"Independent journalist"? She is nothing of the sort. The only people describing her as "independent" are herself, and Russia.
The style of writing gives the game away. Words like "slaughtered"-when, in reality, these are misplaced shells. The "Donetsk People's Republic" is a Russian invention. It is no different than if Russia invaded the UK, captured Kent, and called it the "Kentish People Republic".
This "independent" journalist collaborates only with Russia and Russian journalists, and has a long history of writing pieces purely from Russia's point of view.
I'm not saying that are not Western journalists who do not write equally biased pieces. There are.
But the fact remains that Russia has (yet again) invaded someone else's country on the thinnest of pretexts. Causing massive bloodshed. Is Ukraine perfect? Of course not. But, in the vast majority of cases a Country should be left to run itself. On the very rare occasions that should be set to 1 side, that should be done by an International Force.
Eva Karene Bartlett is an American Canadian activist, commentator, and blogger who has propagated conspiracy theories in connection to the Syrian civil war, most notably the disproven allegation that the White Helmets stage rescues and "recycle" children in its videos.
Bartlett describes herself as an "independent writer and rights activist." She writes commentary pieces for Russian state-controlled RT's website. Critics contend that her advocacy amounts to participation in a disinformation campaign aimed at lessening the responsibility of the Assad regime for the acts of indiscriminate killing during the war, and to promote pro-Kremlin content in relation to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Her posts on social media have been tagged with the disclaimer that her writings "may be partially or wholly under the editorial control of the Russian government."
Bartlett has been making videos and posts on social media from Ukraine during the Russian invasion, often collaborating with journalists from Russian state media. She has been frequently criticised for spreading Kremlin propaganda and misinformation.
And much, much more like that. Interesting use of the term "independent".
"Independent journalist"? She is nothing of the sort. The only people describing her as "independent" are herself, and Russia.
The style of writing gives the game away. Words like "slaughtered"-when, in reality, these are misplaced shells. The "Donetsk People's Republic" is a Russian invention. It is no different than if Russia invaded the UK, captured Kent, and called it the "Kentish People Republic".
This "independent" journalist collaborates only with Russia and Russian journalists, and has a long history of writing pieces purely from Russia's point of view.
I'm not saying that are not Western journalists who do not write equally biased pieces. There are.
But the fact remains that Russia has (yet again) invaded someone else's country on the thinnest of pretexts. Causing massive bloodshed. Is Ukraine perfect? Of course not. But, in the vast majority of cases a Country should be left to run itself. On the very rare occasions that should be set to 1 side, that should be done by an International Force.
"Independent journalist"? She is nothing of the sort. The only people describing her as "independent" are herself, and Russia.
The style of writing gives the game away. Words like "slaughtered"-when, in reality, these are misplaced shells. The "Donetsk People's Republic" is a Russian invention. It is no different than if Russia invaded the UK, captured Kent, and called it the "Kentish People Republic".
This "independent" journalist collaborates only with Russia and Russian journalists, and has a long history of writing pieces purely from Russia's point of view.
I'm not saying that are not Western journalists who do not write equally biased pieces. There are.
But the fact remains that Russia has (yet again) invaded someone else's country on the thinnest of pretexts. Causing massive bloodshed. Is Ukraine perfect? Of course not. But, in the vast majority of cases a Country should be left to run itself. On the very rare occasions that should be set to 1 side, that should be done by an International Force.
Not Russia. Or, for that matter, the USA.
Misplaced shells lol
Of course they are. Doesn't make the victims any less dead.
And your "independent" journalist casually mentioned that there had been "previously...fatal attacks" at that self-same market. And "forgot" to mention that those attacks were by the Russians invading a Region of another Country, Ukraine. Killing civilians with their own misplaced shells.
Comments
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/183cmHs1NCzL61ghjRvgMJ/five-things-we-learned-about-russians-in-the-uk#:~:text=Hundreds of thousands of Russians are thought to,tours taking journalists round what's known as "Londongrad".
Split in to 2 groups. Putin's multi-millionaire favourites, and dissidents.
I'm sure you don't frequent Legions. Go into mine talking like you do, and you would get your head kicked in.
By patriots.
Probably
Ukranian farmers will make use of them.
Where as in reality, Putin is a tiny man, these chairs are too big for him.
How many uk based Russians has the British state killed in the last 8 years?
Keep praying.
The style of writing gives the game away. Words like "slaughtered"-when, in reality, these are misplaced shells. The "Donetsk People's Republic" is a Russian invention. It is no different than if Russia invaded the UK, captured Kent, and called it the "Kentish People Republic".
This "independent" journalist collaborates only with Russia and Russian journalists, and has a long history of writing pieces purely from Russia's point of view.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Bartlett
I'm not saying that are not Western journalists who do not write equally biased pieces. There are.
But the fact remains that Russia has (yet again) invaded someone else's country on the thinnest of pretexts. Causing massive bloodshed. Is Ukraine perfect? Of course not. But, in the vast majority of cases a Country should be left to run itself. On the very rare occasions that should be set to 1 side, that should be done by an International Force.
Not Russia. Or, for that matter, the USA.
Eva Karene Bartlett is an American Canadian activist, commentator, and blogger who has propagated conspiracy theories in connection to the Syrian civil war, most notably the disproven allegation that the White Helmets stage rescues and "recycle" children in its videos.
Bartlett describes herself as an "independent writer and rights activist." She writes commentary pieces for Russian state-controlled RT's website. Critics contend that her advocacy amounts to participation in a disinformation campaign aimed at lessening the responsibility of the Assad regime for the acts of indiscriminate killing during the war, and to promote pro-Kremlin content in relation to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Her posts on social media have been tagged with the disclaimer that her writings "may be partially or wholly under the editorial control of the Russian government."
Bartlett has been making videos and posts on social media from Ukraine during the Russian invasion, often collaborating with journalists from Russian state media. She has been frequently criticised for spreading Kremlin propaganda and misinformation.
And much, much more like that. Interesting use of the term "independent".
lol
And your "independent" journalist casually mentioned that there had been "previously...fatal attacks" at that self-same market. And "forgot" to mention that those attacks were by the Russians invading a Region of another Country, Ukraine. Killing civilians with their own misplaced shells.
Nothing "lol" about it.