Quote: You would need to win 20 straight HUSNG for a £40 cash.
Id won £40 on the freeroll. This is your comment. Winning 20 £1 HU games is not an equivalent of a £40 freeroll cash. 40 games is.
Is it? Where are these rake-free games you are playing?
Q I'm genuinely interested in: why do you think you are so averse to learning anything about probability? Do you see why that might be causing you to think the deal is faulty?
I recommend you play around with the pokerdope calculator, but I know the answer is "not interested".
Ahh but your poor example of 20 was rake free, i see..... makes perfect sense! All in all 40 is a lot closer than 20 for £40.... even though mine had rake and yours mysteriously didnt .....
I guess accountants make the figures fit any way they dictate
My decisions are all made on probability in poker... comparing it to dice or studying other odds is not relevant to me.
I do know if they are consistently hitting 1-4 outs on the river several times within one heads up game, the combined odds start to go crazy... My main decision on online poker was made on 888 poker, where i recorded 450+ hands were there was only one standard result, which has been discussed on a previous thread.
This can not be possible, everyone knows it is not possible.... and the only explanation on here was that i was a liar! What would you like me to deduce from something that happened that way, when the site didnt want to look into it?
I was a winner on there too, but that one situation deemed it untenable for me to carry on playing there.
Pretty sure you stated a few posts back 'I'm done' I really wish you would stick to that promise
He can't help himself .....'coz he's got no friends coming along to his 'Plastic Deck Poker Night' to endure listening to him..... so he just keeps ' WADDYing along on here '
Not sure how many different ways I can say I'm talking about gross revenue and you are talking about profit (and getting your numbers wrong). I agree that profit makes more sense.
Ultimately, you aren't smart enough to understand variance and you are unwilling to educate yourself. That kind of "don't know, don't care" approach to anything isn't going to serve you well in life. You should realise people responding to you are trying to help you, but you seem more intent on being fixated on the wrong things.
The player TheOcalot.... seriously checks when should bet, bets when he should check... bets max with showdown hands river and then shows, where hes only going to get a call if beat and was winning anyway.
Really easy game with a real deck. Online? Lucky to break 50% at best, just helps out whatever. So he calls here, when i semi bluff (he would bet just a jack with no kicker btw) and it looks basically like a freeroll for me... even if he backdoors a low, im getting half...
So what can it come up with for the guy trying to giveaway for 40mins already.... Absolutely typical end of game with this player, nothing you can do.....
Player
Action
Cards
Amount
Pot
Balance
TheWaddy
Small blind
100.00
100.00
990.00
THEOCALOT
Big blind
200.00
300.00
1710.00
Your hole cards
Q
Q
5
K
TheWaddy
Call
100.00
400.00
890.00
THEOCALOT
Check
Flop
10
J
6
THEOCALOT
Bet
400.00
800.00
1310.00
TheWaddy
All-in
890.00
1690.00
0.00
THEOCALOT
Call
490.00
2180.00
820.00
TheWaddy
Show
Q
Q
5
K
THEOCALOT
Show
4
7
Q
K
Turn
8
River
2
THEOCALOT
Win high
Flush to the King
1090.00
1910.00
THEOCALOT
Win low
8-low
1090.00
3000.00
Dont embarrass yourselves with play critisism, its 100/200 blinds, i have 890 left and i know the player and his range....
And 25min ago.... if you could maybe enlighten me as to when this DOES become unusual to you guys? I often ask people have you ever had a royal flush, straight flush. quads live... they may say 'i once had....'
Never have they said 'all of them in an absolute avalanche in the past few days'.....
You’re not very smart. You believe this site and others to be corrupt but bizarrely claim that’s not what you’re saying. Whereas the truth is that you’re playing £1 games. Players will make poor plays and sometimes they’ll get lucky. You’re marginally better than they are and so you win a little.
You totally fail to recognise that this is all great for you when they play less than optimally. Regardless of what you seem to believe they don’t always hit their ‘miracle’ river and you win.
Have you ever considered that when there is this weight of opinion differing from what you think that maybe, just maybe, they might be right?
It isn’t a tea club or a clique. It’s just people with a lot of experience who have seen your kind of posts a million times before and get exasperated.
This is just the quads I AM GETTING.... i mean how many have the opponents had too?
What did you say 37-1 that there is one every 52 hands?
Can i get a bet on these, i think i have asked previously.... errr no sir.... could i bet on the combined odds of getting like 3 in a row in 156 hands ... err definitely no to that one sir!
Anyway you would have to say this is quite amazing, regardless of your stance.
Comments
Id won £40 on the freeroll. This is your comment. Winning 20 £1 HU games is not an equivalent of a £40 freeroll cash. 40 games is.
Q I'm genuinely interested in: why do you think you are so averse to learning anything about probability? Do you see why that might be causing you to think the deal is faulty?
I recommend you play around with the pokerdope calculator, but I know the answer is "not interested".
I guess accountants make the figures fit any way they dictate
My decisions are all made on probability in poker... comparing it to dice or studying other odds is not relevant to me.
I do know if they are consistently hitting 1-4 outs on the river several times within one heads up game, the combined odds start to go crazy... My main decision on online poker was made on 888 poker, where i recorded 450+ hands were there was only one standard result, which has been discussed on a previous thread.
This can not be possible, everyone knows it is not possible.... and the only explanation on here was that i was a liar! What would you like me to deduce from something that happened that way, when the site didnt want to look into it?
I was a winner on there too, but that one situation deemed it untenable for me to carry on playing there.
I really wish you would stick to that promise
Ultimately, you aren't smart enough to understand variance and you are unwilling to educate yourself. That kind of "don't know, don't care" approach to anything isn't going to serve you well in life. You should realise people responding to you are trying to help you, but you seem more intent on being fixated on the wrong things.
Good luck at the tables.
Really easy game with a real deck. Online? Lucky to break 50% at best, just helps out whatever. So he calls here, when i semi bluff (he would bet just a jack with no kicker btw) and it looks basically like a freeroll for me... even if he backdoors a low, im getting half...
So what can it come up with for the guy trying to giveaway for 40mins already.... Absolutely typical end of game with this player, nothing you can do.....
Good players don't complain when they win....... so there. hic!
Never have they said 'all of them in an absolute avalanche in the past few days'.....
Can't you pop round to his Paul for a HUp MOAN Off ....... pleeeeeeeease
You’re not very smart. You believe this site and others to be corrupt but bizarrely claim that’s not what you’re saying.
Whereas the truth is that you’re playing £1 games. Players will make poor plays and sometimes they’ll get lucky. You’re marginally better than they are and so you win a little.
You totally fail to recognise that this is all great for you when they play less than optimally. Regardless of what you seem to believe they don’t always hit their ‘miracle’ river and you win.
Have you ever considered that when there is this weight of opinion differing from what you think that maybe, just maybe, they might be right?
It isn’t a tea club or a clique. It’s just people with a lot of experience who have seen your kind of posts a million times before and get exasperated.
What you think of this Rainman.... sorry... essexphil. Where are we oddswise;
What did you say 37-1 that there is one every 52 hands?
Can i get a bet on these, i think i have asked previously.... errr no sir.... could i bet on the combined odds of getting like 3 in a row in 156 hands ... err definitely no to that one sir!
Anyway you would have to say this is quite amazing, regardless of your stance.