I obv fold pre mate BUT i dont like rich's play either as i wanna build a bigger pot with my AA so i think long term a 3bet should be happening in this spot.
About a year from now Will48 will look back on this thread (if he lasts that long in the online poker world playing this way that is) and will lol at himself for even putting this thread up and realise that every post he thinks is supporting him on here are actually being sarcastic
Until then though this post shows that everyone has to start somewhere and that what one person sees happening in a pot can be totally different to what others see.
All i can add to this is best of luck at the tables Will48 mate and please make sure you post alot more of your hands in the clinic
Class thread lol About a year from now Will48 will look back on this thread (if he lasts that long in the online poker world playing this way that is) and will lol at himself for even putting this thread up and realise that every post he thinks is supporting him on here are actually being sarcastic Until then though this post shows that everyone has to start somewhere and that what one person sees happening in a pot can be totally different to what others see. All i can add to this is best of luck at the tables Will48 mate and please make sure you post alot more of your hands in the clinic Posted by paythedr24
luvly spot on post here , i just hope the op reads it , unless of course he wants to play at my tables , then i hope he doesnt )
In Response to Re: i beat the presenter lol : Hand History #449844863 (21:46 14/12/2011) Posted by will48
every one has there oppinions on this and i wasnt out for praise or anything maybe i did play it bad but my point is why did the presenter not re raise offshoot preflop to get value
In Response to Re: i beat the presenter lol : every one has there oppinions on this and i wasnt out for praise or anything maybe i did play it bad but my point is why did the presenter not re raise offshoot preflop to get value Posted by will48
Why ?
Indeed why does orford flat, if orford 3 bets – kinda telegraphs his hand to offshoot -
Frankly flatting here has so many benefits that far outweigh 3 betting versus certain oppo
Does orford know why he is flatting here, that’s the real question !
In Response to Re: i beat the presenter lol : its ok for people like lolufold to play bad and win yeah sarcasm i watch poker tv and see top of the pots and the size of there bets and the rubbish they bet with is unreal am i supposed to sit tight and wait fro aa and then get beat na dont think so lol Posted by will48
In Response to Re: i beat the presenter lol : why ill tell u why rich flatted cause he thought he was gonna get re raised again by another lad that was crazy playin and the lad folded so i called knowing that i was getting a cheap flop if rich plan had worked the crazy dude wuda re raised as he had in previous hands and i wuda folded then it wuda been rich hand for the taking but rich cant take chances withh aa he has to re raise and he never thats why he lost and if he up against jj or qq if he re raises he gonna get more value Posted by will48
but anyway if you can’t see why you would flat in the spot then I think your playing too high a level
likewise 3 betting here would also give the same effect if orford was an aggro 3 bet wide kind of guy – but I am sure he has not got that image tbh so hence the flat
Sorry for thread hijack, but could I have played this hand any differently? Can't help but think I should've paid the big blind instead of sitting out, got dealt 72o, min raised, and flopped a full house. Thoughts?
Comments
Its 100NL and rich is on btn facing a co open, if this terrifies offshoot into folding JJ hes prob doing it wrong
OP played his hand badly. Its also his first post here basically. Cut him some slack give him some advice, no need to slate him
I'll start:
buy in full
fold pre, once you limp fold to raise
prob play lower than 100NL till you understand why limpcalling pre here is bad
Also for anyone who ever posted in unl on 2+2 , this is classic gateswi theorem
not really sure ) Guess v a co open it's actually very good considering aggro oppo
I am sure orfords is perceived to have a narrow 3 bet value range
About a year from now Will48 will look back on this thread (if he lasts that long in the online poker world playing this way that is) and will lol at himself for even putting this thread up and realise that every post he thinks is supporting him on here are actually being sarcastic
Until then though this post shows that everyone has to start somewhere and that what one person sees happening in a pot can be totally different to what others see.
All i can add to this is best of luck at the tables Will48 mate and please make sure you post alot more of your hands in the clinic
Why ?
Indeed why does orford flat, if orford 3 bets – kinda telegraphs his hand to offshoot -
Frankly flatting here has so many benefits that far outweigh 3 betting versus certain oppo
Does orford know why he is flatting here, that’s the real question !
Triple balanced merged polarized range :S
but anyway if you can’t see why you would flat in the spot then I think your playing too high a level
likewise 3 betting here would also give the same effect if orford was an aggro 3 bet wide kind of guy – but I am sure he has not got that image tbh so hence the flat
Lambert its quite obviously Benno is being sarcastic or he wants him to keep making speculative limp/calls
7♠ 7♦ 2♣
K♠
Q♥
7♥ K♦
K♥ J♦
6♦ Q♦
WP sure your going to win loads of monies with this calling