Hi, as from today (29/06/17) I will try some practice Placepot perms along with Phantom, Wynne and Vaigret (although I am not sure Wynne needs any practice lol)
P&L VIRTUAL TABLE BELOW:
STAYORGO | PLACEPOT | PROFIT/LOSS | VIRTUAL | SUMMARY |
|
|
|
|
|
DATE | MEETING | VIRTUAL COSTS | VIRTUAL RTNS | VIRTUAL PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
|
29/06/2017 | NEWCASTLE A/W | -£97.20 | £0.00 | -£97.20 |
30/06/2017 | DONCASTER | -£97.20 | £96.75 | -£0.45 |
30/06/2017 | CHESTER | -£97.20 | £35.61 | -£61.59 |
01/07/2017 | NEWCASTLE A/W | -£81.60 | £126.56 | £44.96 |
04/07/2017 | BRIGHTON | -£91.80 | £81.27 | -£10.53 |
05/07/2017 | THIRSK | -£101.70 | £45.36 | -£56.34 |
06/07/2017 | HAYDOCK | -£94.50 | £30.15 | -£64.35 |
TOTALS |
| -£661.20 | £415.70 | -£245.50 |
P&L REAL TABLE BELOW:
STAYORGO | PLACEPOT | PROFIT/LOSS | REAL | SUMMARY |
|
|
|
|
|
DATE | MEETING | REAL COSTS | REAL RTNS | REAL PROFIT |
|
|
|
|
|
29/06/2017 | NEWCASTLE A/W | -£64.80 | £0.00 | -£64.80 |
30/06/2017 | DONCASTER | -£54.00 | £25.80 | -£28.20 |
30/06/2017 | CHESTER | -£64.80 | £23.74 | -£41.06 |
01/07/2017 | NEWCASTLE A/W | -£60.00 | £126.56 | £66.56 |
04/07/2017 | BRIGHTON | -£61.20 | £54.18 | -£7.02 |
05/07/2017 | THIRSK | -£67.80 | £30.24 | -£37.56 |
06/07/2017 | HAYDOCK | -£63.00 | £20.10 | -£42.90 |
TOTALS |
| -£435.60 | £280.62 | -£154.98 |
Most days I won't have time to study any form, so they will be purely statistics based most of the time.
I will keep two running profit and loss totals. One for "Virtual" and one for "Real"
On average I will stake around 100 "virtual pounds" per meeting. On some occasions, I may actually place the bets, if I do this I will keep a separate tally on "real" ones as well as the virtual.
GL to my fellow Placepot comrades. :=)
Cheers,
G
Comments
I looked at the last 5 meetings and the results seem to back this up, and I would even suggest there is a high draw bias in the longer races. Although the shorter the race, the more the bias.
It looks like the high draw (which I think is the stands side) is the place to be be.
I will take this into consideration with my A, B, C selections.
I think if we can combine a perm strategy with a known and reasonably consistent bias, we could benefit.
We'll see anyway.
Just thought I would put that out there.
Cheers,
G
Rather than class races as NON_COMPETITIVE, COMPETITIVE AND VERY COMPETITIVE, I have given them a "COMPETITIVE RATING" between 1 and 10, where 1 would be a real odds on shot and no strength in depth and 10 would be EXTREMELY competitive, like perhaps the LINCOLN, HUNT CUP or GRAND NATIONAL as examples.
Cheers,
G
So this will count as £64.80 in the "real" P&L chart and £97.20 in the "virtual" P&L chart.
Cheers,
G
Big Les my fancy in 2.30
well done at least I got some place money
I didn't have any of the first three in LEG 6 in my selections, so by default, must have bust all.
I will do an equity calculator spreadsheet for your Newbury Placepot, just so you can see what is a good result and what is bad.
Let me know if it's of use. I will explain how to calculate it later if you are interested. You may even be able to set a template up to calculate it with formulas.
Cheers,
G
Running Totals after one Placepot Multi-Perm attempt on 29/06/17:
Virtual Loss: -£97.20
Actual Loss: -£64.80
Chester of course has one of the most well known and consistent draw biases in the county, with nearly all distances favouring low drawn runners.
Cheers,
G
Not sure if it will be the Jackpot meeting or not. If it is, I may use peoples NAP selections.
Cheers,
G
We shall see. :=)
FYI, Jackpot is 29% and SCOOP6 30%.
Cheers,
G
So real stakes = £54.00 (540 * 10p lines), virtual stakes = £97.20
GL all!