down?
the question wasn,t really about the bankroll although i was 2 tabling NL10 as a bit of a trial for an hour instead of 4 tabling Nl10, which is why i was coming off at the time as I realised I,m not rolled fro NL20 yet.
its only been less than 2 weeks from NL4 , so will stick with NL10 2-3 tabling - BR now £377 from £150
I think Painy played it badly by not raising more pre and letting me in
Ok _ preflop - maybe should lay it down. having said that I,m not as nitty as I used to be and like to play a lot weaker hands sometimes to alter my image and when best to do it but whe n your in position
That was the biggest pot i,ve played in 3 weeks by quite a margin, but thats a good way of looking at things
Also with playing higher you can start winning more as a percentage as once you have 20 BI's winning pots at same level become less significant like me playing NL4 with a £300 roll for instance plus or minus is irrelevent.
Did ya hear Tikay the other night when he stated ' why be in a rush to move up just cos ure rolled when its easy to make money a level lower'
I think this does make sense
as played id be tempted 2 raise the weak flop lead, althou i may just call
whether or not u shud call off on the flop depends on the range u put them on and ur equity vs it
But overall it's probably a good thing the way you're doing it which is much better than trying it with LESS than 20 BI's lol
some interesting points above for playing it different ways