You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

A little help here

acerag83acerag83 Member Posts: 76
edited September 2011 in Poker Chat
I'm well aware that some will slate this post but a serious question. Does anyone else feel in an MTT that certain players ( who seem to cash consistently ) tend to hit cards more often than most , or maybe that bigger stacks will 90% outdraw smaller stacks.
Just out of open - to very good player and regular casher , who i wont name but trust me is a very well known player with huge sucsess , blinds 10 / 20 , i raise to 80 with A A , he makes it 240 , i make it 800 , he calls. flop comes 8 6 5 , i shove expecting him to have K K or Q Q etc , he snaps with 5 5 and to rub salt into wound turns quads!!!!

1. preflop with 1800 stack he calls 800 with 5 5 , really ???? Surely that is shove or fold , and the fact i raised and then re-raised his re raise must tell him he is behind. If he feels im on AK,AQ etc or total rubbish he just shoves surely????
2. i have experienced similar againts 3 other regular cashers in last 3 or 4 tourneys , am i just being silly or do some players seem to catch pretty much everything they chase?

I know as i said at the start that a number of people will say im being ridiculous, but im certain more will agree.

Either way let me know your thoughts please

Many thanks
«1

Comments

  • AcidMan27AcidMan27 Member Posts: 3,752
    edited September 2011
    Some people maybe luckier than others, but to say they always hit or the big chip stack always beats the smaller chip stack is a little naive imo.

    Isn't the open a rebuy this evening ?
     
    If it is then calling with 5/5 in that situation is well worth it.


  • BLACK_MASSBLACK_MASS Member Posts: 401
    edited September 2011
    Go to bbv section of forum and read this thread Tonight's roller exit
    I think there are a lot of people with a lot of money that dont care about pot odds etc sometimes esp. in tourneys .The money is nothing to them esp. when they run good too. I honestly believe that some people have like 10% + modifier on variance for a year or two. Like the poster before said just luckier.
    Look man people can see what you've said and you're not alone in being there.
    It's how you deal with it that counts. Up to you really. How much of an edge have you got ? How much do you enjoy the challenge of 'learning' things ? Do you think poker is fun ?
    Ultimately tho people are gonna tell you to stop being a paranoid wretch and stop whining because you win 81% of time there blah blah ........etc forever. Get into Area 51 with all the acid casualty cranks.
    If you read old forum posts from different areas you can see that there are certain patterns to peoples enquiries that ultimately will never get resolved.
    You just gotta learn how to win money and forget about everything else.
    Believe it or not i understand what you say and have every sympathy with you.
    But poker is like life and just not fair sometimes. William Blake had it figured best i reckon when he wrote this :
    Every night and every morn Some to misery are born,
    Every morn and every night Some are born to sweet delight.
    Some are born to sweet delight,
    Some are born to endless night.
    The rest is up to you. GL man ! It's only a game :)

    P.S - You got no real friends here they just want to take your money.
    The rest is rake.
  • Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
    edited September 2011
    There will always be people making strange calls but if they miss and you win then you will instantly forget about it but if they hit it hurts and you will remember it. Thats why it may feel it happens all the time but it doesnt, the thing is dont let it get under your skin just play your game and remember you will win more of these type of hands than you lose so you want them in the pot! Good luck on the tables, ps Im a Jammy Donut so if I raise and you have Aces just put them down! :D
  • elsadogelsadog Member Posts: 5,677
    edited September 2011
    In Response to A little help here:
    I'm well aware that some will slate this post but a serious question. Does anyone else feel in an MTT that certain players ( who seem to cash consistently ) tend to hit cards more often than most , or maybe that bigger stacks will 90% outdraw smaller stacks. Just out of open - to very good player and regular casher , who i wont name but trust me is a very well known player with huge sucsess , blinds 10 / 20 , i raise to 80 with A A , he makes it 240 , i make it 800 , he calls. flop comes 8 6 5 , i shove expecting him to have K K or Q Q etc , he snaps with 5 5 and to rub salt into wound turns quads!!!! 1. preflop with 1800 stack he calls 800 with 5 5 , really ???? Surely that is shove or fold , and the fact i raised and then re-raised his re raise must tell him he is behind. If he feels im on AK,AQ etc or total rubbish he just shoves surely???? 2. i have experienced similar againts 3 other regular cashers in last 3 or 4 tourneys , am i just being silly or do some players seem to catch pretty much everything they chase? I know as i said at the start that a number of people will say im being ridiculous, but im certain more will agree. Either way let me know your thoughts please Many thanks
    Posted by acerag83

