You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

400 QUID

13»

Comments

  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,092
    edited June 2019
    Thread temporarily closed whilst I sort a few things out.


    Thread now re-opened.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,092

    OP has received a 7 day Ban for persistent abuse, & been warned that further abuse will result in a 3 month ban, followed by a permanent ban if necessary.

    It's your Forum guys, & we all need to behave responsibly if we want to keep the Forum, &, perhaps, persuade our new owners that it's worth keeping.

    Several senior Forum Members have written to me suggesting the fella was going too far, & then, today, the Suits suggested to me it was all a bit much, so that's that.

    Personally, I thought most regular Forum users had the fella sussed & just thought it was funny, & I'm of that view too, but we have to draw a line somewhere.

    In a way, it's a bit like the Referee stepping in during a one sided boxing match, where one of the boxers is getting a right pasting. Sometimes you have to step in for their own good, to save them further punishment. He was certainly getting beat up, & deservedly so, but it's a little unpleasant to see someone being so totally owned.

    I expect the Usual Suspects will say we are Ban-Happy, & it's all so unfair. It's never good to ban folks, but sometimes it has to be done. So that's the third person (& 4th Account) banned this year.

    Let's hope there are no more.
  • lucy4lucy4 Member Posts: 8,208
    Tikay10 said:


    OP has received a 7 day Ban for persistent abuse, & been warned that further abuse will result in a 3 month ban, followed by a permanent ban if necessary.

    It's your Forum guys, & we all need to behave responsibly if we want to keep the Forum, &, perhaps, persuade our new owners that it's worth keeping.

    Several senior Forum Members have written to me suggesting the fella was going too far, & then, today, the Suits suggested to me it was all a bit much, so that's that.

    Personally, I thought most regular Forum users had the fella sussed & just thought it was funny, & I'm of that view too, but we have to draw a line somewhere.

    In a way, it's a bit like the Referee stepping in during a one sided boxing match, where one of the boxers is getting a right pasting. Sometimes you have to step in for their own good, to save them further punishment. He was certainly getting beat up, & deservedly so, but it's a little unpleasant to see someone being so totally owned.

    I expect the Usual Suspects will say we are Ban-Happy, & it's all so unfair. It's never good to ban folks, but sometimes it has to be done. So that's the third person (& 4th Account) banned this year.

    Let's hope there are no more.

    That's all very well but where's the "100 fcknquid "..?
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,092

    @lucy4

    Disappeared, out of the blue, apparently. Except it didn't.

  • GlenelgGlenelg Member Posts: 6,614
    om mani padme hum
  • TheEdge949TheEdge949 Member Posts: 5,741
    Seriously guys I was never trying to get Mr Zen banned. I was merely engaging in a battle of wit and banter which admittedly i felt might provide the occassional moment of hilarity.

    Mr Zen don't know if you can still read posts but if you can just let me say nothing was personal and i will be the first to welcome you back to the forum.

    be happy
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,092

    Seriously guys I was never trying to get Mr Zen banned. I was merely engaging in a battle of wit and banter which admittedly i felt might provide the occassional moment of hilarity.

    Mr Zen don't know if you can still read posts but if you can just let me say nothing was personal and i will be the first to welcome you back to the forum.

    be happy


    There was never any suggestion of that Mark. He was just pushing it too far.

    Hopefully when he returns he'll be a little more reasoned & sensible.
  • stokefcstokefc Member Posts: 7,877
    edited June 2019
    waller02 said:

    WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN ? GET THEFCK OFF MY THREAD FATHEAD

    I'm starting to think that you might not actually be a Zen Buddhist......can't quite put my finger on it but I've definitely got my doubts.
    Tikay10 said:

    Seriously guys I was never trying to get Mr Zen banned. I was merely engaging in a battle of wit and banter which admittedly i felt might provide the occassional moment of hilarity.

    Mr Zen don't know if you can still read posts but if you can just let me say nothing was personal and i will be the first to welcome you back to the forum.

    be happy


    There was never any suggestion of that Mark. He was just pushing it too far.

    Hopefully when he returns he'll be a little more reasoned & sensible.
    I doubt it.
  • Tikay10Tikay10 Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 172,092

    Welcome back @zenbudhist

    How about we keep it cool this time?

    Have some bants by all means, but less of the gratuitous insults & profanities.
  • DuesenbergDuesenberg Member Posts: 1,746
  • zenbudhistzenbudhist Member Posts: 144
    do I look like a Michael Jackson fan?
Sign In or Register to comment.