You want people to call you with two pairs when you have a straight! This is how you gain chips USUALLY, but **** happens to every player ( live or online ) What were the odds on Brighton hammering the Gooners 0-3 on Sunday? Just play small stakes if you can't accept being outdrawn.
You want people to call you with two pairs when you have a straight! This is how you gain chips USUALLY, but **** happens to every player ( live or online ) What were the odds on Brighton hammering the Gooners 0-3 on Sunday?
Just play small stakes
if you can't accept being outdrawn.
He does .......and he still moans
It is good for SKYPoker and @Tikay10 's Forum though,,,,,,at least it keeps it busy........ and it shows that SKYPoker offer the opportunity for all players to comment on Poker ......even if it's impossible to change the R.N.G. ......... because it is just that....... RANDOM
So, in your example, you then lose the next hand he has 800-1200, then next hand 1600-400, then he wins the game next hand. So how the fck are you winning some games then? Or are you not being entirely truthful?
i think i would just say it again.... not the brightest bloke around......
Just the FIRST ALL IN PREFLOP after cheaply giving away to decimate their stack. Thats the only hand that was giving one result. A shortstack all in preflop. Not a second one, not a third one.... the first one.
There was no opportunity to finish the game when they were shortstacked if there was an all in preflop... as they won with 3 of a kind or better as standard.
Although i was doing well on the site, it was not acceptable to me that in this situation there was no variation in the result.... and although i was winning later in the game, or sometimes losing, i didnt see why i should accept automatically losing any hands.
I am glad to say that a short stack does not automatically win the first all in preflop on Sky Poker.
Tell you what, Wad, I want to believe you. How about this?
I'll give £250 to a charity of your choice when you provide proof of losing 400 consecutive preflop all ins versus players with 200 chips or less in an Omaha HUSNG on 888. Proof will be an unedited HEM3 or PT database or continuously recorded footage.
Until you can provide this proof, you will no longer post anything here related to beats or the RNG.
Ive enjoyed how every post since has managed to swerve the 888 example, the one that can not be explained.....
888 should return to their old software, thats the only thing wrong over there......it used to be a nice alternative, now it is minging to look at and play on imo
"Perhaps the most famous example of the gambler's fallacy occurred in a game of roulette at the Monte Carlo Casino on August 18, 1913, when the ball fell in black 26 times in a row. This was an extremely uncommon occurrence: the probability of a sequence of either red or black occurring 26 times in a row is (18/37)26-1 or around 1 in 66.6 million,"
edit: sure it aint 400 times, those numbers seem untrue, but everyone is looking at these "something is not right posts" and thinking gamblers fallacy.
btw 66.6 million, and all the numbers add up to 666.......suspicious or what..... haha....the devil is always in the detail.
I think you'll all find that Waddy has made a list on a piece of paper with his 400+ all in losses on it, as he only records his losses and not his wins, this list then reads that it has happened 400 times in a row. It's an easy mistake to make when you are deluded and probably the world's most prominent example of someone suffering from confirmation bias.
Enut: 'when you are deluded ' DRukh ' you're an insufferable ****' Jac35 'Completely comfortable with calling you a liar' WeKnow who it wasMysteryMan 'retarded'
I wish to thank everyone who is trying to save me, the above is very much appreciated!
Comments
It is good for SKYPoker and @Tikay10 's Forum though,,,,,,at least it keeps it busy........ and it shows that SKYPoker offer the opportunity for all players to comment on Poker ......even if it's impossible to change the R.N.G. ......... because it is just that....... RANDOM
You know ....... a RANDOM TANDEM NUMBER GENERATOR
Man alive, read the post before answering!
There was no opportunity to finish the game when they were shortstacked if there was an all in preflop... as they won with 3 of a kind or better as standard.
Although i was doing well on the site, it was not acceptable to me that in this situation there was no variation in the result.... and although i was winning later in the game, or sometimes losing, i didnt see why i should accept automatically losing any hands.
I am glad to say that a short stack does not automatically win the first all in preflop on Sky Poker.
I know things get emotive, but let's not stoop to "retarded".
Post edited by moderator
I'll give £250 to a charity of your choice when you provide proof of losing 400 consecutive preflop all ins versus players with 200 chips or less in an Omaha HUSNG on 888. Proof will be an unedited HEM3 or PT database or continuously recorded footage.
Until you can provide this proof, you will no longer post anything here related to beats or the RNG.
Deal?
Anyway i have to give it a rest.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy
"Perhaps the most famous example of the gambler's fallacy occurred in a game of roulette at the Monte Carlo Casino on August 18, 1913, when the ball fell in black 26 times in a row. This was an extremely uncommon occurrence: the probability of a sequence of either red or black occurring 26 times in a row is (18/37)26-1 or around 1 in 66.6 million,"
edit: sure it aint 400 times, those numbers seem untrue, but everyone is looking at these "something is not right posts" and thinking gamblers fallacy.
btw 66.6 million, and all the numbers add up to 666.......suspicious or what..... haha....the devil is always in the detail.
for anyone that never knew;
https://www.ripleys.com/weird-news/roulette-wheel-666/
...... we can comment on 'your thread'
DRukh ' you're an insufferable ****'
Jac35 'Completely comfortable with calling you a liar'
WeKnow who it wasMysteryMan 'retarded'
I wish to thank everyone who is trying to save me, the above is very much appreciated!