    This was tonight's Open? - A rebuy. He's a successful reg so he will be well bankrolled. He's successful so he plays to win not survive. He's down to 1800 chips. I would do exactly the same with 55 in that situation (it wasnt me was it - poor memory).

    Seen from his point of view he wants to build a stack. In a rebuy that is a different thing altogether from a freezeout mtt. He is prepared to chance it and rebuy if it fails. It's common and sensible tactics in a rebuy to maximise your stack if you can afford it either by being loose aggressive or rebuying. At the close of the rebuy period if I am short stacked I will chip dump to take max rebuys and the add on. It's all about being in contention after the rebuy period ends.
  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    In Response to A little help here : This was tonight's Open? - A rebuy. He's a successful reg so he will be well bankrolled. He's successful so he plays to win not survive. He's down to 1800 chips. I would do exactly the same with 55 in that situation (it wasnt me was it - poor memory). Seen from his point of view he wants to build a stack. In a rebuy that is a different thing altogether from a freezeout mtt. He is prepared to chance it and rebuy if it fails. It's common and sensible tactics in a rebuy to maximise your stack if you can afford it either by being loose aggressive or rebuying. At the close of the rebuy period if I am short stacked I will chip dump to take max rebuys and the add on. It's all about being in contention after the rebuy period ends.
    Posted by elsadog
    Superbly put elsa , but then i expect nothin less xx
  • DUNMIDOSHDUNMIDOSH Member Posts: 1,473
    edited September 2011
    I agree with your post it does appear that large stacks do tend to come off better when it comes down to races.
    Without doubt there are some players who seem to be blessed with river cards from heaven.
    But to be fair if you rail other tournaments they take part in you'll find they are human and do crash out early on a number of occasions.
    The difference between them and us is they have mastered the skill of combining controlled aggression with prudent play. And are probably playing multi tournaments to our one or two.
    When we are on the receiving side of a bad beat it's very easy to convince ourselves that the site is biased but the truth is we forget about the times we make the river to take the pot.
    I used to think that winning on Sky Poker was 95% luck and 5% staying awake but am now a firm believer that Skill and poker awareness will triumph on most occasions!
    What I would say is if you make a mega hand on the flop raise big but don't go all in till the river give yourself a chance to escape miracle bad beats.
     
  • BLACK_MASSBLACK_MASS Member Posts: 401
    edited September 2011
    In all seriousness have you considered this. Say you are considering playing a £10 tourney so it will cost £11.
    Click onto Sky Vegas select roulette. Say you decide to put £5 red or black. Then maybe £3 odd or even. That leaves £3 which could be 3 individual £1 bets on 3 specific numbers.
    Over time this may well offer you a better return on your money. Think of the time you will save too. No waiting around for 2 hours just to get sucked out on by some ditz that decides K-rag represents +ev and winning absolutely nothing. As long as you are disciplined and only invest money earmarked for tourneys you avoid all the frustration and boredom that tourney play causes and be better off financially.
    I strongly suggest that any average or below poker player gives this some thought. The whole operation will take less than 30 seconds. Job's a good'un. No bad beat stories too. Just a simple honest punt for your cash :)
    In the time you save you can read books or watch films. Over a year you will be a lot wiser and happier.
    (Obv. tailor your roulette bets maybe better, i just made it up off the top of my head.)
  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    In all seriousness have you considered this. Say you are considering playing a £10 tourney so it will cost £11. Click onto Sky Vegas select roulette. Say you decide to put £5 red or black. Then maybe £3 odd or even. That leaves £3 which could be 3 individual £1 bets on 3 specific numbers. Over time this may well offer you a better return on your money. Think of the time you will save too. No waiting around for 2 hours just to get sucked out on by some ditz that decides K-rag represents +ev and winning absolutely nothing. As long as you are disciplined and only invest money earmarked for tourneys you avoid all the frustration and boredom that tourney play causes and be better off financially. I strongly suggest that any average or below poker player gives this some thought. The whole operation will take less than 30 seconds. Job's a good'un. No bad beat stories too. Just a simple honest punt for your cash :) In the time you save you can read books or watch films. Over a year you will be a lot wiser and happier. (Obv. tailor your roulette bets maybe better, i just made it up off the top of my head.)
    Posted by BLACK_MASS
    lmao i luved that xx
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited September 2011

