You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

Options

is poker a game of skill ?

TheMadMonkTheMadMonk Member Posts: 291
had this discussion the other night with a few poker mates,

in my opinion,the answer is no,poker is not a game of skill its just a form of gambling

I would go as far as to say there is more skill involved in being a successful horseracing punter or sports better than there is in poker.

if you look at other forms of gambling,like horseracing say,we have the different types of punter,the ones who only bet odds on favs [in poker that's the ones who only play premium hands] or the punters who like to bet the outsiders 33/1 shot etc [in poker,the ones who like to get it in with any two] then theres the pros, winning punters/players ,the difference between them and the ordinary punter/players is they put a lot of work/study in on the subject,they also make less mistakes with their bets,and they know when to walk away.

in poker like in other forms of gambling, sometimes the favs betting players will win,sometimes the outsider betting players will win,longterm it will be the players who study the form and make less betting mistakes who will come out on top.which I suppose could be classed as a skill,but no matter what kind of player you are,its just a gamble imo,

whats your take on it?

«1

Comments

  • Options
    Jac35Jac35 Member Posts: 6,485
    edited December 2017
    Totally disagree
    But I’m happy that in the UK poker is classed as a game of chance.

    Edit
    Stupid phone
  • Options
    TheMadMonkTheMadMonk Member Posts: 291
    in the uk poker is classed as a game of chance,after the gutshots defeat in the high court,which imo was one of the best things to happen in poker,otherwise we would be paying tax on winnings
  • Options
    Angmar2626Angmar2626 Member Posts: 886
    I'm a professional musician for a living, and getting to an accomplished standard on a musical instrument requires thousands and thousands of hours of practice and work. Also there's no end-point: you don't suddenly arrive at a level of ability where you can't physically improve in some aspect. However good you are there's always something you can improve and work on.

    Alright, in poker there's luck, chance, variance, etc, but I honestly think it's similar to learning a musical instrument in some aspects. There are just so many layers to the strategy and theory and however deep you go, there's always more. Fascinating stuff!
  • Options
    Angmar2626Angmar2626 Member Posts: 886
    Paging @HENDRIK62 for a golf analogy to back me up
  • Options
    Jac35Jac35 Member Posts: 6,485

    Paging @HENDRIK62 for a golf analogy to back me up

    He’s busy on the range destroying a 10 handicappers swing.
    I’ll step in for him

    Gary Player
    “The more I practice, the luckier I get,”
  • Options
    Angmar2626Angmar2626 Member Posts: 886
    Jac35 said:

    Paging @HENDRIK62 for a golf analogy to back me up

    He’s busy on the range destroying a 10 handicappers swing.
    I’ll step in for him

    Gary Player
    “The more I practice, the luckier I get,”
    Yeah, this
  • Options
    HENDRIK62HENDRIK62 Member Posts: 3,168
    Ah this is a huge subject, I may go all @markycash on you.

    Masses of luck involed in so many areas of life, whether it be that dream job becoming available at exactly the right time for you, meeting the right person at exactly the right time etc etc

    However, having the skill set or the learned knowledge to grasp those opportunities is NOT luck, it is hard work and practice.

    I remember the leaders being blown off the golf course in The Open at Muirfield on a crazy Saturday afternoon in 2002, Ernie Els was really not in contention yet went on to win it, he had a skill set built up over years which allowed him to take advantage of that slice of luck.

    How many times do we see or hear people whining about how certain players run better than others in MTTs?

    Yet no-one mentions the fact that these players are taking huge numbers of beats and indeed busting many, many times.

    They keep putting themselves in position and building their stack to allow for the inevitable suck outs, that is the skill of these players, its taking that marginal spot to gain EV, its folding when its -EV, applying pressure at the correct time.
    Knowing ICM, SPR, learning to read board textures and how they affect yours and others decisions is NOT luck its a learned skill.

    Talking about marky, if you read his blog (I know, I know, most don't have the time :wink: ) you will have seen the effort he put in and sheer hard work involved in putting yourself in front of the right people time and time again to 'get lucky'.

