You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Main and Mini freerolls, Thoughts please including sky itself :)

kidwiz10kidwiz10 Member Posts: 569
edited July 2012 in Poker Chat
Just a quick idea as i thought about this

Personally i think there a waste of time ino it was nice of sky to introduce em to boost the main mumbers and that but to the ordianry joe who playes the main n mini most night of the week there pointless
eg

£50 fr 400 runners    1st />£12.50

£200 fr 400 runners  1st />£50

For about 3 hours play just aint worth the effort and most players who play day in day out aint gunna bother with these at all

What i suggest:

Instead of a daily mini and main freeroll junk them

A weekly freeroll eg

Players who cash in either the main or the mini from mon/sat get entry to

£1500 freeroll on the sunday

So my guess there would be between 400/500 runners with 1st offering around £300

This would be a much better idea and its worth the time to play , can keep the same freeroll structure n that 

Thoughts and input be good




«1

Comments

  • POKERTREVPOKERTREV Member Posts: 9,607
    edited July 2012
    If you don't like them, just sit away.

    I've Cashed in 2 from 3 Can't say NO to FREE Money imo
  • kidwiz10kidwiz10 Member Posts: 569
    edited July 2012
    I do sit away its the 1st time ive actually bothered to play it tonight!

    I didnt say i didnt like em i just said there pointless and not worth the time of day to players who play the main and mini day in day out as a weekly tourny would be a better option

    Im just making a point everyone is always sat out and i wouldnt class playing 2 hours for a 40p min cash as worfit! hence why i do sit out

    I was just stating my opinion on what i thought would be a better idea and as DONK pointed out bigger prizepool and something worth playing for

    O and btw i "came 2nd in main tonight £30!!" brag post never , to go through 409 runners and 10th paying £2 exactly my point , not having a rant but wanted inputs not sarcy comments on FREE CASH eg
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited July 2012
    Ive played these the last few nights and i have to say i really enjoy them. I believe if you dislike them you can also de-reg, but behing honest, why are you complaining of getting £50 or £12.50 for NO INVESTMENT. The only investment you have to do is think for 3 hours. Very few freerolls on any site give mre than £50 to the winner unless theres a special reason - normally new players or a massive event or a multiple freeroll venture where you hae to win like 90 million freerolls before you cash. 


    Anyways what im saying is Thanks sky for putting these on. Today i cashed in the mini, on Wednessday i cashed in mini. Ive cashed in 2 of these freerolls, both for small amounts, but meh i still cashed, i still got some pennys i put nothing in to gain. 

    IMO WIN WIN WIN. 


  • CrazyBen23CrazyBen23 Member Posts: 865
    edited July 2012
    Agreed, but my main point is that this also applies to skys tournaments due to the dreadful payout structure. In most main events for example you can play for 3 hour, get a min cash and have a steady profit of £1.47. No thank you. Same also applies if you get 11th - 20th, instead you may be lucky enough to get a tasty £6.74 profit. Solution? Pay less people 
  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited July 2012
    In Response to Re: Main and Mini freerolls, Thoughts please including sky itself :):
    Agreed, but my main point is that this also applies to skys tournaments due to the dreadful payout structure. In most main events for example you can play for 3 hour, get a min cash and have a steady profit of £1.47. No thank you. Same also applies if you get 11th - 20th, instead you may be lucky enough to get a tasty £6.74 profit. Solution? Pay less people 
    Posted by CrazyBen23
    Really you want to pay less? 

    Weaker players play to min cash it keeps them in the game simple. If they didnt min cash and break even theyd not cash not reload and not play again. If you ask me, pay more. less ftw but weaker players would be more common. 

    So in theory imo its fine as it is. 

    Although i would agree that an odd "winner takes all" tournament would be a good idea. 
  • kidwiz10kidwiz10 Member Posts: 569
    edited July 2012
    Im not complaining about the freerolls as i pointed out in the first place it was nice of Sky

    I only suggested that maybe having a weekly version with more money on offer than several small ones might sound more appealing

    I agree with CRAZY on the payout structure for freerools no1 wants to play all that time for pence in return free or not still wanna make it worth the time
  • Kiwini4uKiwini4u Member Posts: 3,830
    edited July 2012
    I played my first one of these last night and for the first 45 minutes all I did was hit the raise/muck buttons as all the other players at my table were away.  I'm not complaining because its an easy way to build up a chip stack, but my point is that Sky either have to publicise these new games more or perhaps make it an option that when you register for the Main/Mini you have to tick a box to say if you want to play in the following nights freeroll, that way there will a) be fewer away players & b) the prize pool won't be so spread out.
  • bolesAAbolesAA Member Posts: 282
    edited July 2012
    In my opinion they are a little bit of a waste of time. I totally agree with the points made above that it is good for sky to introduce them and its a chance of free money etc. The problem is just because people can play on one night, does not mean they are avaiable on the next one to play. Further to this they start quite late, especially for people who are up early in the mornings for work. 

    I like the idea of them, but I agree they need to make a bigger deal out of them to generate interest. I beleive a weekly one may do that. If not why not play them on the same night or if they wish to continue having them on the next night, why not start them at say half 7.. 

    Andy 
  • kidwiz10kidwiz10 Member Posts: 569
    edited July 2012

    Yea i was i nthe same place as you kiwini raise raise as wer only player on my table

    To be honest i think at least half the field was away the whole tourney was good for me yea but bored the pants off me!

  • aussie09aussie09 Member Posts: 8,033
    edited July 2012

    think of it more as an incentive rather than a reward.  a small incentive to encourage people to play successive nights. 





