You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
Options
<3 ...
radzer02
Member Posts: 131
xxxx<3
.
.....
dfh
.
.....
dfh
You need to be logged in to your Sky Poker account above to post discussions and comments.
You might need to refresh your page afterwards.
radzer02
Member Posts: 131
Comments
Ive only played 1000 DYMs here, but i question you when you say "The DYM format induces more betting and a higher likely hood of more bad beats" The DYM format literally does the opposite, and if you find a table where too many people are playing too many hands then that's great for you.
let them go nuts and have there fun, while you take the prize money.
my experience of dyms is pretty much the opposite so far most the regs are folding too many hands and don't feel confident play post flop (this is not true of them all)
if you've got good solid opening ranges and are confident post flop dyms are not luck at all and you should crush them
1. skilled players who are regularly making a profit have an edge and are able to regularly make a profit. Which means hypothetically if you put the work in you could too. However how much work? some formats could take literally years to become profitable at. Then their is intelligence I have an ex who I genuinely reckon if they had one on one coaching 6 hours a day for several months would not be profitable at micro stakes mtts.
I think my favorite quote from her was "evolution is a lie, I mean humans have 97% DNA in common with Bananas" When I asked her for a source she said she had heard it somewhere and babbled on without giving source. When I said was it Kent Hovind she went ballistic and was like no one criticizes Kent Hovind he is a great man! She had been to private school her entire life and got mostly Cs.
but yeah assuming your of average intelligence one would assume with the right level of study you could beat the vast majority of beatable formats.
2. their is cheating going on, this can sometimes be the case, I have had my suspicions on dons before on every site I have played them on, but from my brief dipping in and out of dons on sky it is clear with the right level of study they are definitely beatable.
3. some sort of rig this would involve house players or etc but this one is a bit out there and I seriously doubt it.
4. the regs who appear to have won are just a case of extreme variance and in fact everyone is losing to the rake.
Generally I regularly look up my opponents for a few reasons. firstly to gage whether this format is beatable eg if all I am seeing is regs then its quite possible I am the fish. if all I see is fish then its quite possible the format is not beatable and everyone is losing to the rake.
Then there is also something for peace of mind or questioning myself eg if I lose a hand where I think the other guy was an idiot or did something very bad then I can sharkscope them and if they show as a very strong reg maybe they had a sophisticated play if they show up as strong loser it is likely they just played bad and got lucky. How often is this happening and what is the usual reason etc?
This is why I dont play cash as I cant get such numbers at cash games. Also game selection is a thing I have found some sites where the small stake games are actually tougher then the mid stake games at other sites.
b. @FeelGroggy correctly identified that you play mainly turbo DYM which are far more high variance.
c. You have managed to encourage @TheWaddy to comment.....which is unforgivable
All in all this thread is totally yawn.
Im happy to make my comment and leave it at that. But 2 come straight in and address me and not the boy radzer.....
Im kind of going to guess that wotever age i put, whether young or older, your gonna have a cracking reply Cammy... im not gonna set that comment up for u!
Radzer, i will try desperately to keep the conversation between you and me ...on your post that i wish to comment on.... though its difficult with the Sky 8. Unless you want to state that this is the best poker experience you have ever known or brush someones ego, this is not the place to converse with 'people'.
Me personally, i dont have an opinion either way about what you are experiencing
I had no reply lined up so you have misread that one. You do seem really set on a belief that there is a sort of 'tea club network' which is quite baffling. Can not see that myself and you have had better treatment in this forum than you really deserve.
Having been on Sky for a few years are the most domineering and misguided poster I have ever came across.
On your age and my question I would guess you are younger than 30 and you do act like a man-child. For your sake and the people in your life's sake I hope you are not much older than that as you have a lot of growing up to do.