I am sure many professional online poker players have at some point done this at work. The issue is that work would be in their own home in their own privacy.
Professional poker players are self employed, and are free to conduct their working day as they see fit. A Cabinet Minister is paid around £150k per year, funded by the tax payer. They therefore have a responsibility to do their jobs, rather than watching po rn when they are supposed to be working.
So the issue is not whether someone watched **** at work the issue is regarding watching **** in public.
The issue is that a CM whose wages are paid by the taxpayer, was caught watching po rn while he was supposed to be working, on more than one occasion. Secondly he was watching the po rn in view of a number of female colleagues.
I remember one time when I was on a plane and a women went ballistic about a guy allegedly watching ****, during the flight.
Why wouldnt she?
The flight attendants response rightly or wrongly was so what if he wants to do that. So then the women loudly claimed it was child **** and demanded they do something about it and suddenly the issue got more serious.
The flight attendant was clearly wrong. Watching any po rn within view of others is undoubtedly offensive. The possession of child po rnography is illegal, often results in offenders being jailed, and quite rightly so.
What the actual outcome of this was I will never know. this was on window seats and I was in the middle row a few rows back.
The seating was irrelevant.
The whole plane noticed this commotion though.
So the moral of all of this is, do not watch **** in public, but then again if you frequent kink clubs as some people I know have then people watch **** in groups there sometimes. However since everyone accepts there I guess its okay.
So really the moral is do not watch child **** ever, and do not watch **** in public unless it is at a kink club in which case it is okay.
The reason I worry about you is that you often seem unable to recognise the issues involved. I think that the fact that you were able to write the above is proof of this.
So why do you worry about me?
Okay I will go with this. Firstly the story about the plane did happen,
Why would you say that, when I dont believe anyone has disputed that it did. Although I must admit that the story didnt ring true. You do have previous for making up stories on the forum.
however I am clearly playing a bit of a character and been silly.
What does this actually mean? Are you saying in the first half of the sentence that the story was true, and in the second half that you made it up? Are you regularly playing a part, and making up stories? I can vouch for the fact that you are regularly being silly, but not necessarily funny.
The thing is I am aware that I am a bit of a character myself,
Blowing your own trumpet is not usually a good thing. People often see themselves differently to how other people see them.
heck where ever I go people never forget me.
One girl on a sausage counter is not a big enough sample size to prove your case, and a couple of months is probably not a big enough timespan to prove "never".
There was a German sausage stall at the Christmas market in my town they did not come back until the summer. one of the girls working their mentioned she remembered me from Christmas how do I stand out that much?
People have stood out to me for all sorts of reasons. For example because they have been rude, particularly stupid, very fat, extremely thin, having a huge head, or a massive nose. Other people have impressed me because they are entertaining, interesting or funny, although this would be less likely after a 5 minute encounter.
they literally serve thousands of people a day and this is based of one five minute encounter?
How many thousand? What do you think made you stand out?
However sometimes I parody my own character and play it up for a sense of humor. I think a very large part of the sky poker community who read the forums recognize this.
What makes you say that? Any proof?
Yes I am more then aware that watching **** in public is not acceptable. I am aware that if I am paid to do a job watching **** during that time is unacceptable. Where as if I am self employed its not really anyone else's business what I do unless I am in public and certain social norms etc.
Well done. A very large part of the Sky Poker community may recognise you for stating the blindingly obvious in future, as well. Are there no limits to your talents?
You get so wound up over small things and take it so seriously. Trying to break down every single little point, like some sort of lawyer in a court room.
I am very calm, and dont get wound up very easily. Although I do take a dim view of people making stuff up, and representing it as the truth. If the forum was a court room, you would be getting more porridge than Boris Becker.
Dude I am just a guy that struggles to say stuff succinctly (still very worried about the grade for my statistics essay not got it back yet) and thinks differently to most people. I have been mocked for it harshly in the past and it used to get to me now I just have a laugh with it.
I havent a clue why you would think that this would have anything to do with the made up stuff that you post.
Its like you imagine some big drama or big fight on the forums and take it so seriously when in reality I am just posting comments casually.
I am merely debating the content of what you have posted.
You went off on like a 3 page tirade over one small tease thread I made.
