respect, every poster here, bar, the MasterClasss Merchant... ( not so, vociferous,with your theory,when,some of 'Da Biggy' boy'z n gal'z , dont agree....
@misterpj -9Ts hand you would expect to win only a little more than 50% of the time. -TT & JJ hands you would expect to win a little less than 3 out of 4 times each. -Even the 88 hand you're going to lose more than 1 in 5 times.
You don't post the other times when you hold or get there. These hands aren't bad beats and wouldn't even be noteworthy to the average player.
respect, every poster here, bar, the MasterClasss Merchant... ( not so, vociferous,with your theory,when,some of 'Da Biggy' boy'z n gal'z , dont agree....
I think it's great when "da biggy boyz," by which I assume you mean good players, disagree with me. That means I have an opportunity to learn something and become a better poker player. I know that may be difficult to understand for someone who routinely ignores the learning opportunities presented to them while retaining a comical insistence that they are a great player. When you blame every loss on variance you don't learn a thing, as you so kindly demonstrate on a regular basis.
This was an interesting and informative discussion until you showed up with the circus. None of these hands are remarkable and there is almost nothing worth discussing about them. None but one were big favourites and you should expect to lose frequently with them. I have seen you benefit from the other side of this with criminally bad hands countless times. You have no business complaining about variance.
I couldn't care less if I have your respect, I don't need the respect of terrible players.
Comments
Oh..and Queens English...) masterclass( demands..,so , forgive !
here are a few, very recent, ...erm...'swinging down' badding run' Variance Beasty..ezz.
1456169839 (exit)
bounty hunter
'tough, at the top..Eh Nost'i' XXX
'of Dat' run ba babba BAD... going on,
had 2 years of it, so, ' must ! change soon' ..Eh Nosti
good job, I know, it is..VARIANCE xXX
-9Ts hand you would expect to win only a little more than 50% of the time.
-TT & JJ hands you would expect to win a little less than 3 out of 4 times each.
-Even the 88 hand you're going to lose more than 1 in 5 times.
You don't post the other times when you hold or get there. These hands aren't bad beats and wouldn't even be noteworthy to the average player.
This was an interesting and informative discussion until you showed up with the circus. None of these hands are remarkable and there is almost nothing worth discussing about them. None but one were big favourites and you should expect to lose frequently with them. I have seen you benefit from the other side of this with criminally bad hands countless times. You have no business complaining about variance.
I couldn't care less if I have your respect, I don't need the respect of terrible players.