In Response to Re: Sky Poker Rewards : Why? What level do you play? Do you get many mass multitablers? It will be a unpopular view with regs as it will limit them including myself. But long term it will be better. Whenever I have talked to recreational players the three things they hate about online poker are 1) online is rigged/bad beats 2) Tracking software/huds 3) people playing lots of tables (its just not poker apparantly) Posted by ajs4385
Even though yes limiting multi tabling would be good overall.
For a site to limit the amount you can play would just push business elsewhere.
So yes at the moment you may play 16 tables on SKY - if SKY limit to 6 then you would play 10 elsewhere
For SKY to push away a large chunk of their clients would be silly imo
IF somehow they could limit muulti tabling but still guarentee new clients coming onto the tables then I would personally love it. It could just end up with you playing lesser tables but against the same regs.
From what I see is a lack of people trying to start new tables, people not wanting to play HU or short handed to get action going. And this is something I can't understand because new tables starting attract new playing to join.
Don't think the problem is with multi tablers, the problem is in general most online players are selfish and do not even understand the give action to get action standpoint of regs like myself. Complete smash and grab attitude to nut peddle and bum hunt ATM's. Do these bum hunters actully give up some EV to ATM's just to guarentee action in future ? I don't think so, they just want to rip into ATM credit card and run.
Then wonder why ATM doesn't comeback and they can't play regs because they would be giving up too much EV! So you end up with no tables running and people refusing to play each other !
In Response to Re: Sky Poker Rewards : I am not complaining about multitabling. I love it. Its just about protecting people who fund the site. Plus when someone mass multitables it can ruin the games. watchin someone take ages to fold all the time. Doesnt bother me but I bet it would bother someone only on one table. Its just not poker isnt my argument? thats the people who fund the sites argument. Of course I would like a tables without regs who wouldnt. Posted by ajs4385
I've never noticed any significant difference between multitablers and single tablers in relation to time taken to make a decision. In fact in some instanes the regs are quicker to act (clicking the early fold button because there in involved in a more intense hand elsewhere for example).
re tables with no regs - there's going to be regs at all levels of poker (it's just the nature of the game) if they make money they're gonna come back again i.e. become regular players. There is some regs out there who are terrible though and I love seeing at my tables.
I really dont get this whole arguement in general, sorry. it just looks like to me people are complaining that good players are allowed to play several tables at once. In my opinion people can't really complain about having to play good players. The time they take to make a decison to me is just a excuse and not really a valid complaint.
Your missing the biggest point People who spend money on poker dont want to play against people who are playing 15 tables. They think its not poker, they think its a bot etc etc Iv heard numerous reasons over years. Obviously someone playing 15 tables is going to take more time than someone playing 2 tables Posted by ajs4385
You deffo have a valid point, they want to join games online and have a gg. They don't want to lose all the time and they don't wanna feel like they are being abused.
As said before these people are not idiot's
The issue here is how can Sky attract new players, would limiting number of tables really make a differance.
Comments
For a site to limit the amount you can play would just push business elsewhere.
So yes at the moment you may play 16 tables on SKY - if SKY limit to 6 then you would play 10 elsewhere
For SKY to push away a large chunk of their clients would be silly imo
IF somehow they could limit muulti tabling but still guarentee new clients coming onto the tables then I would personally love it. It could just end up with you playing lesser tables but against the same regs.
From what I see is a lack of people trying to start new tables, people not wanting to play HU or short handed to get action going. And this is something I can't understand because new tables starting attract new playing to join.
Don't think the problem is with multi tablers, the problem is in general most online players are selfish and do not even understand the give action to get action standpoint of regs like myself.
Complete smash and grab attitude to nut peddle and bum hunt ATM's.
Do these bum hunters actully give up some EV to ATM's just to guarentee action in future ?
I don't think so, they just want to rip into ATM credit card and run.
Then wonder why ATM doesn't comeback and they can't play regs because they would be giving up too much EV!
So you end up with no tables running and people refusing to play each other !
like lols
Seriously!
re tables with no regs - there's going to be regs at all levels of poker (it's just the nature of the game) if they make money they're gonna come back again i.e. become regular players. There is some regs out there who are terrible though and I love seeing at my tables.
I really dont get this whole arguement in general, sorry. it just looks like to me people are complaining that good players are allowed to play several tables at once. In my opinion people can't really complain about having to play good players. The time they take to make a decison to me is just a excuse and not really a valid complaint.
People who spend money on poker dont want to play against people who are playing 15 tables.
They think its not poker, they think its a bot etc etc Iv heard numerous reasons over years.
Obviously someone playing 15 tables is going to take more time than someone playing 2 tables
They don't want to lose all the time and they don't wanna feel like they are being abused.
As said before these people are not idiot's
The issue here is how can Sky attract new players, would limiting number of tables really make a differance.