Not much help Was going to ask one on a date but not sure which.
Good original post. Maybe @Essexphil can break it all down and lay it all out in easy to understand jargon. Maybe that’s why an ID card is required,to list a persons preferences.To be carried by all. Some lists are likely to be longer than others. Maybe when one is s hit faced when out and about,and can’t focus on any print,that could cause problems? That includes both parties or however many fancy joining in.
I could be wrong,but it looks like one likes a di ck that isn’t attached to a potentially higher testosterone source?
Here goes. Especially for the hard of thinking.
Other people's sexuality is their business. Not something to make fun of. Unless you are 12 years old.
It's not "jargon". It is people's life choices. Not things to belittle. Live and let live.
Who is making fun of anybody? I thought I’d gone into detail,with what could happen in real life situations. The definition of a **** does not cover those two. They must be lesbians +. +. +. It appears both just like to s hag a lot with whoever. The fact that they need to explain/ express themselves, must mean they are aware that they need to get a message out.
@chilling This thread is In difficult times...humour helps
If you want to troll , there are other humorless threads available.
You don’t have to comment on this thread, your choice. My choice is to comment. Ruffles some regs, but who gives a stuff. If you can’t handle folks with different views, then that’s your problem, not mine.
@chilling This thread is In difficult times...humour helps
If you want to troll , there are other humorless threads available.
You don’t have to comment on this thread, your choice. My choice is to comment. Ruffles some regs, but who gives a stuff. If you can’t handle folks with different views, then that’s your problem, not mine.
@chilling This thread is In difficult times...humour helps
If you want to troll , there are other humorless threads available.
You don’t have to comment on this thread, your choice. My choice is to comment. Ruffles some regs, but who gives a stuff. If you can’t handle folks with different views, then that’s your problem, not mine.
The thing is chilly , you chose to comment on a humorous thread posting not so humorous rubbish and basically derail the thread , want to ruffle a few feathers , sounds like trolling to me You can start your own threads if you want to air your views/opinions rather than trolling other treads .nah you'd rather spoil it for everybody else cuz that's what you're like
@mumsie and @stokefc youve made no comment on the original post. That makes you trolls I believe.
I found the original post amusing, as others would, but would be fearful of the likes of yous three coming out bullying any comment you don’t agree with. Your bullying is under the guise of trying to moderate,seen it all before. Hence the ‘ bigot’ remark from the lawyer.
I’d have thought a lawyer would need to know exactly what those two are labelled as, regarding sexual orientation, as that would apply to anything involving the equality act in certain court cases.
Although the same fella has been discussing vaccination allocation and production for weeks, even though it’s quite clearly been orchestrated/ scripted. Funny how it’s in the news then out in an instant. It’s called collaboration,you were told.
@mumsie and @stokefc youve made no comment on the original post. That makes you trolls I believe.
I found the original post amusing, as others would, but would be fearful of the likes of yous three coming out bullying any comment you don’t agree with. Your bullying is under the guise of trying to moderate,seen it all before. Hence the ‘ bigot’ remark from the lawyer.
I’d have thought a lawyer would need to know exactly what those two are labelled as, regarding sexual orientation, as that would apply to anything involving the equality act in certain court cases.
Although the same fella has been discussing vaccination allocation and production for weeks, even though it’s quite clearly been orchestrated/ scripted. Funny how it’s in the news then out in an instant. It’s called collaboration,you were told.
Maybe it’s time the lawyer retired.
This is a thread for humour.
I appreciate you are in training to be a wit. You're halfway there already...
VespaPX asks a straight forward enough question, hence the question mark. Then gets called names/insulted, as per usual, and by the hypocrite, straight off the blocks. Who then goes on to belittle folks as he thinks he has far more knowledge on this particular subject. Classy fella. Bully.
@chilling This thread is In difficult times...humour helps
If you want to troll , there are other humorless threads available.
You don’t have to comment on this thread, your choice. My choice is to comment. Ruffles some regs, but who gives a stuff. If you can’t handle folks with different views, then that’s your problem, not mine.
@chilling This thread is In difficult times...humour helps
If you want to troll , there are other humorless threads available.
You don’t have to comment on this thread, your choice. My choice is to comment. Ruffles some regs, but who gives a stuff. If you can’t handle folks with different views, then that’s your problem, not mine.
The thing is chilly , you chose to comment on a humorous thread posting not so humorous rubbish and basically derail the thread , want to ruffle a few feathers , sounds like trolling to me You can start your own threads if you want to air your views/opinions rather than trolling other treads .nah you'd rather spoil it for everybody else cuz that's what you're like
I think you’ll Mr Phil derailed the thread, check it out. Ruffling a few feathers means having an opposing view to a reg, which then leads to the impulsive reactions of a few.Standard.
Still, I will make allowances for anybody with injectable substances whizzing around there brain.
Comments
I thought I’d gone into detail,with what could happen in real life situations.
The definition of a **** does not cover those two.
They must be lesbians +. +. +.
It appears both just like to s hag a lot with whoever.
The fact that they need to explain/ express themselves, must mean they are aware that they need to get a message out.
12 and three quarters btw.
This thread is In difficult times...humour helps
If you want to troll , there are other humorless threads available.
Meat and 2 vag
So person B sexuality is?
My choice is to comment.
Ruffles some regs, but who gives a stuff.
If you can’t handle folks with different views, then that’s your problem, not mine.
You can start your own threads if you want to air your views/opinions rather than trolling other treads .nah you'd rather spoil it for everybody else cuz that's what you're like
That makes you trolls I believe.
I found the original post amusing, as others would, but would be fearful of the likes of yous three coming out bullying any comment you don’t agree with.
Your bullying is under the guise of trying to moderate,seen it all before.
Hence the ‘ bigot’ remark from the lawyer.
I’d have thought a lawyer would need to know exactly what those two are labelled as, regarding sexual orientation, as that would apply to anything involving the equality act in certain court cases.
Although the same fella has been discussing vaccination allocation and production for weeks, even though it’s quite clearly been orchestrated/ scripted. Funny how it’s in the news then out in an instant.
It’s called collaboration,you were told.
Maybe it’s time the lawyer retired.
I appreciate you are in training to be a wit. You're halfway there already...
Coincidental date 🤨
Then gets called names/insulted, as per usual, and by the hypocrite, straight off the blocks.
Who then goes on to belittle folks as he thinks he has far more knowledge on this particular subject.
Classy fella.
Bully.
Ruffling a few feathers means having an opposing view to a reg, which then leads to the impulsive reactions of a few.Standard.
Still, I will make allowances for anybody with injectable substances whizzing around there brain.
Not that you would know.