The article was from 3 years ago ..if you think he had any just cause in suing the writer /paper , then being a prominent solicitor , he would have done so by now .
3 years is a long time to find more evidence against him.
However, Mr Akunjee has previously said that no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police, arguing that Prevent, the Government’s counter-terror policy, is “straightforward, paid-for spying on the community”.
Appearing before the home affairs select committee yesterday, Mr Akunjee gave a less hardline view of the Prevent programme, telling MPs “some of the organisations that feed into Prevent are not good enough”.
Just for clarity and for balance...
1. There are no quote marks around the comment "no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police" so it is not a quote is it?
2. Where did the alleged quote that "[Prevent is] straightforward, paid-for spying on the community" come from?
If you want to discuss Prevent please start a new thread and I will happily comment in more detail as it is something that I am qualified to talk about.
Happy to educate you . As far as where did the 2nd point come from , no idea ..why don't you ask the Telegraph ? perhaps invite them to your own little thread on here.
We all get your real view on the subject now though
Oh the irony.
You didn't misquote me because you didn't use quotation marks but those same standards don't apply to the Telegraph?
I am only trying to hold you to the standards that you use to defend the alleged extremist TR (who you don't support apparently) to the alleged extremist Muslim solicitor.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that I said if those quotes are true then I would hope that the family distance themselves from him. I am against all forms of extremism and bigotry Islamic and Islamophobic are 2 sides of the same bad penny fuelling hatred and fear and dividing communities.
I also said that there were alleged quotes in there far worse than the Prevent quote (the direct quote) so @Rainman there is no point in keep hauling out more of them.
Worse than that I haven't even used the same words that you have .
Not defending anyone , I will leave that to you .
Your fiery rhetoric towards TR doesn't fuel hatred , then ?
However, Mr Akunjee has previously said that no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police, arguing that Prevent, the Government’s counter-terror policy, is “straightforward, paid-for spying on the community”.
Appearing before the home affairs select committee yesterday, Mr Akunjee gave a less hardline view of the Prevent programme, telling MPs “some of the organisations that feed into Prevent are not good enough”.
Just for clarity and for balance...
1. There are no quote marks around the comment "no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police" so it is not a quote is it?
2. Where did the alleged quote that "[Prevent is] straightforward, paid-for spying on the community" come from?
If you want to discuss Prevent please start a new thread and I will happily comment in more detail as it is something that I am qualified to talk about.
Happy to educate you . As far as where did the 2nd point come from , no idea ..why don't you ask the Telegraph ? perhaps invite them to your own little thread on here.
We all get your real view on the subject now though
Oh the irony.
You didn't misquote me because you didn't use quotation marks but those same standards don't apply to the Telegraph?
I am only trying to hold you to the standards that you use to defend the alleged extremist TR (who you don't support apparently) to the alleged extremist Muslim solicitor.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that I said if those quotes are true then I would hope that the family distance themselves from him. I am against all forms of extremism and bigotry Islamic and Islamophobic are 2 sides of the same bad penny fuelling hatred and fear and dividing communities.
I also said that there were alleged quotes in there far worse than the Prevent quote (the direct quote) so @Rainman there is no point in keep hauling out more of them.
Alleged ? You don't think advocating people not cooperate with terrorism police is extremist ? seriously you people aren't real ! And we all know if he didn't say that , he would have hauled the telegraph into court .
Alleged? Yes.
Advocating that people don't cooperate with terrorism police is wrong and depending on context it could be extremist. I only have this telegraph article to go on at the moment so I do not know if he said that or in what context.
Since when has not suing been an admission of guilt?
We all totally get where your sympathies lie now .
I doubt that very much, maybe you and Rainman would like to think so.
Where do you think my sympathies lie exactly?
Do I need to keep repeating, if true there are plenty of disgusting comments in there that I wholeheartedly disapprove of and condemn.
If the person acting on behalf of a Syrian refugee can be discredited then does that make TR right in what he said about the refugee?
My mum always said two wrongs don't make a right.
Do you not find it strange that a law firm from Brentford West London is representing them?
I find it strange that you quote me, highlight a question and then ask a different question.
The article was from 3 years ago ..if you think he had any just cause in suing the writer /paper , then being a prominent solicitor , he would have done so by now .
