You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.

You might need to refresh your page afterwards.

New Poker Points system.

Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
edited December 2012 in Poker Chat
 Can someone explain to me how people playing badly (by being in nearly every hand) being rewarded more poker points than someone who plays a wiser game is a good thing.

 Quote from E-mail recieved "Essentially it is a fairer way of distributing Poker Points".

 Are Sky trying to encourage bad play?

 Check your E-Mail inbox for details on new System!
«134

Comments

  • TINTINTINTIN Member Posts: 1,612
    edited November 2012
    In Response to New Poker Points system.:
     Can someone explain to me how people playing badly (by being in nearly every hand) being rewarded more poker points than someone who plays a wiser game is a good thing.  Quote from E-mail recieved " Essentially it is a fairer way of distributing Poker Points".  Are Sky trying to encourage bad play?  Check your E-Mail inbox for details on new System!
    Posted by Donut64
    ive got the email and its also on the earning poker points page of the promos section.

    im trying to digest the changes they are implememnting before saying anything stupid on here.
  • percival09percival09 Member Posts: 3,804
    edited November 2012
    it pays people rakeback who are involved in pots. It stops people playing like nits and being paid the same amount of rakeback than people who are more active. Why should players who are nits get the same amount of rakeback as the players who actually contribute to the rake more frequently? Since when has being a nit been a wiser game? How is it encouraging bad play? 
  • bearlytherbearlyther Member Posts: 1,757
    edited November 2012
    This is good for the game it will create action.  It is not bad play by playing a high percentage of hands if you are a competant player and know how to play down the various streets.  If Phil Ivey played on sky he would be involved in 70% of pots imo as he would feel he would have a massive edge post flop.
  • Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
    edited November 2012
    It is hard enough at lower levels to raise pre without 3 or 4 callers without giving them this incentive! How can I improve my game when people are being encouraged to be in every pot?

    ps. looks like Im in a minority on this one! LOL


  • Curt360x27Curt360x27 Member Posts: 490
    edited November 2012
    It creates a far better system in which the 'fish' will be given more money back at the end of the month than they would get on the current system. The more money you contribute to pots the more rakeback you should receive? Yes? This will mean a healthier site for the recreational players to play on which paramount for the site to keep growing.  

    I'm sure beaneh will explain better in due course.
  • liamboi11liamboi11 Member Posts: 2,141
    edited November 2012
    yeah i think it will be good not just for me because i play quite a lot of flops dont think that makes me a bad player because im more laggy than some but will defo be good overall imo.Also like others have stated they are far too many nits just waiting to play the nuts or 2nd nuts if they feel lucky.
  • percival09percival09 Member Posts: 3,804
    edited November 2012
    because in all honesty, and without meaning to sound rude, there really is zero argument for the old rakeback method. this beats it hands down and all sites use this. Paying each payer the same amount is absurd
  • percival09percival09 Member Posts: 3,804
    edited November 2012
    e.g. I go into tesco every other day and buy a lot of products and therefore accumulate points on my club card freqently - I don't expect other shoppers to get the same amount as me for shopping at the same supermarket less frequently
  • scotty77scotty77 Member Posts: 4,970
    edited November 2012
    haha Percival I just used the same analogy to explain it on a thread on facebook!

    but yeah this is a real positive change for the cash games on the site and a far fairer way of awarding poker points to the players on the site. 
  • TINTINTINTIN Member Posts: 1,612
    edited November 2012
    i agree the weighted contribution is a better system to be used than was the current model. its been said above so i will not go into it again.

    where i think SKY has missed a trick, and i dont know if others will agree with me, is that the points offered per £ raked is still not in proportion to the other disciplines. 6 points per £1 raked in cash games compared to 10 points per £ raked in stt/mtt. i would love to know the reason behind this. even with keeping happy hours the difference still isnt made up. i feel this was the chance to flatten everything out and end untold debates about who gets the better deal thru c4p.
  • Donut64Donut64 Member Posts: 2,666
    edited November 2012
    As said elsewhere at tesco you can get your weekly shopping at tesco and be guaranteed your points will be worth cash at the end with poker points you can get 400+ points a month and they are  worth exactly nothing! But that is going of the point, myself I was just wondering how ot would effect the game at lower levels, personley I would prefer to just pay less rake and have no rakeback. Ps like Asda! LOL
  • YOUNG_GUNYOUNG_GUN Member Posts: 8,948
    edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: New Poker Points system.:
    e.g. I go into tesco every other day and buy a lot of products and therefore accumulate points on my club card freqently - I don't expect other shoppers to get the same amount as me for shopping at the same supermarket less frequently
    Posted by percival09
    Wins thread wp sir
  • beanehbeaneh Member Posts: 4,079
    edited November 2012
    LOL curt I was going to start typing then thought nah i'll just look up my posts in the other thread...


    Original discussion thread, pertinent posts on pages 3/4/5/6




    New system is fairer, aims the bonuses more sensibly though still needs tweaking as TinTin mentions the disparity with game type C4P rates.
  • 68Trebor68Trebor Member Posts: 1,944
    edited November 2012

     A great move, may even tempt me back to SKYPoker. 
     On second thoughts perhaps not until they up the %age of rakeback available to compete with other major sites.

  • CrazyBen23CrazyBen23 Member Posts: 865
    edited November 2012
    +1 tintin. why do stt's/mtt players get better value for this? meh, 6pts seems low
  • rancidrancid Member Posts: 5,947
    edited November 2012

    Don't think it will make a differance to the actual cash game play on Sky, multi table nits will play the same way and so will laggy spew monkeys

    so.... at least some spew will be returned in the form of rakeback

    At least it pays to drive the action on tables now, unlike before where it was just zZzZzZzZzz I have a set cash action
    +1
  • amanda1983amanda1983 Member Posts: 172
    edited November 2012
    how come you dont get anything until 500 points?? i only play a few times a month so never get to 500
  • therckttherckt Member Posts: 6
    edited November 2012
    There was a post in this thread that had some numbers showing average % of rakeback being recived and how low it is. It has surprisingly disappeared?
  • TommyDTommyD Member Posts: 4,389
    edited November 2012
    In Response to Re: New Poker Points system.:
    There was a post in this thread that had some numbers showing average % of rakeback being recived and how low it is. It has surprisingly disappeared?
    Posted by therckt
    I didn't see the post but were the numbers on it comparing C4P to the rakeback other sites in the industry offer to all at all times or to the affiliate deals you used to* be able to get on signing up to a site? (maybe still can, it's been a long time since I signed up to a site as I've already signed up to most, I very much doubt there are as many deals as there used to be).
  • percival09percival09 Member Posts: 3,804
    edited November 2012
    numbers weren't being compared to other sites. it basically said if you get 5,000 points, it means you get £90 back and youve paid over £800 in rake which = around 11% rakeback or something. hewas basically saying it isn't v.good
Sign In or Register to comment.