I have never posted a 3 page tirade.
You take things far to seriously mate, maybe you just need to chillax a little.
What makes you think you are qualified, or even capable of offering any advice, to anyone?
As I have said earlier, I dont think that discussing child po rnography warrants any humour. It is something that, in my view, should be taken seriously at all times. I think you made up the story about the guy on the plane. It was a silly story, as you couldnt even come up with an ending. Not everything that is silly, is funny, sometimes things are just silly, and not funny, or memorable.
It does not appear on my computer. That link says "page not found". I think the problem is that the Sky rude words filter has stopped the link working. Po rn has become ****-so need to retype that word
It does not appear on my computer. That link says "page not found". I think the problem is that the Sky rude words filter has stopped the link working. Po rn has become ****-so need to retype that word
It is just Ben Wallace commenting on how shameful it was. Printing a picture of a Minister below a headline like that is rather stupid.
It is really stupid, unless of course it is him. Whats more if you do a yahoo search "who is tory po rn mp" his photo comes up under "top stories" with the headline alongside, and a link to this article.
It does not appear on my computer. That link says "page not found". I think the problem is that the Sky rude words filter has stopped the link working. Po rn has become ****-so need to retype that word
It is just Ben Wallace commenting on how shameful it was. Printing a picture of a Minister below a headline like that is rather stupid.
It is really stupid, unless of course it is him. Whats more if you do a yahoo search "who is tory po rn mp" his photo comes up under "top stories" with the headline alongside, and a link to this article.
It does not appear on my computer. That link says "page not found". I think the problem is that the Sky rude words filter has stopped the link working. Po rn has become ****-so need to retype that word
It is just Ben Wallace commenting on how shameful it was. Printing a picture of a Minister below a headline like that is rather stupid.
It is really stupid, unless of course it is him. Whats more if you do a yahoo search "who is tory po rn mp" his photo comes up under "top stories" with the headline alongside, and a link to this article.
Which is precisely why it is defamatory.
Strangely if you do the same search on Bing, the only personal photo that appears on the first page is again Ben Wallace, with a headline below saying,
Boris Johnson slams 'totally unacceptable' behaviour of Tory MP seen watching ****
Revealed: Tory accused of watching **** in the House of Commons is Tiverton MP Neil Parish and he has reported himself to the Commons Standards watchdog
Neil Parish was today dramatically revealed as the Tory MP accused of watching **** in the Commons. The MP for Tiverton and Honiton has had the party whip suspended after finally being identified following days of fevered speculation. He has referred himself to the standards watchdog over allegations that he had been seen watching adult material in the House by two female colleagues. A spokeswoman for Chief Whip Chris Heaton-Harris said: 'Having spoken to the Chief Whip this afternoon, Neil Parish MP is reporting himself to the Standards Committee of the House of Commons. 'Mr Parish has been suspended from the Conservative Whip pending the outcome of that investigation.' It is understood a process has now been launched through Parliament's independent complaints and grievance scheme (ICGS). Mr Parish was asked about the situation when he was interviewed on GB News earlier this week, and said 'you are going to get people that step over the line'.
I am sure many professional online poker players have at some point done this at work. The issue is that work would be in their own home in their own privacy.
Professional poker players are self employed, and are free to conduct their working day as they see fit. A Cabinet Minister is paid around £150k per year, funded by the tax payer. They therefore have a responsibility to do their jobs, rather than watching po rn when they are supposed to be working.
So the issue is not whether someone watched **** at work the issue is regarding watching **** in public.
The issue is that a CM whose wages are paid by the taxpayer, was caught watching po rn while he was supposed to be working, on more than one occasion. Secondly he was watching the po rn in view of a number of female colleagues.
I remember one time when I was on a plane and a women went ballistic about a guy allegedly watching ****, during the flight.
Why wouldnt she?
The flight attendants response rightly or wrongly was so what if he wants to do that. So then the women loudly claimed it was child **** and demanded they do something about it and suddenly the issue got more serious.
The flight attendant was clearly wrong. Watching any po rn within view of others is undoubtedly offensive. The possession of child po rnography is illegal, often results in offenders being jailed, and quite rightly so.