3 years is a long time to find more evidence against him.
However, Mr Akunjee has previously said that no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police, arguing that Prevent, the Government’s counter-terror policy, is “straightforward, paid-for spying on the community”.
Appearing before the home affairs select committee yesterday, Mr Akunjee gave a less hardline view of the Prevent programme, telling MPs “some of the organisations that feed into Prevent are not good enough”.
Just for clarity and for balance...
1. There are no quote marks around the comment "no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police" so it is not a quote is it?
2. Where did the alleged quote that "[Prevent is] straightforward, paid-for spying on the community" come from?
If you want to discuss Prevent please start a new thread and I will happily comment in more detail as it is something that I am qualified to talk about.
Happy to educate you . As far as where did the 2nd point come from , no idea ..why don't you ask the Telegraph ? perhaps invite them to your own little thread on here.
We all get your real view on the subject now though
Oh the irony.
You didn't misquote me because you didn't use quotation marks but those same standards don't apply to the Telegraph?
I am only trying to hold you to the standards that you use to defend the alleged extremist TR (who you don't support apparently) to the alleged extremist Muslim solicitor.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that I said if those quotes are true then I would hope that the family distance themselves from him. I am against all forms of extremism and bigotry Islamic and Islamophobic are 2 sides of the same bad penny fuelling hatred and fear and dividing communities.
I also said that there were alleged quotes in there far worse than the Prevent quote (the direct quote) so @Rainman there is no point in keep hauling out more of them.
Worse than that I haven't even used the same words that you have .
Not defending anyone , I will leave that to you .
Your fiery rhetoric towards TR doesn't fuel hatred , then ?
However, Mr Akunjee has previously said that no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police, arguing that Prevent, the Government’s counter-terror policy, is “straightforward, paid-for spying on the community”.
Appearing before the home affairs select committee yesterday, Mr Akunjee gave a less hardline view of the Prevent programme, telling MPs “some of the organisations that feed into Prevent are not good enough”.
Just for clarity and for balance...
1. There are no quote marks around the comment "no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police" so it is not a quote is it?
2. Where did the alleged quote that "[Prevent is] straightforward, paid-for spying on the community" come from?
If you want to discuss Prevent please start a new thread and I will happily comment in more detail as it is something that I am qualified to talk about.
Happy to educate you . As far as where did the 2nd point come from , no idea ..why don't you ask the Telegraph ? perhaps invite them to your own little thread on here.
We all get your real view on the subject now though
Oh the irony.
You didn't misquote me because you didn't use quotation marks but those same standards don't apply to the Telegraph?
I am only trying to hold you to the standards that you use to defend the alleged extremist TR (who you don't support apparently) to the alleged extremist Muslim solicitor.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that I said if those quotes are true then I would hope that the family distance themselves from him. I am against all forms of extremism and bigotry Islamic and Islamophobic are 2 sides of the same bad penny fuelling hatred and fear and dividing communities.
I also said that there were alleged quotes in there far worse than the Prevent quote (the direct quote) so @Rainman there is no point in keep hauling out more of them.
Alleged ? You don't think advocating people not cooperate with terrorism police is extremist ? seriously you people aren't real ! And we all know if he didn't say that , he would have hauled the telegraph into court .
Alleged? Yes.
Advocating that people don't cooperate with terrorism police is wrong and depending on context it could be extremist. I only have this telegraph article to go on at the moment so I do not know if he said that or in what context.
Since when has not suing been an admission of guilt?
We all totally get where your sympathies lie now .
I doubt that very much, maybe you and Rainman would like to think so.
Where do you think my sympathies lie exactly?
Do I need to keep repeating, if true there are plenty of disgusting comments in there that I wholeheartedly disapprove of and condemn.
If the person acting on behalf of a Syrian refugee can be discredited then does that make TR right in what he said about the refugee?
My mum always said two wrongs don't make a right.
Do you not find it strange that a law firm from Brentford West London is representing them?
I find it strange that you quote me, highlight a question and then ask a different question.
The article was from 3 years ago ..if you think he had any just cause in suing the writer /paper , then being a prominent solicitor , he would have done so by now .
3 years is a long time to find more evidence against him.
