i had a look at another set of weightings the skew the results towards the top end. the outcome is pretty much the same. tommy overtakes solack. the three; divs, tommy and solack are still very close on points. p2q is higher.
i am content with this as a good illustration of overall performance.
The only thing I can deduce from these tables is that Mattbates has failed to cash in 1,401 tournies. That figure is more than any one else has even played....therefore he must be the nut worst player on this site!
The only thing I can deduce from these tables is that Mattbates has failed to cash in 1,401 tournies. That figure is more than any one else has even played....therefore he must be the nut worst player on this site! .....ish Posted by MAXALLY
I’m not trying to be the fly in the ointment here, but is it only me who feels a little uneasy that the profits of players are being posted in this thread? I appreciate that this information is easily accessible through certain channels, and I have nothing against Aussie's work here, but I still think it’s unnecessary to have it collated for all to see. Perhaps the players being discussed wouldn’t feel overly comfortable either. I don’t know. It’s part of the reason I was against using monetary values when the points system for the Main/Mini Leaderboard was discussed twelve months ago.
If I’m on my own, fair enough – in which case, as you were.
I’m not trying to be the fly in the ointment here, but.... Posted by Slipwater
you know slippy that all mtt figures are available to everyone who wishes to see them. there's nothing secret, nor is there any reason to be secretive either.
some people look at s/scope to get a full picture. some people look at your tables to get a focussed picture. i look at my tables to get a focussed picture too.
The only thing I can deduce from these tables is that Mattbates has failed to cash in 1,401 tournies. That figure is more than any one else has even played....therefore he must be the nut worst player on this site! .....ish Posted by MAXALLY
Phew, thought you was going to mention that I have the most bubbles!
Must admit it is slightly interesting that the OP is ok with posting other people's profit an losses yet has his own stats blocked. Still, you must have gone to some effort to make these tables an they offer some good stats
Must admit it is slightly interesting that the OP is ok with posting other people's profit an losses yet has his own stats blocked. Still, you must have gone to some effort to make these tables an they offer some good stats Posted by nickd49931
might want to check buyin figures CMoorman paid £530 for the HR and the other 3 were £110s iirc 7 CMoorman 4 550.00 14,398.32 13,848.32 Posted by GELDY
cheers geldy. i had forgotten about that "super-high" buy-in level and noted that game as £220 will correct my records. thank you.
Great stats Aussie. Just from those ten players they paid Sky approximately £34K in rake.
You said in one of the first post approx 37,000 players had played, do you have a spreadsheet with 37,000 different lines on? Looks like you put quite a few hours into this, very interesting though. Would be good if you could put a link to the spreadsheet or whatever you use on a external website or something, not sure if that is possible. Then even the also-rans could see how they shape up without putting the whole lot on a forum post.
Great stats Aussie. Just from those ten players they paid Sky approximately £34K in rake. You said in one of the first post approx 37,000 players had played, do you have a spreadsheet with 37,000 different lines on? Looks like you put quite a few hours into this, very interesting though. Would be good if you could put a link to the spreadsheet or whatever you use on a external website or something, not sure if that is possible. Then even the also-rans could see how they shape up without putting the whole lot on a forum post. Posted by GREGSTER
thanks greg.
37,000 players so far in 2014. i am running something at the moment as i am interested in seeing who are the top 10 players over the last 5 years.
In Response to Re: * * * £1,000+ guarantee leagues * * * : thanks greg. 37,000 players so far in 2014. i am running something at the moment as i am interested in seeing who are the top 10 players over the last 5 years. Posted by aussie09
Just outta curiosity...Nothing vain mind, Am i in the top 36,000?
Theres gotta be "Glenelg" somewhere on the spreadsheet surely? ;-)
In Response to Re: * * * £1,000+ guarantee leagues * * * : Just outta curiosity...Nothing vain mind, Am i in the top 36,000? Theres gotta be "Glenelg" somewhere on the spreadsheet surely? ;-) Loving ya work. Why did you give up doing the jackpot thread? Musta been a doddle compared to this? pad Posted by Glenelg
hi pad,
as you asked i had a look at your figures and yes you are in the top 36,000. last night, i created tables for the last five years, there are 93,914 players. you are in the top 36,000 of those too. your figures are good but i have not gone into any great detail.
incidentally, you are 1,835th out of 94,000 players in the bubble league.
thanks for you comments too.
rob
ps. i stopped posting jackpot updates because of being flamed too often. as i did it for fun, so we can all see who has a chance, when the fun part disappeared i stopped. i have posted a few jackpot updates to richard's and anna's show threads recently.