What the actual outcome of this was I will never know. this was on window seats and I was in the middle row a few rows back.
The seating was irrelevant.
The whole plane noticed this commotion though.
So the moral of all of this is, do not watch **** in public, but then again if you frequent kink clubs as some people I know have then people watch **** in groups there sometimes. However since everyone accepts there I guess its okay.
So really the moral is do not watch child **** ever, and do not watch **** in public unless it is at a kink club in which case it is okay.
The reason I worry about you is that you often seem unable to recognise the issues involved. I think that the fact that you were able to write the above is proof of this.
So why do you worry about me?
Okay I will go with this. Firstly the story about the plane did happen,
Why would you say that, when I dont believe anyone has disputed that it did. Although I must admit that the story didnt ring true. You do have previous for making up stories on the forum.
however I am clearly playing a bit of a character and been silly.
What does this actually mean? Are you saying in the first half of the sentence that the story was true, and in the second half that you made it up? Are you regularly playing a part, and making up stories? I can vouch for the fact that you are regularly being silly, but not necessarily funny.
The thing is I am aware that I am a bit of a character myself,
Blowing your own trumpet is not usually a good thing. People often see themselves differently to how other people see them.
heck where ever I go people never forget me.
One girl on a sausage counter is not a big enough sample size to prove your case, and a couple of months is probably not a big enough timespan to prove "never".
There was a German sausage stall at the Christmas market in my town they did not come back until the summer. one of the girls working their mentioned she remembered me from Christmas how do I stand out that much?
People have stood out to me for all sorts of reasons. For example because they have been rude, particularly stupid, very fat, extremely thin, having a huge head, or a massive nose. Other people have impressed me because they are entertaining, interesting or funny, although this would be less likely after a 5 minute encounter.
they literally serve thousands of people a day and this is based of one five minute encounter?
How many thousand? What do you think made you stand out?
However sometimes I parody my own character and play it up for a sense of humor. I think a very large part of the sky poker community who read the forums recognize this.
What makes you say that? Any proof?
Yes I am more then aware that watching **** in public is not acceptable. I am aware that if I am paid to do a job watching **** during that time is unacceptable. Where as if I am self employed its not really anyone else's business what I do unless I am in public and certain social norms etc.
Well done. A very large part of the Sky Poker community may recognise you for stating the blindingly obvious in future, as well. Are there no limits to your talents?
You get so wound up over small things and take it so seriously. Trying to break down every single little point, like some sort of lawyer in a court room.
I am very calm, and dont get wound up very easily. Although I do take a dim view of people making stuff up, and representing it as the truth. If the forum was a court room, you would be getting more porridge than Boris Becker.
Dude I am just a guy that struggles to say stuff succinctly (still very worried about the grade for my statistics essay not got it back yet) and thinks differently to most people. I have been mocked for it harshly in the past and it used to get to me now I just have a laugh with it.
I havent a clue why you would think that this would have anything to do with the made up stuff that you post.
Its like you imagine some big drama or big fight on the forums and take it so seriously when in reality I am just posting comments casually.
I am merely debating the content of what you have posted.
You went off on like a 3 page tirade over one small tease thread I made.
I have never posted a 3 page tirade.
You take things far to seriously mate, maybe you just need to chillax a little.
What makes you think you are qualified, or even capable of offering any advice, to anyone?
As I have said earlier, I dont think that discussing child po rnography warrants any humour. It is something that, in my view, should be taken seriously at all times. I think you made up the story about the guy on the plane. It was a silly story, as you couldnt even come up with an ending. Not everything that is silly, is funny, sometimes things are just silly, and not funny, or memorable.
I have exams in two months, exams I am not ready for at the time of typing this. Whilst I do have some time to play poker and post here I do not have time to write a five book manuscript worth of responses back and forth to you. especially when it is about you taking things far too seriously and trying to twist a personal attack on me.
some people in the sky community do not like me most are indifferent and some like me. it is unlikely in discourse of me trying to defend myself against you trying to twist things to make me sound bad that peoples opinions will change, one or two might but not many.
I think debating with you is an utterly fruitless exercise and a huge waste of my valuable time which I cannot afford right now. I would have more success trying to preach evolution to creationists then I would debating anything about anything with you.
