"I would imagjne that with 78% of the Australian public fully vaccinated that’s about what they’d expect"
Only 5.3m have had 3 doses, which you regard as fully jabbed.
Australia, like everywhere else, prioritises vaccination according to risk. As do people. So-if 78% of Australians have had 2 vaccines, that percentage will increase with age. So-less than 78% for under-40s (0 deaths) and massively more for over-70s (33 deaths).
"Fully jabbed"? I wouldn't presume to know what @Jac35 regards as "fully jabbed".
But, for me, it is having the ones that our Health Authorities recommend AND have had the opportunity to have them. So-in this country, until this week, 12-17 year olds here have not been able to have the booster.
If the UK health authorities deem I need a 4th dose (vaccine or booster), I will have it. If they don't, I won't. Whole variety of reasons. Most important of which is that I trust our experts. Not unconditionally.
If the UK health authorities deem I need a 4th dose (vaccine or booster), I will have it. If they don't, I won't. Whole variety of reasons. Most important of which is that I trust our experts. Not unconditionally.
But a lot more than all the alternatives.
The WHO put out the message ‘ there are no treatments or cures for COVID 19 ‘ This was obviously a lie. So what laws have they broken?
If the UK health authorities deem I need a 4th dose (vaccine or booster), I will have it. If they don't, I won't. Whole variety of reasons. Most important of which is that I trust our experts. Not unconditionally.
But a lot more than all the alternatives.
The WHO put out the message ‘ there are no treatments or cures for COVID 19 ‘ This was obviously a lie. So what laws have they broken?
To the best of my knowledge, making statements that are lies is not usually against the law. Something for which you should be profoundly grateful.
There are no "cures" for Covid 19.
"Treatments". There are many. Quite a lot are authorised by all the civilised world.
There also exist many supposed treatments that are not, but Dr Chilling believes otherwise. Obviously, the US FDA know nothing:-
If the UK health authorities deem I need a 4th dose (vaccine or booster), I will have it. If they don't, I won't. Whole variety of reasons. Most important of which is that I trust our experts. Not unconditionally.
But a lot more than all the alternatives.
The WHO put out the message ‘ there are no treatments or cures for COVID 19 ‘ This was obviously a lie. So what laws have they broken?
To the best of my knowledge, making statements that are lies is not usually against the law. Something for which you should be profoundly grateful.
There are no "cures" for Covid 19.
"Treatments". There are many. Quite a lot are authorised by all the civilised world.
There also exist many supposed treatments that are not, but Dr Chilling believes otherwise. Obviously, the US FDA know nothing:-
"It’s also of note that Itajaí actually saw the highest COVID-19 mortality rate in 2020 among the major cities in the state of Santa Catarina, another observation that casts doubt over whether the COVID-19 prevention program using ivermectin was actually effective.
Finally, at least two of the authors, Flavio Cadegiani and Juan Chamie, are members of a group called the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). This group, led by physicians Pierre Kory and Paul Marik, propagated unsupported claims about ivermectin as an effective COVID-19 treatment. Cadegiani is also the principal investigator of a clinical trial that is being investigated for potential violations of medical ethics and human rights by Brazil’s National Health Council, as reported by the British Medical Journal. Cadegiani and Lucy Kerr also have financial conflicts of interest from their work for a company that produces ivermectin."
Comments
Only 5.3m have had 3 doses, which you regard as fully jabbed.
Australia, like everywhere else, prioritises vaccination according to risk. As do people.
So-if 78% of Australians have had 2 vaccines, that percentage will increase with age.
So-less than 78% for under-40s (0 deaths) and massively more for over-70s (33 deaths).
"Fully jabbed"? I wouldn't presume to know what @Jac35 regards as "fully jabbed".
But, for me, it is having the ones that our Health Authorities recommend AND have had the opportunity to have them. So-in this country, until this week, 12-17 year olds here have not been able to have the booster.
If the UK health authorities deem I need a 4th dose (vaccine or booster), I will have it. If they don't, I won't. Whole variety of reasons. Most important of which is that I trust our experts. Not unconditionally.
But a lot more than all the alternatives.
If the UK health authorities deem I need a 4th dose (vaccine or booster), I will have it. If they don't, I won't. Whole variety of reasons. Most important of which is that I trust our experts. Not unconditionally.
But a lot more than all the alternatives.
The WHO put out the message ‘ there are no treatments or cures for COVID 19 ‘
This was obviously a lie.
So what laws have they broken?
This was obviously a lie.
So what laws have they broken?
To the best of my knowledge, making statements that are lies is not usually against the law. Something for which you should be profoundly grateful.
There are no "cures" for Covid 19.
"Treatments". There are many. Quite a lot are authorised by all the civilised world.
There also exist many supposed treatments that are not, but Dr Chilling believes otherwise. Obviously, the US FDA know nothing:-
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
When exactly did the WHO put out this message?
https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a-citywide-prospective-observational-study-of-223128-subjects-using-propensity-score-matching
There are no "cures" for Covid 19.
"Treatments". There are many. Quite a lot are authorised by all the civilised world.
There also exist many supposed treatments that are not, but Dr Chilling believes otherwise. Obviously, the US FDA know nothing:-
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
When exactly did the WHO put out this message?
They struggle with questions.
I thought you liked the facts.
How many times on other threads?
I dont think you have a clue about what a fact is.
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/ivermectin-study-itajai-contains-methodological-weaknesses-questionable-conclusions/
A long article. Here is just a bit of it:-
"It’s also of note that Itajaí actually saw the highest COVID-19 mortality rate in 2020 among the major cities in the state of Santa Catarina, another observation that casts doubt over whether the COVID-19 prevention program using ivermectin was actually effective.
Finally, at least two of the authors, Flavio Cadegiani and Juan Chamie, are members of a group called the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). This group, led by physicians Pierre Kory and Paul Marik, propagated unsupported claims about ivermectin as an effective COVID-19 treatment. Cadegiani is also the principal investigator of a clinical trial that is being investigated for potential violations of medical ethics and human rights by Brazil’s National Health Council, as reported by the British Medical Journal. Cadegiani and Lucy Kerr also have financial conflicts of interest from their work for a company that produces ivermectin."
To the best of my knowledge, making statements that are lies is not usually against the law. Something for which you should be profoundly grateful.
There are no "cures" for Covid 19.
"Treatments". There are many. Quite a lot are authorised by all the civilised world.
There also exist many supposed treatments that are not, but Dr Chilling believes otherwise. Obviously, the US FDA know nothing:-
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
When exactly did the WHO put out this message?
Inspector Chill was wondering about all the documentation on successfully treated patients, this was before the WHO made their announcements.
To the best of my knowledge, making statements that are lies is not usually against the law. Something for which you should be profoundly grateful.
There are no "cures" for Covid 19.
"Treatments". There are many. Quite a lot are authorised by all the civilised world.
There also exist many supposed treatments that are not, but Dr Chilling believes otherwise. Obviously, the US FDA know nothing:-
‘Cures’ and ‘ treatments’ must be socially distancing.
When exactly did the WHO put out this message?
Early 2020.
The WHO loves a tweet, which probably explains why they deleted so many.
The WHO loves a tweet, which probably explains why they deleted so many.
So-yet again. A statement designed to mislead.
You really should be ashamed of yourself.
You really should be ashamed of yourself.
You should know better by now Phil.
So-yet again. A statement designed to mislead.
You really should be ashamed of yourself.
It could be on the bid C thread, or I might have it archived. I’ll search. To be continued...not right this minute.