Alot of people will say don't even bother putting the extra 2p in pre flop because more often than not you'll either completely miss the flop or hit it and be completely dominated. But that aside, you should bet the flop and on the turn be trying your hardest to get stacks in the middle. Unlucky on the river but yeah as I said, you should have lost alot more really, so at least you've learnt your lesson (hopefully) on the cheap.
Turn bet pot or near to it, you check minraise here which is REALLY bad as you lose MASSIVE value, got to be more, he then clicks it back and you make larger raise than min but still can make it more.
River shove as you could be losing 14p with that bet which is just unecessary.
Got to be honest I dont get the fold pre line in the slightest. We are getting 7/1 with a hand of potential. Pos doesnt really matter. Would we bin a host of worse hands? 25os through JQs getting 7/1 with 1 plyr left to act? No.
By saying folding pre we are basically saying we dont trust ourselves to play solid post flop poker, that we will lose money with marginal holdings. We should know what we want/dont want to see.
If we have faith in our ability to lose min gain max then auto folding in these spots is just plain bizarre to me.
I just prefer to be drawing to the nuts if I do flop FD, yes someone else having Ax of hearts is unlikely but I'd rather not get in to those reverse implied odds merky waters.
Absoloutely, and everything inbetween. There isnt a hand I would fold in all honesty.
You know me, I know the arguments for and against. But personally speaking, if I can take a multiway flop getting 7/1 with 1plyr to act behind am always taking it.
If we make a habit of paying off light then no. But just comes down to your confidence in losing min vbing max. Would we prefer it to be KhJh? obv. Would we lose any less vs Ah5h on connected board? Prob not.
I just dont understand why people would deny themselves solid equity vs oppo's they perceive as weak. Well......I understand the argument obv, but I dont agree with it
True to a degree, but its not hard for a micro stakes to stack off in reality is it?
The High variance in micro stakes comes from being called down light at wrong price and improving (pot being over inflated when they bink) and AIPF spots, not by oppos outplaying you or taking strong lines where you are forced give up marginal edges. But our VB's will get paid at a high frequency. Position doesnt even come into it for me. All I hear is 7/1 vs players we can be confident we have an edge over.
We are going to know quickly if we are behind or if there is any point continuing in any given hand. So to not take it up @ 7/1 with money invested is beyond my compehension.
7/1 odds are good yes, but at nl4 you can easily find a better spot with a stronger hand. with K3 and other hands in sb there is no need to make up the blinds and get into multi way pots. there is no need to bleed money on the off chance you hit strong
Got to be honest I dont get the fold pre line in the slightest. We are getting 7/1 with a hand of potential. Pos doesnt really matter. Would we bin a host of worse hands? 25os through JQs getting 7/1 with 1 plyr left to act? No. By saying folding pre we are basically saying we dont trust ourselves to play solid post flop poker, that we will lose money with marginal holdings. We should know what we want/dont want to see. If we have faith in our ability to lose min gain max then auto folding in these spots is just plain bizarre to me. Posted by AMYBR
I think we can prob call pre here, but I think you are overstating how profitable calling is
7/1 isnt really that important a figure here when there is so much money behind compared to currently in pot, although obv its nice to have good direct odds. What happens to the 100BB behind is whats really important
Position is really important with this kind of hand as it allows us to control potsize (whether we want to make it big or control it) much better, which is important when we hit big or want to see an extra card. This is a big factor in our ability to lose min/win max you talk about
We have no specific reads, although the fact they are prob bad 4NL players is obv in our favour . Some of them are shallow which is not in our favour
Also, and this is a very small consideration, if any coolering occurs we are likely to be on the wrong side of it with this kind of hand
You say somewhere in one of your posts its fine once we are clear in our objectives. What exactly are your objectives
To simply be confident in our ability to lose min gain max as said. To be able to take advantage of windows of opportunity and be diciplined enough to not lose money in precarious spots.
You know as well as I do that in each comment you mention above, the reasoning can swing both ways.
I know both arguments as said. I just personally believe we are denying ourselves opportunities by folding in these spots if we are solid players.
Are we good post? yes/no? Do we feel we have an edge over oppo? Yes/No. Are we getting a reasonable price on our money (with money ivested?? Yes/No. Do we want our game to be this uber nitty? Yes/no. Do we sometimes have to get a little action to set up action later? Yes/No?
Seems like there are more questions and more yes's.
Comments
I bet flop/turn mostly. Cant help river
Alot of people will say don't even bother putting the extra 2p in pre flop because more often than not you'll either completely miss the flop or hit it and be completely dominated. But that aside, you should bet the flop and on the turn be trying your hardest to get stacks in the middle. Unlucky on the river but yeah as I said, you should have lost alot more really, so at least you've learnt your lesson (hopefully) on the cheap.
EDIT: calling period any player type.
flop fine imo, you prob can bet also, but with limited fe oop I think checking is fine
bet turn, as played shove over his 3bet
river betr enough to put him all in
Ax on sb depends how I'm playing!
on flop as played I'm half/2 quarters pot betting.
same on turn and if reraised I am shoving as at nl4 it says 2 pair or set
river - unlucky
By saying folding pre we are basically saying we dont trust ourselves to play solid post flop poker, that we will lose money with marginal holdings. We should know what we want/dont want to see.
If we have faith in our ability to lose min gain max then auto folding in these spots is just plain bizarre to me.
You know me, I know the arguments for and against. But personally speaking, if I can take a multiway flop getting 7/1 with 1plyr to act behind am always taking it.
If we make a habit of paying off light then no. But just comes down to your confidence in losing min vbing max. Would we prefer it to be KhJh? obv. Would we lose any less vs Ah5h on connected board? Prob not.
I just dont understand why people would deny themselves solid equity vs oppo's they perceive as weak. Well......I understand the argument obv, but I dont agree with it
The High variance in micro stakes comes from being called down light at wrong price and improving (pot being over inflated when they bink) and AIPF spots, not by oppos outplaying you or taking strong lines where you are forced give up marginal edges. But our VB's will get paid at a high frequency. Position doesnt even come into it for me. All I hear is 7/1 vs players we can be confident we have an edge over.
We are going to know quickly if we are behind or if there is any point continuing in any given hand. So to not take it up @ 7/1 with money invested is beyond my compehension.
with K3 and other hands in sb there is no need to make up the blinds and get into multi way pots. there is no need to bleed money on the off chance you hit strong
fair enough
I just wouldn't with K3 in the sb normally
by the way, hope your running good
7/1 isnt really that important a figure here when there is so much money behind compared to currently in pot, although obv its nice to have good direct odds. What happens to the 100BB behind is whats really important
Position is really important with this kind of hand as it allows us to control potsize (whether we want to make it big or control it) much better, which is important when we hit big or want to see an extra card. This is a big factor in our ability to lose min/win max you talk about
We have no specific reads, although the fact they are prob bad 4NL players is obv in our favour . Some of them are shallow which is not in our favour
Also, and this is a very small consideration, if any coolering occurs we are likely to be on the wrong side of it with this kind of hand
You say somewhere in one of your posts its fine once we are clear in our objectives. What exactly are your objectives
You know as well as I do that in each comment you mention above, the reasoning can swing both ways.
I know both arguments as said. I just personally believe we are denying ourselves opportunities by folding in these spots if we are solid players.
Are we good post? yes/no? Do we feel we have an edge over oppo? Yes/No. Are we getting a reasonable price on our money (with money ivested?? Yes/No. Do we want our game to be this uber nitty? Yes/no. Do we sometimes have to get a little action to set up action later? Yes/No?
Seems like there are more questions and more yes's.