I think you take things far to seriously and likely need therapy.
I am sure many professional online poker players have at some point done this at work. The issue is that work would be in their own home in their own privacy.
Professional poker players are self employed, and are free to conduct their working day as they see fit. A Cabinet Minister is paid around £150k per year, funded by the tax payer. They therefore have a responsibility to do their jobs, rather than watching po rn when they are supposed to be working.
So the issue is not whether someone watched **** at work the issue is regarding watching **** in public.
The issue is that a CM whose wages are paid by the taxpayer, was caught watching po rn while he was supposed to be working, on more than one occasion. Secondly he was watching the po rn in view of a number of female colleagues.
I remember one time when I was on a plane and a women went ballistic about a guy allegedly watching ****, during the flight.
Why wouldnt she?
The flight attendants response rightly or wrongly was so what if he wants to do that. So then the women loudly claimed it was child **** and demanded they do something about it and suddenly the issue got more serious.
The flight attendant was clearly wrong. Watching any po rn within view of others is undoubtedly offensive. The possession of child po rnography is illegal, often results in offenders being jailed, and quite rightly so.
What the actual outcome of this was I will never know. this was on window seats and I was in the middle row a few rows back.
The seating was irrelevant.
The whole plane noticed this commotion though.
So the moral of all of this is, do not watch **** in public, but then again if you frequent kink clubs as some people I know have then people watch **** in groups there sometimes. However since everyone accepts there I guess its okay.
So really the moral is do not watch child **** ever, and do not watch **** in public unless it is at a kink club in which case it is okay.
The reason I worry about you is that you often seem unable to recognise the issues involved. I think that the fact that you were able to write the above is proof of this.
So why do you worry about me?
Okay I will go with this. Firstly the story about the plane did happen,
Why would you say that, when I dont believe anyone has disputed that it did. Although I must admit that the story didnt ring true. You do have previous for making up stories on the forum.
however I am clearly playing a bit of a character and been silly.
What does this actually mean? Are you saying in the first half of the sentence that the story was true, and in the second half that you made it up? Are you regularly playing a part, and making up stories? I can vouch for the fact that you are regularly being silly, but not necessarily funny.
The thing is I am aware that I am a bit of a character myself,
Blowing your own trumpet is not usually a good thing. People often see themselves differently to how other people see them.
heck where ever I go people never forget me.
One girl on a sausage counter is not a big enough sample size to prove your case, and a couple of months is probably not a big enough timespan to prove "never".
There was a German sausage stall at the Christmas market in my town they did not come back until the summer. one of the girls working their mentioned she remembered me from Christmas how do I stand out that much?
People have stood out to me for all sorts of reasons. For example because they have been rude, particularly stupid, very fat, extremely thin, having a huge head, or a massive nose. Other people have impressed me because they are entertaining, interesting or funny, although this would be less likely after a 5 minute encounter.
they literally serve thousands of people a day and this is based of one five minute encounter?
How many thousand? What do you think made you stand out?
However sometimes I parody my own character and play it up for a sense of humor. I think a very large part of the sky poker community who read the forums recognize this.
What makes you say that? Any proof?
Yes I am more then aware that watching **** in public is not acceptable. I am aware that if I am paid to do a job watching **** during that time is unacceptable. Where as if I am self employed its not really anyone else's business what I do unless I am in public and certain social norms etc.
Well done. A very large part of the Sky Poker community may recognise you for stating the blindingly obvious in future, as well. Are there no limits to your talents?
You get so wound up over small things and take it so seriously. Trying to break down every single little point, like some sort of lawyer in a court room.
I am very calm, and dont get wound up very easily. Although I do take a dim view of people making stuff up, and representing it as the truth. If the forum was a court room, you would be getting more porridge than Boris Becker.
Dude I am just a guy that struggles to say stuff succinctly (still very worried about the grade for my statistics essay not got it back yet) and thinks differently to most people. I have been mocked for it harshly in the past and it used to get to me now I just have a laugh with it.
I havent a clue why you would think that this would have anything to do with the made up stuff that you post.
Its like you imagine some big drama or big fight on the forums and take it so seriously when in reality I am just posting comments casually.
I am merely debating the content of what you have posted.