    Many bad players have successful records on sky, such as the variance involved in tourny poker.

    Just like Phil Ivey could play 50 sky main events and not final table 1, it's possible for a bad player to go and win 6 in 6 months. 

    It works both ways. 

    The play you described by the villain in the opening post is pretty horrific, unless his plan was to get the rest of his money in on any flop, like a stop and go play.

    Nothing wrong with gambling with pocket 5s in a rebuy, but set mining for half your stack is awful, I agree.

    You can get away with it in tournys though, I see "winning players" do this and stuff worse than this tourny after tourny. It only has to work 1 tourny out of a hundred, they run golden, and on paper show as winning players.

    Fair play to them, you wouldn't want em to change wudya! ;)
  • debdobs_67debdobs_67 Member Posts: 3,615
    edited September 2011
    Yeah i agree dohhh i see lots of players gamble with a pocket pair , even lower sumtimes , i spose it WAS just the call with 55 as ya say 1/2 of their stack which is obv woeful
  • acerag83acerag83 Member Posts: 76
    edited September 2011
    OK everyone , many thanks for your messages , and i have to say this is the exact reason why i love Sky and in particular the community. Honest and helpful responses from players who have had similar experiences, but also players who just want to advise and help whenever possible. All points are taken on board, and i agree fully with most of them.
    Of course i play to win and am realistic of the variance in all poker , especially MTT , your never going to win every flip, but for everytime you get outdrawn you will outdraw someone the next time. Its a game of ups and downs , but for me until im rolled to play every main event everyday, the only thing that matters is enjoying it , and as i have said at the start of this post the people of this community help with that enjoyment and in my opinion having played on a number of different sites over the years , Sky is number 1 by a long way.
    Thanks again for all your input
    P.S - villain in this scenario went on to cash , i watched an hour of their play to see some of the moves they made and to be fair they fully deserved to cash and were unlucky not to go further , so very well done to them
  • elsadogelsadog Member Posts: 5,677
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    Many bad players have successful records on sky, such as the variance involved in tourny poker. Just like Phil Ivey could play 50 sky main events and not final table 1, it's possible for a bad player to go and win 6 in 6 months.  It works both ways.  The play you described by the villain in the opening post is pretty horrific, unless his plan was to get the rest of his money in on any flop, like a stop and go play. Nothing wrong with gambling with pocket 5s in a rebuy, but set mining for half your stack is awful, I agree. You can get away with it in tournys though, I see "winning players" do this and stuff worse than this tourny after tourny. It only has to work 1 tourny out of a hundred, they run golden, and on paper show as winning players. Fair play to them, you wouldn't want em to change wudya! ;)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    What a load of tosh!!!
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited September 2011
    1) Many bad players have successful records on sky, such as the variance involved in tourny poker.

    U don't agree with this? If I sent u a list of 10 names, I'm sure you would agree they are bad players.

    2) , it's possible for a bad player to go and win 6 in 6 months

    How can you possibly disagree with this? It's a fact, any plonker can win a poker tournament, and alot of plonkers do.

    3)  You can get away with it in tournys though, I see "winning players" do this and stuff worse than this tourny after tourny.

