You said this, I have donated to Marks Charities in the past but there is something about this one that makes me hesitate..... sure others have concerns hence the poor response.
I think that they seem to be above board.
Yes, they do a great job every year like all other Charities which people support.
Sorry if you read into my post ( dodgy ) not intended.
You said this, I have donated to Marks Charities in the past but there is something about this one that makes me hesitate..... sure others have concerns hence the poor response.
I think that they seem to be above board.
Yes, they do a great job every year like all other Charities which people support.
Sorry if you read into my post ( dodgy ) not intended.
You said this, I have donated to Marks Charities in the past but there is something about this one that makes me hesitate..... sure others have concerns hence the poor response.
I think that they seem to be above board.
Yes, they do a great job every year like all other Charities which people support.
Sorry if you read into my post ( dodgy ) not intended.
The good thing is that there appears to have been a boost in the number of reads.
"Your pet Charity"..... good for you, makes you feel good then happy days.
I see it as Government Dept that's been allowed to evolve into full blown Charity.
Hence my hesitation to donate.
I dont think that the above does clarify your silliness.
Been called names before ...... perfer " Idiot " Wish you good luck with your project.
Thanks. I was merely responding to what you said.
goldon said: Just to clarify my silliness ....
Secondly, I wasnt clear on what you meant, regarding the comment below.
I see it as Government Dept that's been allowed to evolve into full blown Charity.
And therefore I didnt think that it explained your silliness, hesitation to donate, or anything else.
Just to clarify my silliness ....
"Your pet Charity"..... good for you, makes you feel good then happy days.
I see it as Government Dept that's been allowed to evolve into full blown Charity.
Hence my hesitation to donate.
I am not even sure it is my pet charity. I just thought it was worth donating to. I appreciate that whether you donate or not, is completely your choice, but I am struggling to understand what you are trying to say. I initially referred to your comments as being silly, as you seemed to be casting aspersions about a Charity that has been running since 1967. I was referring to your comments being silly rather than you.
"The Rise of the Charity Machines" 40 years in the making taking responsibility for the problem away from Government where it was created and should have been funded.
This is not a serious statement as I don't do serious. fwiw
"The Rise of the Charity Machines" 40 years in the making taking responsibility for the problem away from Government where it was created and should have been funded.
This is not a serious statement as I don't do serious. fwiw
I dont think that they are taking responsibility for the problem, as the problem, in this case homelessness, clearly still exists. Although they probably alleviate it a little, from time to time. In this case at Christmas.
If you consider my comments silly I will refrain from posting on your threads.
What did you mean?
goldon Member Posts: 8,079 November 28 I have donated to Marks Charities in the past but there is something about this one that makes me hesitate..... sure others have concerns hence the poor response.
Comments
Sorry if you read into my post ( dodgy ) not intended.
40 years of Crisis at Christmas
"Your pet Charity"..... good for you, makes you feel good then happy days.
I see it as Government Dept that's been allowed to evolve into full blown Charity.
Hence my hesitation to donate.
Christmas must be an awful time to be alone, and skint.
Particularly if we get a bit of snow.
40 years of Crisis at Christmas
I was merely responding to what you said.
goldon said:
Just to clarify my silliness ....
Secondly, I wasnt clear on what you meant, regarding the comment below.
I see it as Government Dept that's been allowed to evolve into full blown Charity.
And therefore I didnt think that it explained your silliness, hesitation to donate, or anything else.
Just to clarify my silliness ....
"Your pet Charity"..... good for you, makes you feel good then happy days.
I see it as Government Dept that's been allowed to evolve into full blown Charity.
Hence my hesitation to donate.
I am not even sure it is my pet charity.
I just thought it was worth donating to.
I appreciate that whether you donate or not, is completely your choice, but I am struggling to understand what you are trying to say.
I initially referred to your comments as being silly, as you seemed to be casting aspersions about a Charity that has been running since 1967.
I was referring to your comments being silly rather than you.
"The Rise of the Charity Machines" 40 years in the making taking responsibility for the problem away from Government where it was created and should have been funded.
This is not a serious statement as I don't do serious. fwiw
Although they probably alleviate it a little, from time to time.
In this case at Christmas.
goldon Member Posts: 8,079
November 28
I have donated to Marks Charities in the past but there is something about this one that makes me hesitate..... sure others have concerns hence the poor response.