You went off on like a 3 page tirade over one small tease thread I made.
I have never posted a 3 page tirade.
You take things far to seriously mate, maybe you just need to chillax a little.
What makes you think you are qualified, or even capable of offering any advice, to anyone?
As I have said earlier, I dont think that discussing child po rnography warrants any humour. It is something that, in my view, should be taken seriously at all times. I think you made up the story about the guy on the plane. It was a silly story, as you couldnt even come up with an ending. Not everything that is silly, is funny, sometimes things are just silly, and not funny, or memorable.
I have exams in two months, exams I am not ready for at the time of typing this. Whilst I do have some time to play poker and post here I do not have time to write a five book manuscript worth of responses back and forth to you. especially when it is about you taking things far too seriously and trying to twist a personal attack on me.
some people in the sky community do not like me most are indifferent and some like me. it is unlikely in discourse of me trying to defend myself against you trying to twist things to make me sound bad that peoples opinions will change, one or two might but not many.
I think debating with you is an utterly fruitless exercise and a huge waste of my valuable time which I cannot afford right now. I would have more success trying to preach evolution to creationists then I would debating anything about anything with you.
I think you take things far to seriously and likely need therapy.
all the best I am done debating with you now.
Good luck with the sausage counter girl, and your adventure into ventriloquism.
I am sure many professional online poker players have at some point done this at work. The issue is that work would be in their own home in their own privacy.
Professional poker players are self employed, and are free to conduct their working day as they see fit. A Cabinet Minister is paid around £150k per year, funded by the tax payer. They therefore have a responsibility to do their jobs, rather than watching po rn when they are supposed to be working.
So the issue is not whether someone watched **** at work the issue is regarding watching **** in public.
The issue is that a CM whose wages are paid by the taxpayer, was caught watching po rn while he was supposed to be working, on more than one occasion. Secondly he was watching the po rn in view of a number of female colleagues.
I remember one time when I was on a plane and a women went ballistic about a guy allegedly watching ****, during the flight.
Why wouldnt she?
The flight attendants response rightly or wrongly was so what if he wants to do that. So then the women loudly claimed it was child **** and demanded they do something about it and suddenly the issue got more serious.
The flight attendant was clearly wrong. Watching any po rn within view of others is undoubtedly offensive. The possession of child po rnography is illegal, often results in offenders being jailed, and quite rightly so.
What the actual outcome of this was I will never know. this was on window seats and I was in the middle row a few rows back.
The seating was irrelevant.
The whole plane noticed this commotion though.
So the moral of all of this is, do not watch **** in public, but then again if you frequent kink clubs as some people I know have then people watch **** in groups there sometimes. However since everyone accepts there I guess its okay.
So really the moral is do not watch child **** ever, and do not watch **** in public unless it is at a kink club in which case it is okay.
The reason I worry about you is that you often seem unable to recognise the issues involved. I think that the fact that you were able to write the above is proof of this.
So why do you worry about me?
Okay I will go with this. Firstly the story about the plane did happen,
Why would you say that, when I dont believe anyone has disputed that it did. Although I must admit that the story didnt ring true. You do have previous for making up stories on the forum.
however I am clearly playing a bit of a character and been silly.
What does this actually mean? Are you saying in the first half of the sentence that the story was true, and in the second half that you made it up? Are you regularly playing a part, and making up stories? I can vouch for the fact that you are regularly being silly, but not necessarily funny.
The thing is I am aware that I am a bit of a character myself,
Blowing your own trumpet is not usually a good thing. People often see themselves differently to how other people see them.
heck where ever I go people never forget me.
One girl on a sausage counter is not a big enough sample size to prove your case, and a couple of months is probably not a big enough timespan to prove "never".
There was a German sausage stall at the Christmas market in my town they did not come back until the summer. one of the girls working their mentioned she remembered me from Christmas how do I stand out that much?
People have stood out to me for all sorts of reasons. For example because they have been rude, particularly stupid, very fat, extremely thin, having a huge head, or a massive nose. Other people have impressed me because they are entertaining, interesting or funny, although this would be less likely after a 5 minute encounter.
they literally serve thousands of people a day and this is based of one five minute encounter?
How many thousand? What do you think made you stand out?