    I will note any examples that I see over the next week or so, and paste the hand histories to you via PM, and see if you agree with me. (not everyday mistakes, serious "that musta been a misclick?" kinda mistakes)


  • elsadogelsadog Member Posts: 5,677
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    1)  Many bad players have successful records on sky, such as the variance involved in tourny poker. U don't agree with this? If I sent u a list of 10 names, I'm sure you would agree they are bad players. 2)  ,  it's possible for a bad player to go and win 6 in 6 months .  How can you possibly disagree with this? It's a fact, any plonker can win a poker tournament, and alot of plonkers do. 3)   You can get away with it in tournys though, I see "winning players" do this and stuff worse than this tourny after tourny . I will note any examples that I see over the next week or so, and paste the hand histories to you via PM, and see if you agree with me. (not everyday mistakes, serious "that musta been a misclick?" kinda mistakes)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH

    You've always had this bee in your bonnet JJ. Anyone can win a tournament yes, as a one off. Doing it time after time is another thing entirely. The OP post was regarding the ME. To win 6 ME's in 6 months is quite a feat for any proficient mtt player. If your talking about 25 seat mtts then that's completely different. I would still contest that they would be profitable though.

    The player mentioned in the OP had a very good reason to chance it with 55. It was a rebuy. How you can comment on his ability without knowing any of the facts preceding that play or for that matter who the player is, well it's beyond me. I offered a possible explanation for the play based around the fact that it was a rebuy. You seem to either not understand the difference or choose to ignore it.

    As far as making mistakes is concerned, well all poker players make mistakes, whatever form or level they play in. As far as ''many bad players having successful records'' that to me is a conflicting statement.

    You've always held the belief that mtt players are inferior to cash players and that's you prerogative. I think they are different disciplines of the same game. I wonder why all the good cash players grind away every day when they could simply play a few big mtt's a week and win them all. The truth is there are good cash players and good stt players and good mtt players. Some of the very good players can switch between disciplines, most can't.

    Personally I regard myself as an mtt player. I can and have turned my hand to cash with success but I prefer the mtt. That as far as I am concerned is a personal choice. I'm sure that whatever any player chooses to play it's personal to them. There are many cash players I don't relish being on my table in an mtt, but there are also a lot of mtt players I would be wary of at a cash table.

    You're a proficient cash player at 15/30 and I'm sure that with a little more practice and development you too could do well at mtts. After all as you said, anyone can be successful at mtts.
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    In Response to Re: A little help here : You've always had this bee in your bonnet JJ. Anyone can win a tournament yes, as a one off. Doing it time after time is another thing entirely. The OP post was regarding the ME. To win 6 ME's in 6 months is quite a feat for any proficient mtt player. If your talking about 25 seat mtts then that's completely different. I would still contest that they would be profitable though. The player mentioned in the OP had a very good reason to chance it with 55. It was a rebuy. How you can comment on his ability without knowing any of the facts preceding that play or for that matter who the player is, well it's beyond me. I offered a possible explanation for the play based around the fact that it was a rebuy. You seem to either not understand the difference or choose to ignore it. As far as making mistakes is concerned, well all poker players make mistakes, whatever form or level they play in. As far as ''many bad players having successful records'' that to me is a conflicting statement. You've always held the belief that mtt players are inferior to cash players and that's you prerogative. I think they are different disciplines of the same game. I wonder why all the good cash players grind away every day when they could simply play a few big mtt's a week and win them all. The truth is there are good cash players and good stt players and good mtt players. Some of the very good players can switch between disciplines, most can't. Personally I regard myself as an mtt player. I can and have turned my hand to cash with success but I prefer the mtt. That as far as I am concerned is a personal choice. I'm sure that whatever any player chooses to play it's personal to them. There are many cash players I don't relish being on my table in an mtt, but there are also a lot of mtt players I would be wary of at a cash table. You're a proficient cash player at 15/30 and I'm sure that with a little more practice and development you too could do well at mtts. After all as you said, anyone can be successful at mtts.
    Posted by elsadog
    1) Because not even the best MTT player in the World could do this.

    2) I already do. I do alot better at MTTs than some better MTT players than myself do. I also do alot worse than players who are nowhere near as good as myself. That's MTT's for ya innit.

