Doubled up every leg of the quadpot. Need Rahmah or St Dunstan to place to get some money back but I expect I will need them both to place to get a profit and would be good if the fav doesnt place.
£1.16 back on the Quadpot so it's a £2.44 loss in real money £15.68 returns on the virtual Placepot so it's a £41.92 loss in play money Think I will separate virtual jackpot from virtual placepot and add a real quadpot total to OP. Posted by Phantom66
I haven't followed how you have all been doing thoroughly, but it doesn't seem that the results have been favourable. Are you all applying JACKPOT style perms (where you have to get the winner of the race) to the PLACEPOT.
I think this is why WYNNE has had more success with smaller single perms IMO.
In Response to Re: Phantom's Practice Perms : I haven't followed how you have all been doing thoroughly, but it doesn't seem that the results have been favourable. Are you all applying JACKPOT style perms (where you have to get the winner of the race) to the PLACEPOT. I think this is why WYNNE has had more success with smaller single perms IMO. Posted by MISTY4ME
To be fair to Phantom (And me as I am following a similar strategy), there hasn't really been enough sample size to make any judgements yet, and it's a work in progress.
Wynne has had some amazing big wins with his Placepot perms which is awesome! It would be virtually impossible to try and compete against his amazing results in the short term.
However, I wouldn't call his perms small. I believe his two biggest wins were on perms that had over 400 lines (correct me if I am wrong), so in fact very much advocating the potential of wider perms. I also believe that he puts two or three on per meeting sometimes.
Wynne certainly has had some great selections along with a perm strategy that is a good balance of favourites, mid-priced horses and the occasional outsider. This has allowed him good statistical coverage in each leg meaning he could win a small dividend for lots of lines or indeed a big dividend with albeit slightly less winning lines. What he appears to be doing is something similar to what Phantom and I are attempting to do, albeit with slightly less perms and more success.
I agree with your point that Placepot perms should be smaller than Jackpot perms, but we are picking meetings where we wouldn't attempt the Jackpot because the perms would need to be too big, so they are in fact smaller than what a Jackpot perm would be.
Personally, I think there are several statistical benefits of multi-perms, however, you may prove to be right, but more data is needed before writing it off imo.
The fact that every result is being recorded, means that over time, we will know if there is an edge or not, but I for one am not giving up just yet. :=)
Also, we quite enjoy trying to combine the statistics and the horse form reading, so win or lose, we like the challenge of it, of course as we put EVERY result out there for all to see, we are indeed, there to be shot at. Hopefully as time goes by, we will get an idea of what works and what doesn't, but a lot more data is required.
I am not generally trying to pick winners and use a jackpot perm as a placepot, allthough some races e.g eves fav, 3 horses 3/1 to 6/1 and 14/1 bar it's hard to justify putting any other than the top 4 in. Even if you find a lively outsider the chances are a high % of the entrants are going to get placed.
As I think we all realise the aim is try and win big the days that a couple of the favs do not place, must be impossible to consistently win small at these.
I probably could be more selective with meetings where there are a few opposable favourites but generally I am trying stuff out and seeing what I can learn.
So far I have a strike rate of 50% getting paid but making losses on all bar one attempt at placepots so not good reading.
It just adds a bit of a fun to a race meeting without laying cash on it, although not quite sure how I would feel with a full unit winning on a day that noone wins and payout would have been high 5 figures.
Thanks G. Yes I bust a perm but equity went up to £125. Fingers crossed for leg 6. Still live in the quadpot too with all 4 selections as per placepot in Leg 6. Posted by Phantom66
Comments
Wynne certainly has had some great selections along with a perm strategy that is a good balance of favourites, mid-priced horses and the occasional outsider. This has allowed him good statistical coverage in each leg meaning he could win a small dividend for lots of lines or indeed a big dividend with albeit slightly less winning lines. What he appears to be doing is something similar to what Phantom and I are attempting to do, albeit with slightly less perms and more success.
Personally, I think there are several statistical benefits of multi-perms, however, you may prove to be right, but more data is needed before writing it off imo.
The fact that every result is being recorded, means that over time, we will know if there is an edge or not, but I for one am not giving up just yet. :=)
Also, we quite enjoy trying to combine the statistics and the horse form reading, so win or lose, we like the challenge of it, of course as we put EVERY result out there for all to see, we are indeed, there to be shot at. Hopefully as time goes by, we will get an idea of what works and what doesn't, but a lot more data is required.
Great equity leg that one for you even though you bust one, looking good. :=)
PERM 1 looking hopeful!
Naps table checking still on ?