I got 2 questions for Ryan that might inspire some interesting debate...
1. I think it's getting to be pretty accepted for the most part that some people play satellites for cash. What is your view on people playing SPT satellites when they've already qualified? With so many people being so desperate for a seat do you think it's a moral issue at all or are you of the opinion 'if I pay my rake, I can do what I like'? Is there any difference between sats where you play and all-in sats for the above? Obviously it's long term bad to play all-in sats that are full, but ones with large overlay are +EV obv.
2. Have you heard of the theory posted online about how flops that are K high with 2 low cards are great boards to just bet bet bet because SO often people won't have a hand that can stand up to 3 barrels. Like on K26 in a raised pot, there is literally about 3 hands that anyone will ever be able to withstand calling down 3 barrels. If so, what do you think of the theory? Obviously a caveat to that is assuming that our opponent is a thinking player.
I would just like to add to Lamberts SPT sat question.
I have already qualified for it but last night played all 3 'all in' sats that Sky Poker put on. Not one made their 55 runner break even mark. There were only 31/28/34 runners in each. Out of the 3, 2 new players got a seat and one player got the cash equivalent.
I am purely playing them to win some beer money and now Scouse Red has got in, I may need to win two.
All that matters about poker being classed as gambling, is that the HMRC class it as gambling,thereby ensuring that we don't pax on winnings. As long as they think there's no skill involved,we can keep all our moniez.
Hey Guys, I got 2 questions for Ryan that might inspire some interesting debate... 1. I think it's getting to be pretty accepted for the most part that some people play satellites for cash. What is your view on people playing SPT satellites when they've already qualified? With so many people being so desperate for a seat do you think it's a moral issue at all or are you of the opinion 'if I pay my rake, I can do what I like'? Is there any difference between sats where you play and all-in sats for the above? Obviously it's long term bad to play all-in sats that are full, but ones with large overlay are +EV obv. 2. Have you heard of the theory posted online about how flops that are K high with 2 low cards are great boards to just bet bet bet because SO often people won't have a hand that can stand up to 3 barrels. Like on K26 in a raised pot, there is literally about 3 hands that anyone will ever be able to withstand calling down 3 barrels. If so, what do you think of the theory? Obviously a caveat to that is assuming that our opponent is a thinking player. Posted by Lambert180
I've entered all three of tonights "all in" sats because I'll be busy when they take place. So I think they are different from normal Sats. But I tell you what, If I win more than one All in. If Sky let me, I'll buy your action in the SPT I think your odds are 2500/1 but i'll keep my word if it happens
For tonight's topic...All I want for Christmas... is to get off this Primo table; SoLack, DivsDreams, Style2737 and the 2nd place in chips...easy table...not
AA Bounty's Cowboys Dominating cards Everybody folding Free entry into a tourny Get there on the river Hit on the flop Idonkcallu at my table Joker Kickers playing Ladies Monster hand Nuts Overpairs Position Quads Rakeback Set Tikays words of wisdom Unlimited Poker Value White Meat Xtra Chips (sorry slacking here) Yoyo as my tutor ZZZZZZZZZ
Comments
I got 2 questions for Ryan that might inspire some interesting debate...
1. I think it's getting to be pretty accepted for the most part that some people play satellites for cash. What is your view on people playing SPT satellites when they've already qualified? With so many people being so desperate for a seat do you think it's a moral issue at all or are you of the opinion 'if I pay my rake, I can do what I like'? Is there any difference between sats where you play and all-in sats for the above? Obviously it's long term bad to play all-in sats that are full, but ones with large overlay are +EV obv.
2. Have you heard of the theory posted online about how flops that are K high with 2 low cards are great boards to just bet bet bet because SO often people won't have a hand that can stand up to 3 barrels. Like on K26 in a raised pot, there is literally about 3 hands that anyone will ever be able to withstand calling down 3 barrels. If so, what do you think of the theory? Obviously a caveat to that is assuming that our opponent is a thinking player.
Thewy is now on the FT of a 100k GTD event at DTD. 26k for the win.
So I think they are different from normal Sats.
But I tell you what, If I win more than one All in.
If Sky let me, I'll buy your action in the SPT
I think your odds are 2500/1 but i'll keep my word if it happens
Great show as usual.
For tonight's topic...All I want for Christmas... is to get off this Primo table; SoLack, DivsDreams, Style2737 and the 2nd place in chips...easy table...not
AA
Bounty's
Cowboys
Dominating cards
Everybody folding
Free entry into a tourny
Get there on the river
Hit on the flop
Idonkcallu at my table
Joker
Kickers playing
Ladies
Monster hand
Nuts
Overpairs
Position
Quads
Rakeback
Set
Tikays words of wisdom
Unlimited Poker
Value
White Meat
Xtra Chips (sorry slacking here)
Yoyo as my tutor
ZZZZZZZZZ
am i asking for to much?
hi james, ryan
jackpot update...