However sometimes I parody my own character and play it up for a sense of humor. I think a very large part of the sky poker community who read the forums recognize this.
What makes you say that? Any proof?
Yes I am more then aware that watching **** in public is not acceptable. I am aware that if I am paid to do a job watching **** during that time is unacceptable. Where as if I am self employed its not really anyone else's business what I do unless I am in public and certain social norms etc.
Well done. A very large part of the Sky Poker community may recognise you for stating the blindingly obvious in future, as well. Are there no limits to your talents?
You get so wound up over small things and take it so seriously. Trying to break down every single little point, like some sort of lawyer in a court room.
I am very calm, and dont get wound up very easily. Although I do take a dim view of people making stuff up, and representing it as the truth. If the forum was a court room, you would be getting more porridge than Boris Becker.
Dude I am just a guy that struggles to say stuff succinctly (still very worried about the grade for my statistics essay not got it back yet) and thinks differently to most people. I have been mocked for it harshly in the past and it used to get to me now I just have a laugh with it.
I havent a clue why you would think that this would have anything to do with the made up stuff that you post.
Its like you imagine some big drama or big fight on the forums and take it so seriously when in reality I am just posting comments casually.
I am merely debating the content of what you have posted.
You went off on like a 3 page tirade over one small tease thread I made.
I have never posted a 3 page tirade.
You take things far to seriously mate, maybe you just need to chillax a little.
What makes you think you are qualified, or even capable of offering any advice, to anyone?
As I have said earlier, I dont think that discussing child po rnography warrants any humour. It is something that, in my view, should be taken seriously at all times. I think you made up the story about the guy on the plane. It was a silly story, as you couldnt even come up with an ending. Not everything that is silly, is funny, sometimes things are just silly, and not funny, or memorable.
I have exams in two months, exams I am not ready for at the time of typing this. Whilst I do have some time to play poker and post here I do not have time to write a five book manuscript worth of responses back and forth to you. especially when it is about you taking things far too seriously and trying to twist a personal attack on me.
some people in the sky community do not like me most are indifferent and some like me. it is unlikely in discourse of me trying to defend myself against you trying to twist things to make me sound bad that peoples opinions will change, one or two might but not many.
I think debating with you is an utterly fruitless exercise and a huge waste of my valuable time which I cannot afford right now. I would have more success trying to preach evolution to creationists then I would debating anything about anything with you.
I think you take things far to seriously and likely need therapy.
all the best I am done debating with you now.
Nerdy, nerdy, custard
I quite like debating stuff with @HAYSIE . Whether I agree or disagree.
It is of course true that it is impossible to outlast him in debate.
I don't think @Haysie needs therapy. I bet his wife (like mine) is sometimes tempted for herself
Revealed: Tory accused of watching **** in the House of Commons is Tiverton MP Neil Parish and he has reported himself to the Commons Standards watchdog
Neil Parish was today dramatically revealed as the Tory MP accused of watching **** in the Commons. The MP for Tiverton and Honiton has had the party whip suspended after finally being identified following days of fevered speculation. He has referred himself to the standards watchdog over allegations that he had been seen watching adult material in the House by two female colleagues. A spokeswoman for Chief Whip Chris Heaton-Harris said: 'Having spoken to the Chief Whip this afternoon, Neil Parish MP is reporting himself to the Standards Committee of the House of Commons. 'Mr Parish has been suspended from the Conservative Whip pending the outcome of that investigation.' It is understood a process has now been launched through Parliament's independent complaints and grievance scheme (ICGS). Mr Parish was asked about the situation when he was interviewed on GB News earlier this week, and said 'you are going to get people that step over the line'.
