I could try my own words and have said much of this sort of thing before myself but I cannot communicate it as well as this guy.
This guy is a true genius and says it perfectly
so will leave this video for people to find any flaw with (hint you wont)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV0s5pv8uVA
Comments
And the comments....clicking on the user names below makes a lot of sense.
@dozer1323
12 hours ago
I don't poison ants in my garden
They poison themselves by rejecting me
@memecity9849
13 hours ago
They say God is outside of space and time. You know what else is outside of space and time? Imaginary friends
It's nothing I haven't heard before, just the same message in a different package, with what I assume he thinks is a clever use of math.
You're a mathematician so here's one for you.
Scientists have acknowledged that the odds of creation being a purely random event are 10 to the power of 200.
Apparently, that equates to giving every man, woman and child a rubik cube, blindfolding them and then at a specific time telling them all to start, and every one solves it within 10 seconds.
My mind can't comprehend the enormity of that.
Also I like memecity9849's comment, which displays a common misconception that God is physical. God is metaphysical and therefore exists both inside and outside of time and space.
That's the point that all the Dawkins wannabes fail to recognise, they all look at God as a physical entity and therefore judge what they know based on the constraints of physicality.
Like all things it's something to think about.
What does Winnie think. ?
God doesn't wander around Dublin thinking he's Bono.
However, Dawkins is still recovering from the failure of the Hadron Collider to find evidence of the God Particle that so many atheists were pinning there hopes on. I believe that they are having a 3rd go this year.
A case once more of Science NOT disproving God.
So evolution is so evident that I am more convinced that evolution is true then I am that the world is a globe (note I am not a flat earther) I think any specific route in evolution will be very unlikely but taking that is disingenious its like been dealt 13 cards from a deck of 52 and saying once you have your hand that wow the odds of been dealt that specific hand are so unlikely, but you had to be dealt one specific hand there and you could say that about any specific hand there.
As far as I am aware at the time of writing this abiogenis is not yet known so putting odds on this would be redundant.
and as for the constants of the universe Its not just that I am too ignorant to give an answer to the odds of those constants the entire human race is, no one here yet fully understands the laws of the universe or why it is that way. Infact we are so far behind on that, to say no one fully understands is a misleading no one is even close to understand the 1% of that yet.
So with all that in mind I do not know how any serious scientists or sceintific consensus could possibly say odds of 10 to the power of 200 or any other odds. I would request a source for this.
All that been said something been incredibly unlikely or us not been able to explain it does not mean god. That just means we now have a very unlikely event that we cannot explain.
Whilst people joke about winni here, Some would argue that there would be more of a case to argue winni the pooh been the creator of everything then the Abrahamic god been the creator of everything. They wouldn't seriously be advocating for Winni been our creator more claiming that the Abrahamic god is not a good explanation.
However this video was talking about the absurdity of having a relationship with god not whether god does or does not exist. although yes Darkmatter2525 is an atheist.
an Ancient Alien with magic power or a stone mason.......
Theologists do not deny the big bang. genesis tells us that, that is how it all started. we simply dispute the fact that the bang was a natural event.
Also if he is the Priest how can he be the victim of a nonce Priest. Do you ever read what you write .