    I can only imagine how hard being a musician is, I would imagine many decisions being subjective and perhaps style driven, luck must also play a huge role.

    Whatever resonates with client or producer, but that doesn't change the fact that the person who has worked hardest to develop a unique style or become an expert in a specific method will have a better chance of getting the gig (nb musical style language- down with the kids me)

    In closing Poker involves a lot of luck, but the skilled player will always end up +EV in the long term.
  • Options
    adzboadzbo Member Posts: 52
    I agree with most of the above comments with this. IMO poker is a game of skill that has elements of luck/chance involved with it. Whilst it is obvz still a form of gambling, the big difference for me with the horseracing/sports betting and poker analogy is that with the horseracing/sports betting, whilst studying form etc is a skill, you don't any direct effect on the outcome of the games, whereas with poker you do. Bad/good luck can/will still influence the games but, as Hendrik says above, in the long run, more skilled players will generally be +EV.
  • Options
    hhyftrftdrhhyftrftdr Member Posts: 8,036
    ''in poker like in other forms of gambling, sometimes the favs betting players will win,sometimes the outsider betting players will win,longterm it will be the players who study the form and make less betting mistakes who will come out on top.which I suppose could be classed as a skill''

    That answers your own question.
  • Options
    scotty77scotty77 Member Posts: 4,970
    I would agree that there is probably more skill needed to be a winning sports bettor than a winning poker player. In sports betting you are against the entire industry, who all run simulations and have teams of experienced traders. And if one firm gets a price wrong, it is very quickly picked up on. Reading up on some of the stories of the early days of online sports betting remind me a lot of the early days of online poker. No one really knew what they were doing, right time, right place and all of the firms themselves were going thru a massive learning curve along with the punters/players.

    In poker you are playing (well the majority of the time) against fellow humans, who can all be flawed and make mistakes.

    Both require a lot of dedication and effort, especially now when games are tougher than ever - but there is an endless amount of coaching and training content out there so anyone who wants to get good has never had it so easy.

    To be a winner at sports or poker means that you have to be somewhat of an outsider to the general player pool. To be a crusher at either you have to be a genuine outlier, such as Tony Bloom or Fedor Holz.


  • Options
    HENDRIK62HENDRIK62 Member Posts: 3,168

    ''in poker like in other forms of gambling, sometimes the favs betting players will win,sometimes the outsider betting players will win,longterm it will be the players who study the form and make less betting mistakes who will come out on top.which I suppose could be classed as a skill''

    That answers your own question.


    don't come on here with your concise, to the point observations, when you could write paragraph after paragraph, bit like giving someone a kebab without actually putting it together.....must be a Yorkshire thing :wink:
  • Options
    FeelGroggyFeelGroggy Member Posts: 828
    I think a lot of people who insist poker is a game of luck either don't know enough about it and see it as akin to roulette, or are simply not good at it. It's much easier to attribute lack of success to being unlucky rather than lacking skill.
  • Options
    craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,960
    edited December 2017
    People who don't study or have never actually played poker will always view the game as luck because the game itself is a card game and is played in a casino which is a place of gambling but poker is certainly a game of skill.

    When doing roulette, playing slot machines or blackjack your required to spend money in order to play but in poker 4/6 or 8/10 of the hands are seen for free and you can get an idea of where your hand stands post flop before putting money in therefore with skills you'll learn over time what hands should and shouldn't be played pre and how good your hand will be before choosing to call each street.

    Another reason people consider poker gambling is they view skill and luck as opposites, if a game has luck it doesn't have skill therefore poker is viewed as a game of luck. I read a web page once all about skill and luck, it described how skill and luck work and how it varies game by game and mark down in a graph where it would stand. Tic tac toe for instance was described as a game which needed no luck or skill to play, roulette is a game which needs no skill has lots of luck, Chess is a game which would require huge skill but no luck and then you have poker which is a game that requires lots of skill and lots of luck.