However, Mr Akunjee has previously said that no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police, arguing that Prevent, the Government’s counter-terror policy, is “straightforward, paid-for spying on the community”.
Appearing before the home affairs select committee yesterday, Mr Akunjee gave a less hardline view of the Prevent programme, telling MPs “some of the organisations that feed into Prevent are not good enough”.
Just for clarity and for balance...
1. There are no quote marks around the comment "no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police" so it is not a quote is it?
2. Where did the alleged quote that "[Prevent is] straightforward, paid-for spying on the community" come from?
If you want to discuss Prevent please start a new thread and I will happily comment in more detail as it is something that I am qualified to talk about.
Happy to educate you . As far as where did the 2nd point come from , no idea ..why don't you ask the Telegraph ? perhaps invite them to your own little thread on here.
We all get your real view on the subject now though
Oh the irony.
You didn't misquote me because you didn't use quotation marks but those same standards don't apply to the Telegraph?
I am only trying to hold you to the standards that you use to defend the alleged extremist TR (who you don't support apparently) to the alleged extremist Muslim solicitor.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that I said if those quotes are true then I would hope that the family distance themselves from him. I am against all forms of extremism and bigotry Islamic and Islamophobic are 2 sides of the same bad penny fuelling hatred and fear and dividing communities.
I also said that there were alleged quotes in there far worse than the Prevent quote (the direct quote) so @Rainman there is no point in keep hauling out more of them.
Worse than that I haven't even used the same words that you have .
Not defending anyone , I will leave that to you .
Your fiery rhetoric towards TR doesn't fuel hatred , then ?
However, Mr Akunjee has previously said that no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police, arguing that Prevent, the Government’s counter-terror policy, is “straightforward, paid-for spying on the community”.
Appearing before the home affairs select committee yesterday, Mr Akunjee gave a less hardline view of the Prevent programme, telling MPs “some of the organisations that feed into Prevent are not good enough”.
Just for clarity and for balance...
1. There are no quote marks around the comment "no Muslim should co-operate with anti-terror police" so it is not a quote is it?
2. Where did the alleged quote that "[Prevent is] straightforward, paid-for spying on the community" come from?
If you want to discuss Prevent please start a new thread and I will happily comment in more detail as it is something that I am qualified to talk about.
Happy to educate you . As far as where did the 2nd point come from , no idea ..why don't you ask the Telegraph ? perhaps invite them to your own little thread on here.
We all get your real view on the subject now though
Oh the irony.
You didn't misquote me because you didn't use quotation marks but those same standards don't apply to the Telegraph?
I am only trying to hold you to the standards that you use to defend the alleged extremist TR (who you don't support apparently) to the alleged extremist Muslim solicitor.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that I said if those quotes are true then I would hope that the family distance themselves from him. I am against all forms of extremism and bigotry Islamic and Islamophobic are 2 sides of the same bad penny fuelling hatred and fear and dividing communities.
I also said that there were alleged quotes in there far worse than the Prevent quote (the direct quote) so @Rainman there is no point in keep hauling out more of them.
Alleged ? You don't think advocating people not cooperate with terrorism police is extremist ? seriously you people aren't real ! And we all know if he didn't say that , he would have hauled the telegraph into court .
Alleged? Yes.
Advocating that people don't cooperate with terrorism police is wrong and depending on context it could be extremist. I only have this telegraph article to go on at the moment so I do not know if he said that or in what context.
Since when has not suing been an admission of guilt?
We all totally get where your sympathies lie now .
I doubt that very much, maybe you and Rainman would like to think so.
Where do you think my sympathies lie exactly?
Do I need to keep repeating, if true there are plenty of disgusting comments in there that I wholeheartedly disapprove of and condemn.
If the person acting on behalf of a Syrian refugee can be discredited then does that make TR right in what he said about the refugee?
My mum always said two wrongs don't make a right.
Do you not find it strange that a law firm from Brentford West London is representing them?
I find it strange that you quote me, highlight a question and then ask a different question.
My last post was ask me a question.
I did. You highlighted it. Then ignored me and asked me a question about office location.
The question was...
If the person acting on behalf of a Syrian refugee can be discredited then does that make TR right in what he said about the refugee?
Should I be surprised that the Daily Mail is ranting about the "left" protesters instead of standing up for the victims and asking important questions of the Tory Council?