  • The_Don90The_Don90 Member Posts: 9,818
    edited July 2012
    In Response to Re: Main and Mini freerolls, Thoughts please including sky itself :):
    In my opinion they are a little bit of a waste of time. I totally agree with the points made above that it is good for sky to introduce them and its a chance of free money etc. The problem is just because people can play on one night, does not mean they are avaiable on the next one to play. Further to this they start quite late, especially for people who are up early in the mornings for work.  I like the idea of them, but I agree they need to make a bigger deal out of them to generate interest. I beleive a weekly one may do that. If not why not play them on the same night or if they wish to continue having them on the next night, why not start them at say half 7..  Andy 
    Posted by bolesAA
    As a small bonus maybe add a jackpot style thing for someone who wins both freerolls. Not as big as the actual jackpot by maybe a few bob. 
  • Batkin88Batkin88 Member Posts: 1,682
    edited July 2012
    If you think about the times of the freerolls you will prob understand why they run daily ones. They want people back each night to boost each ME on consecutive nights. Try to remember SKY is a business and although it is free there is a reason behind them running it.
    I won't play them unless I am bored and then I will just donk about, but I can see why it is there and hopefully it will push the ME numbers up daily.
  • SwogSwog Member Posts: 488
    edited July 2012

    not SKY's best ideas.

  • GREGHOGGGREGHOGG Member Posts: 7,155
    edited July 2012

    I think any bonuses are great, and these freerolls suit some people and are good fun. (i go all in every hand lol)

    Personally, i like the idea of a weekly freeroll if you play 4 mains or 4 minis in one week. so instead of one £200 freeroll per day it would be 1 £1400 or £350 freeroll per week, and the number of runners will be reduced as you will have to have played 4 events to quailfy. Also a nicer prizes up top. Then i will just go all in every other hand instead :)


  • cenachavcenachav Member Posts: 2,682
    edited July 2012
    In Response to Re: Main and Mini freerolls, Thoughts please including sky itself :):
    I think any bonuses are great, and these freerolls suit some people and are good fun. (i go all in every hand lol) Personally, i like the idea of a weekly freeroll if you play 4 mains or 4 minis in one week. so instead of one £200 freeroll per day it would be 1 £1400 or £350 freeroll per week, and the number of runners will be reduced as you will have to have played 4 events to quailfy. Also a nicer prizes up top. Then i will just go all in every other hand instead :)
    Posted by GREGHOGG
    So you play freerolls the same as you do normal poker then Greg :).  Personally I only go all in when I have 62 off
  • huuuuumehuuuuume Member Posts: 569
    edited July 2012
    i can see why sky have introduced them because there were no end of players moaning about lower stakes players not getting any rewards e.g. the new cash for points system.  probably would have been a good idea to give some indication to players that they were doing this as i had no clue at all what it was when it popped up.

    but
    i would love to know how many people these freerolls encourage to the site every day because i cant see the number being high at all. 

    if its a reward for tournament players then do a league system with a big reward at the end of the month/week.  allocate points for each cash position and then the top 10 at the end of each month play a big freeroll. this would also help to solve some of the issues regarding payments in tournaments as it would boost the value of a min cash because it could improve your league position.  

    there is already an excellent thread containing all tournament results and the player who updates the thread takes 10 minutes to collate results.  wouldnt take a lot of effort.

    i can see OP's frustration and in all honesty i will be one of those players who are sat out at the tables.  although all freerolls are beneficial in theory it just seems like there are so many better ways to reward players or incentivise players
  • Lambert180Lambert180 Member Posts: 12,197
    edited July 2012
    In Response to Re: Main and Mini freerolls, Thoughts please including sky itself :):
    i can see why sky have introduced them because there were no end of players moaning about lower stakes players not getting any rewards e.g. the new cash for points system.  probably would have been a good idea to give some indication to players that they were doing this as i had no clue at all what it was when it popped up. but i would love to know how many people these freerolls encourage to the site every day because i cant see the number being high at all.  if its a reward for tournament players then do a league system with a big reward at the end of the month/week.  allocate points for each cash position and then the top 10 at the end of each month play a big freeroll. this would also help to solve some of the issues regarding payments in tournaments as it would boost the value of a min cash because it could improve your league position.   there is already an excellent thread containing all tournament results and the player who updates the thread takes 10 minutes to collate results.  wouldnt take a lot of effort. i can see OP's frustration and in all honesty i will be one of those players who are sat out at the tables.  although all freerolls are beneficial in theory it just seems like there are so many better ways to reward players or incentivise players
    Posted by huuuuume
    I'm not moaning at you Huuuume, I generally agree with most things you put on the forum, but if this was the thought process then it's very flawed.

    Low stakes players don't tend to play alot of MEs and as for the Minis, it is a freeroll and 'free money'  but it is a £50 freeroll, and these run daily anyway without having to play the mini to get entry.

    So it adds little value for low stakes players.
  • macapacamacapaca Member Posts: 658
    edited July 2012
    Personally i think sky are wasting £250 a night on these freerolls.

    I thionk thyey could save this money and spend it else where.

    Most of us players playing the main especially are rolled for the £11, £22, £33 and £55 buy ins, so why would we sit in a freeroll with 300 playersish to win pennys??

    I may be wrong but this is just my opinion!!
  • macapacamacapaca Member Posts: 658
    edited July 2012
    Maybe put the full £250 for a freeroll for players playing the mini??????

    Just an idea!!
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 173,643
    edited July 2012

    Good afternoon.

    The Main & Mini Freerolls are done for very good reason, which several replies have correctly identified.
Sign In or Register to comment.