In Response to Re: * * * £1,000+ guarantee leagues * * * : hi pad, as you asked i had a look at your figures and yes you are in the top 36,000. last night, i created tables for the last five years, there are 93,914 players. you are in the top 36,000 of those too. your figures are good but i have not gone into any great detail. incidentally, you are 1,835th out of 94,000 players in the bubble league. thanks for you comments too. rob ps. i stopped posting jackpot updates because of being flamed too often. as i did it for fun, so we can all see who has a chance, when the fun part disappeared i stopped. i have posted a few jackpot updates to richard's and anna's show threads recently. Posted by aussie09
Ha, brilliant, damned with faint praise as the saying goes.
Flaming? It's really quite a comment on internet society these days. I'll wager that those that flamed you do nothing to contribute positively to the Community, but enjoy knocking those that do.
My time on the internet is nearly run, & in some ways, I can't say I'm sorry about that.
In Response to Re: * * * £1,000+ guarantee leagues * * * : Ha, brilliant, damned with faint praise as the saying goes. Flaming? It's really quite a comment on internet society these days. I'll wager that those that flamed you do nothing to contribute positively to the Community, but enjoy knocking those that do. My time on the internet is nearly run, & in some ways, I can't say I'm sorry about that. Posted by Tikay10
hi tikay,
you had better carry on for a lot longer on the internet, i have just voted for you.
And, you defo can't accept an award for blogging if you have held your internet connection in your hands and gone ahead with the snip.
Comments
i had a look at another set of weightings the skew the results towards the top end. the outcome is pretty much the same. tommy overtakes solack. the three; divs, tommy and solack are still very close on points. p2q is higher.
i am content with this as a good illustration of overall performance.
I’m not trying to be the fly in the ointment here, but is it only me who feels a little uneasy that the profits of players are being posted in this thread? I appreciate that this information is easily accessible through certain channels, and I have nothing against Aussie's work here, but I still think it’s unnecessary to have it collated for all to see. Perhaps the players being discussed wouldn’t feel overly comfortable either. I don’t know. It’s part of the reason I was against using monetary values when the points system for the Main/Mini Leaderboard was discussed twelve months ago.
If I’m on my own, fair enough – in which case, as you were.
some people look at s/scope to get a full picture. some people look at your tables to get a focussed picture. i look at my tables to get a focussed picture too.
thanks nick
thanks man... mc&hny to you
cheers geldy. i had forgotten about that "super-high" buy-in level and noted that game as £220 will correct my records. thank you.
You said in one of the first post approx 37,000 players had played, do you have a spreadsheet with 37,000 different lines on? Looks like you put quite a few hours into this, very interesting though. Would be good if you could put a link to the spreadsheet or whatever you use on a external website or something, not sure if that is possible. Then even the also-rans could see how they shape up without putting the whole lot on a forum post.
thanks greg.
37,000 players so far in 2014. i am running something at the moment as i am interested in seeing who are the top 10 players over the last 5 years.
Just outta curiosity...Nothing vain mind, Am i in the top 36,000?
as you asked i had a look at your figures and yes you are in the top 36,000. last night, i created tables for the last five years, there are 93,914 players. you are in the top 36,000 of those too. your figures are good but i have not gone into any great detail.
incidentally, you are 1,835th out of 94,000 players in the bubble league.
thanks for you comments too.
rob
ps. i stopped posting jackpot updates because of being flamed too often. as i did it for fun, so we can all see who has a chance, when the fun part disappeared i stopped. i have posted a few jackpot updates to richard's and anna's show threads recently.
Flaming? It's really quite a comment on internet society these days. I'll wager that those that flamed you do nothing to contribute positively to the Community, but enjoy knocking those that do.
My time on the internet is nearly run, & in some ways, I can't say I'm sorry about that.
hi tikay,
you had better carry on for a lot longer on the internet, i have just voted for you.
And, you defo can't accept an award for blogging if you have held your internet connection in your hands and gone ahead with the snip.
rob
up to and including last night's £1k+ games, the tables for december 2014 are these.
a total of 8,056 players in 212 games.