    As you know from my 100's of A51 posts, I, and we, should want these bad players to keep playing bad, and the more they bink, the more deluded they will become, and in the end, the more they will lose.

    I aint into the game of berating players worse than myself. That's like taking a voluntary pay-cut imo. It makes no sense. 

    There is no way in a million years that alot of "successful" tourny players on sky will continue to be "successful" unless they improve. 

    Which is all good.

    Talking about a minority of course, over a proper sample, most players will deserve the records they have got. 

    Duz tilt me loads like! But it's good for the game :)
  • waller02waller02 Member Posts: 9,121
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    1)  Many bad players have successful records on sky, such as the variance involved in tourny poker. U don't agree with this? If I sent u a list of 10 names, I'm sure you would agree they are bad players. 2)  ,  it's possible for a bad player to go and win 6 in 6 months .  How can you possibly disagree with this? It's a fact, any plonker can win a poker tournament, and alot of plonkers do. 3)   You can get away with it in tournys though, I see "winning players" do this and stuff worse than this tourny after tourny . I will note any examples that I see over the next week or so, and paste the hand histories to you via PM, and see if you agree with me. (not everyday mistakes, serious "that musta been a misclick?" kinda mistakes)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH
    i think it depends on what you class as a bad player.........i have to disagree, although i think there are many players of an average standard who are winning players, myself included (unless i am on ur list of 10?) lol

    imo, there is a big gulf between bad and average and can't see how a bad player can be a winning player long term.......you don't have to be particularly good to be a winning player but you certainly have to be better than bad.....just my opinion
  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    In Response to Re: A little help here : i think it depends on what you class as a bad player.........i have to disagree, although i think there are many players of an average standard who are winning players, myself included (unless i am on ur list of 10?) lol imo, there is a big gulf between bad and average and can't see how a bad player can be a winning player long term.......you don't have to be particularly good to be a winning player but you certainly have to be better than bad.....just my opinion
    Posted by waller02
    Haven't seen your stats, but imo, you're better than alot of players that are 8k+ up on sky.


  • elsadogelsadog Member Posts: 5,677
    edited September 2011
    In Response to Re: A little help here:
    In Response to Re: A little help here : 1) Because not even the best MTT player in the World could do this. 2) I already do. I do alot better at MTTs than some better MTT players than myself do. I also do alot worse than players who are nowhere near as good as myself. That's MTT's for ya innit. As you know from my 100's of A51 posts, I, and we, should want these bad players to keep playing bad, and the more they bink, the more deluded they will become, and in the end, the more they will lose. I aint into the game of berating players worse than myself. That's like taking a voluntary pay-cut imo. It makes no sense.  There is no way in a million years that alot of "successful" tourny players on sky will continue to be "successful" unless they improve.  Which is all good. Talking about a minority of course, over a proper sample, most players will deserve the records they have got.  Duz tilt me loads like! But it's good for the game :)
    Posted by DOHHHHHHH


    Have you been on the pop all day? This is nonsense.

    What measure of ''good'' are you using?

    Sleep it off JJ.

  • DOHHHHHHHDOHHHHHHH Member Posts: 17,929
    edited September 2011
    Haha no not at all. haven't even played a hand of proper poker yet so nowhere near drunk.

    Again, I can give you a list of names, better than me, with worse records, and worse than me, with better records.

    And see if you agree.

    I'm positive you will agree. It'll be quite obvious really when you see the list of names.
  • pod1pod1 Member Posts: 4,377
    edited September 2011
    to be fair i think you are both right.  like elsa says there's mtts and then there's mtts. and dohhhh your right i know many many players that have binked tourny wins who are that bad they use there fingers to count if they have a straight. how are you classing having a successful record, money one? roi? cashs/ games played. does winning a tournament for 10k make you 10x better than someone who won one for 1k (thats a lot of 1!!!!).ps dohhh,you say we want bad players to continue to play bad,but you keep handing out good advice, and now you have been promoted to "guru" status by blackmass,gord help us x
Sign In or Register to comment.