'I'm sorry you married a f*****g' idiot': Weeping **** probe Tory MP Neil Parish apologises to his 'very embarrassed' wife over claims he watched an x-rated video in the Commons - but he REFUSES to quit and she vows to stand by him
Neil Parish (pictured left), 65, was yesterday unmasked as the Tory accused by female colleagues earlier this week of viewing explicit content in Parliament on at least two occasions. A grandfather who has campaigned passionately for better rural broadband, he has now been stripped of the Tory whip and has referred himself to the MPs' Committee on Standards. He rejected calls to resign immediately, however, claiming that he had opened pornographic content on his phone 'in error'. He did not elaborate further. Sue (pictured left and right with her husband), his wife of 40 years who works as his secretary, indicated yesterday that she will stand by him. 'If you were mad with every man who looked at ****, you would not have many wives in the world,' she said. Mr Parish (pictured inset in the Commons) admitted that as reports emerged yesterday naming him as the MP in question, he was unable to contact his wife because his phone battery was flat. By the time he arrived home from a constituency surgery, Mrs Parish had already learned the news. Having reached their red-brick farmhouse in Stretcholt near Bridgwater, Somerset, Mr Parish broke down in tears and told her: 'I'm sorry you married a f****** idiot.'
Comments
As I have said earlier, I dont think that discussing child po rnography warrants any humour.
It is something that, in my view, should be taken seriously at all times.
I think you made up the story about the guy on the plane.
It was a silly story, as you couldnt even come up with an ending.
Not everything that is silly, is funny, sometimes things are just silly, and not funny, or memorable.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61276319?at_campaign=KARANGA&at_medium=RSS&curator=upstract.com
Neil Parish was today dramatically revealed as the Tory MP accused of watching **** in the Commons. The MP for Tiverton and Honiton has had the party whip suspended after finally being identified following days of fevered speculation. He has referred himself to the standards watchdog over allegations that he had been seen watching adult material in the House by two female colleagues. A spokeswoman for Chief Whip Chris Heaton-Harris said: 'Having spoken to the Chief Whip this afternoon, Neil Parish MP is reporting himself to the Standards Committee of the House of Commons. 'Mr Parish has been suspended from the Conservative Whip pending the outcome of that investigation.' It is understood a process has now been launched through Parliament's independent complaints and grievance scheme (ICGS). Mr Parish was asked about the situation when he was interviewed on GB News earlier this week, and said 'you are going to get people that step over the line'.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10767845/Tory-accused-watching-****-House-Commons-Tiverton-MP-Neil-Parish.html
some people in the sky community do not like me most are indifferent and some like me. it is unlikely in discourse of me trying to defend myself against you trying to twist things to make me sound bad that peoples opinions will change, one or two might but not many.
I think debating with you is an utterly fruitless exercise and a huge waste of my valuable time which I cannot afford right now. I would have more success trying to preach evolution to creationists then I would debating anything about anything with you.
I think you take things far to seriously and likely need therapy.
all the best I am done debating with you now.
I quite like debating stuff with @HAYSIE . Whether I agree or disagree.
It is of course true that it is impossible to outlast him in debate.
I don't think @Haysie needs therapy. I bet his wife (like mine) is sometimes tempted for herself
1 thing I agree with @HAYSIE
Sometimes, I worry about you.
https://video.dailymail.co.uk/preview/mol/2022/04/30/3001143896324325880/636x382_MP4_3001143896324325880.mp4
Neil Parish (pictured left), 65, was yesterday unmasked as the Tory accused by female colleagues earlier this week of viewing explicit content in Parliament on at least two occasions. A grandfather who has campaigned passionately for better rural broadband, he has now been stripped of the Tory whip and has referred himself to the MPs' Committee on Standards. He rejected calls to resign immediately, however, claiming that he had opened pornographic content on his phone 'in error'. He did not elaborate further. Sue (pictured left and right with her husband), his wife of 40 years who works as his secretary, indicated yesterday that she will stand by him. 'If you were mad with every man who looked at ****, you would not have many wives in the world,' she said. Mr Parish (pictured inset in the Commons) admitted that as reports emerged yesterday naming him as the MP in question, he was unable to contact his wife because his phone battery was flat. By the time he arrived home from a constituency surgery, Mrs Parish had already learned the news. Having reached their red-brick farmhouse in Stretcholt near Bridgwater, Somerset, Mr Parish broke down in tears and told her: 'I'm sorry you married a f****** idiot.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10769415/Teary-****-probe-Tory-MP-apologies-wife-claims-watched-x-rated-video-Commons.html
"claiming that he had opened pornographic content on his phone 'in error'."
Easily done, right?
"he was unable to contact his wife because his phone battery was flat".
Bit of a tap-in there.