You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
KK issues. What is it with KK on-line. Never wins
nug82
Member Posts: 82
| Player | Action | Cards | Amount | Pot | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bigscot | Small blind | 50.00 | 50.00 | 5350.00 | |
| nug82 | Big blind | 100.00 | 150.00 | 3505.00 | |
| Your hole cards |
| ||||
| Hauffish | Fold | ||||
| clyde1313 | Fold | ||||
| zxghostxz | Fold | ||||
| steph1977 | All-in | 965.00 | 1115.00 | 0.00 | |
| bigscot | Call | 915.00 | 2030.00 | 4435.00 | |
| nug82 | All-in | 3505.00 | 5535.00 | 0.00 | |
| bigscot | Call | 2640.00 | 8175.00 | 1795.00 | |
| bigscot | Show |
| |||
| nug82 | Show |
| |||
| steph1977 | Show |
| |||
| Flop | |||||
| |||||
| Turn | |||||
| |||||
| River | |||||
| |||||
| bigscot | Win | Two Pairs, 9s and 8s | 8175.00 | 9970.00 | |
Comments
Kam99 is right heads up you'll win 80% of the time, 3 way you'll win 66% of the time (in a perfect world) with 'bingo' players it more like 50/50 with every hand
#bitter haha
Nice to know that people agree this was a sick exit hand.
V6 thank you for that information, I will note that going forward.
...oh hang on, that does happen!
I believe in the VLV for March, someone who got a seat was down to a very short stack and managed to beat the Sky system of 'bigger stacks always winning all-ins'
I made my only 2 bluff shoves it 2 games yesterday and both times bb had kk....both won
On big stacks vs small. Actually wouldn't surprise me if the big stacks win a larger percentage of the all ins. Why? Well often because short stacks will be shoving with quite wide range, and often the person that makes a call has the stronger hand. Also, someone said above about needing samples of millions.. well you don't really need that many, but you'd certainly need sample size in the region of 100,000 to be getting variance down to some where in the 1% margin area, and in some cases more hands. Not something easy to do on sky as is currently of course.
The main point is that you as a human CANNOT possibly see and remember the data to see true patterns. You'll see patterns in short sample sizes and trick your brain, which is the curse of most novices at the game, and what leads to most of the "its rigged" type talks/thread etc.
As for how I know. Yes I may play here, but I also play other places, and on other sites I can use pokertracker (go google it), which means I can keep a database of ALL the hands i've every played and look at if they are matching up with the the statistics they should do over a large volume. I can see if I'm dealt hands as often as I should, if they won as often as expected. What the flops were, and if flush draws were making it as often as they should or more so.. How often my PP's are making sets... and so on. Basically I can check anything I want.
So my point is my comments are based on 5-6 years of online play and a whole history of hands. So thats my reasoning being my posts, and from what I can see your basing assumptions on a few hands you remember, right? And no offense by we just can't remember enough for that to work. Only hands poker players remember long term is generally the badbeats.