If the "left activists" were so wrong about the Tory Council in Kensington, why did Theresa May kick them out?
Here are some quotes within the above article, all of the ones in fact where Mr Akunjee is quoted...
A lawyer who once said no Muslim should ever co-operate with British police
I still haven't found the original quote that proves he actually said that and shows context. Although now apparently it related to all British Police not Anti-Terrorism police.
Writing online beside footage of the burning building, he said: ‘I bet you some Tories look at that video and see a solution to benefits claims... sick people.’
There were some very sick quotes and memes circulating at the time saying much worse than that about the victims of that tragedy. Of course you won't have seen any, shared any or laughed at any.
Claiming the tragedy will ultimately reveal ‘criminal profiteering and neglect for life’,
Let's wait and see what the inquiry says.
Mr Akunjee also called for ‘some Tories’ to be wrapped in the cladding said to be partly responsible for the blaze. He said: ‘Ask them if they trust in fire safety regs for council housing... people need to go to jail for a long time on this one.’
Wrapping the Tories in the cladding might have crossed a line. What was the full context? If he was asking whether the Tory councillors would like their homes to be wrapped in the cladding (that clearly was partly responsible for the blaze) then that would be a fair point.
I do hope that some people eventually are held accountable for that tragedy.
Should I be surprised that the Daily Mail is ranting about the "left" protesters instead of standing up for the victims and asking important questions of the Tory Council?
If the "left activists" were so wrong about the Tory Council in Kensington, why did Theresa May kick them out?
Here are some quotes within the above article, all of the ones in fact where Mr Akunjee is quoted...
A lawyer who once said no Muslim should ever co-operate with British police
I still haven't found the original quote that proves he actually said that and shows context. Although now apparently it related to all British Police not Anti-Terrorism police.
Writing online beside footage of the burning building, he said: ‘I bet you some Tories look at that video and see a solution to benefits claims... sick people.’
There were some very sick quotes and memes circulating at the time saying much worse than that about the victims of that tragedy. Of course you won't have seen any, shared any or laughed at any.
Claiming the tragedy will ultimately reveal ‘criminal profiteering and neglect for life’,
Let's wait and see what the inquiry says.
Mr Akunjee also called for ‘some Tories’ to be wrapped in the cladding said to be partly responsible for the blaze. He said: ‘Ask them if they trust in fire safety regs for council housing... people need to go to jail for a long time on this one.’
Wrapping the Tories in the cladding might have crossed a line. What was the full context? If he was asking whether the Tory councillors would like their homes to be wrapped in the cladding (that clearly was partly responsible for the blaze) then that would be a fair point.
I do hope that some people eventually are held accountable for that tragedy.
As a solicitor i am sure if he meant their houses, he would of said houses.
Should I be surprised that the Daily Mail is ranting about the "left" protesters instead of standing up for the victims and asking important questions of the Tory Council?
If the "left activists" were so wrong about the Tory Council in Kensington, why did Theresa May kick them out?
Here are some quotes within the above article, all of the ones in fact where Mr Akunjee is quoted...
A lawyer who once said no Muslim should ever co-operate with British police
I still haven't found the original quote that proves he actually said that and shows context. Although now apparently it related to all British Police not Anti-Terrorism police.
Writing online beside footage of the burning building, he said: ‘I bet you some Tories look at that video and see a solution to benefits claims... sick people.’
There were some very sick quotes and memes circulating at the time saying much worse than that about the victims of that tragedy. Of course you won't have seen any, shared any or laughed at any.
Claiming the tragedy will ultimately reveal ‘criminal profiteering and neglect for life’,
Let's wait and see what the inquiry says.
Mr Akunjee also called for ‘some Tories’ to be wrapped in the cladding said to be partly responsible for the blaze. He said: ‘Ask them if they trust in fire safety regs for council housing... people need to go to jail for a long time on this one.’
Wrapping the Tories in the cladding might have crossed a line. What was the full context? If he was asking whether the Tory councillors would like their homes to be wrapped in the cladding (that clearly was partly responsible for the blaze) then that would be a fair point.
I do hope that some people eventually are held accountable for that tragedy.
As a solicitor i am sure if he meant their houses, he would of said houses.