    Poker does have it's times when the player expected to win a hand doesn't win and tournaments have been won by a recreational player but this happens in many forms of life. Leicester city winning the PL was a major shocker, Iceland knocked england out of euro 2016, Japan beat south africa in rugby world cup, trump is presidient........ This list goes on and on. Whats clear is those who do best are their thanks to skill.
  • Options
    HENDRIK62HENDRIK62 Member Posts: 3,168
    craigcu12 said:

    People who don't study or have never actually played poker will always view the game as luck because the game itself is a card game and is played in a casino which is a place of gambling but poker is certainly a game of skill.

    When doing roulette, playing slot machines or blackjack your required to spend money in order to play but in poker 4/6 or 8/10 of the hands are seen for free and you can get an idea of where your hand stands post flop before putting money in therefore with skills you'll learn over time what hands should and shouldn't be played pre and how good your hand will be before choosing to call each street.

    Another reason people consider poker gambling is they view skill and luck as opposites, if a game has luck it doesn't have skill therefore poker is viewed as a game of luck. I read a web page once all about skill and luck, it described how skill and luck work and how it varies game by game and mark down in a graph where it would stand. Tic tac toe for instance was described as a game which needed no luck or skill to play, roulette is a game which needs no skill has lots of luck, Chess is a game which would require huge skill but no luck and then you have poker which is a game that requires lots of skill and lots of luck.

    Poker does have it's times when the player expected to win a hand doesn't win and tournaments have been won by a recreational player but this happens in many forms of life. Leicester city winning the PL was a major shocker, Iceland knocked england out of euro 2016, Japan beat south africa in rugby world cup, trump is presidient........ This list goes on and on. Whats clear is those who do best are their thanks to skill.

    I assume this is a red herring?
  • Options
    markycashmarkycash Member Posts: 2,837
    Try flipping a coin (which is almost pot luck) and getting a profit graph resembling the one linked by Sky James.

    Let me know when you manage it.

    Good luck (pun intended).

  • Options
    safc71safc71 Member Posts: 1,542
    It's got to be skill . To have any chance against the top earners on sky poker who always make profit i would have to read more, watch more poker videos etc etc. to try and up my skill level. It's not gambling to players who are guaranteed to make money every year the less skill you have the more it is a gamble.
  • Options
    Jac35Jac35 Member Posts: 6,485
    stokefc said:

    its definatly skillz i,ve just won the orfy with skillz that and and jack daniels close the thread :D

    Boss :)
  • Options
    craigcu12craigcu12 Member Posts: 3,960
    HENDRIK62 said:

    craigcu12 said:

    People who don't study or have never actually played poker will always view the game as luck because the game itself is a card game and is played in a casino which is a place of gambling but poker is certainly a game of skill.

    When doing roulette, playing slot machines or blackjack your required to spend money in order to play but in poker 4/6 or 8/10 of the hands are seen for free and you can get an idea of where your hand stands post flop before putting money in therefore with skills you'll learn over time what hands should and shouldn't be played pre and how good your hand will be before choosing to call each street.

    Another reason people consider poker gambling is they view skill and luck as opposites, if a game has luck it doesn't have skill therefore poker is viewed as a game of luck. I read a web page once all about skill and luck, it described how skill and luck work and how it varies game by game and mark down in a graph where it would stand. Tic tac toe for instance was described as a game which needed no luck or skill to play, roulette is a game which needs no skill has lots of luck, Chess is a game which would require huge skill but no luck and then you have poker which is a game that requires lots of skill and lots of luck.

    Poker does have it's times when the player expected to win a hand doesn't win and tournaments have been won by a recreational player but this happens in many forms of life. Leicester city winning the PL was a major shocker, Iceland knocked england out of euro 2016, Japan beat south africa in rugby world cup, trump is presidient........ This list goes on and on. Whats clear is those who do best are their thanks to skill.

    I assume this is a red herring?
    I do suppose every england win is a piece of good luck
Sign In or Register to comment.