Maybe but when the only part in quotes is "some tories" it is hard to know what he said.
Did you have a good laugh at some of the memes aimed at the Muslims/Refugees/benefits claimants that died in the tradegy.
I think we can safely add another one to the list ...radical extremist sympathiser, he can slot right in between the Ira supporter and the animal torturer. Vile creatures !
Should I be surprised that the Daily Mail is ranting about the "left" protesters instead of standing up for the victims and asking important questions of the Tory Council?
If the "left activists" were so wrong about the Tory Council in Kensington, why did Theresa May kick them out?
Here are some quotes within the above article, all of the ones in fact where Mr Akunjee is quoted...
A lawyer who once said no Muslim should ever co-operate with British police
I still haven't found the original quote that proves he actually said that and shows context. Although now apparently it related to all British Police not Anti-Terrorism police.
Writing online beside footage of the burning building, he said: ‘I bet you some Tories look at that video and see a solution to benefits claims... sick people.’
There were some very sick quotes and memes circulating at the time saying much worse than that about the victims of that tragedy. Of course you won't have seen any, shared any or laughed at any.
Claiming the tragedy will ultimately reveal ‘criminal profiteering and neglect for life’,
Let's wait and see what the inquiry says.
Mr Akunjee also called for ‘some Tories’ to be wrapped in the cladding said to be partly responsible for the blaze. He said: ‘Ask them if they trust in fire safety regs for council housing... people need to go to jail for a long time on this one.’
Wrapping the Tories in the cladding might have crossed a line. What was the full context? If he was asking whether the Tory councillors would like their homes to be wrapped in the cladding (that clearly was partly responsible for the blaze) then that would be a fair point.
I do hope that some people eventually are held accountable for that tragedy.
As a solicitor i am sure if he meant their houses, he would of said houses.
Maybe but when the only part in quotes is "some tories" it is hard to know what he said.
Did you have a good laugh at some of the memes aimed at the Muslims/Refugees/benefits claimants that died in the tradegy.
Comments
https://www.pressreader.com/similar/283124248882569
The question was...
If the person acting on behalf of a Syrian refugee can be discredited then does that make TR right in what he said about the refugee?
The question was...
If the person acting on behalf of a Syrian refugee can be discredited then does that make TR right in what he said about the refugee?
No he was wrong to say what he did, but has already admitted he was duped.
Edit. I have found an article relating to Grenfell in the Daily Mail from 2017 is that the one you mean?
Farage needs new Sensible Party ...... May needs Miracle.
only thing fake here is you .
Should I be surprised that the Daily Mail is ranting about the "left" protesters instead of standing up for the victims and asking important questions of the Tory Council?
If the "left activists" were so wrong about the Tory Council in Kensington, why did Theresa May kick them out?
Here are some quotes within the above article, all of the ones in fact where Mr Akunjee is quoted...
A lawyer who once said no Muslim should ever co-operate with British police
I still haven't found the original quote that proves he actually said that and shows context. Although now apparently it related to all British Police not Anti-Terrorism police.
Writing online beside footage of the burning building, he said: ‘I bet you some Tories look at that video and see a solution to benefits claims... sick people.’
There were some very sick quotes and memes circulating at the time saying much worse than that about the victims of that tragedy. Of course you won't have seen any, shared any or laughed at any.
Claiming the tragedy will ultimately reveal ‘criminal profiteering and neglect for life’,
Let's wait and see what the inquiry says.
Mr Akunjee also called for ‘some Tories’ to be wrapped in the cladding said to be partly responsible for the blaze.
He said: ‘Ask them if they trust in fire safety regs for council housing... people need to go to jail for a long time on this one.’
Wrapping the Tories in the cladding might have crossed a line. What was the full context? If he was asking whether the Tory councillors would like their homes to be wrapped in the cladding (that clearly was partly responsible for the blaze) then that would be a fair point.
I do hope that some people eventually are held accountable for that tragedy.
But you carry on sticking up for him and trying to find any reason you can to discredit the articles . He obv also didn't sue the Daily mail either .
I thought your only concern was for victims.
Do you have any sympathy for the Grenfell victims?
Did you have a good laugh at some of the memes aimed at the Muslims/Refugees/benefits claimants that died in the tradegy.
It is clearly there in full in my post.