In Response to Re: Nick Pryce, New Blog 30th May : I think we're disagreeing on a technical point here. My personal opinion is that having a link to another site on a page does not bring the contents here unless you misrepresent it. If I claim a link is to some pictures of kittens and it's a link to naked ladies then that is wrong. Nick has always said it is a link to a blog and it is pretty much understood that a blog will always be personal opinion. And the fact you can comment there means the subject, in my view, stays there and should be discussed there. However I completely respect that you take a different view on this matter and my Mod opinion is fully supporting taking down the link until a decision is made on it. Posted by TommyD
In Response to Re: Nick Pryce, New Blog 30th May : As I said clutching at straws. Posted by elsadog
If you are implying that as a Mod I am lying when I say I do not know everyone who has bans, account removal etc then I am personally hurt by this. You overestimate my importance and power, I have no idea about any ban in this matter.
I am trying to be open minded here but you are missing points, interpreting points in a manner I really can't understand and giving me vague one line negative replies. Personally I've always liked and respected you, I just feel that while we are taking different points in a debate I am trying to see where you are coming from but you have very little interest in trying the same for me.
ya i liked michael jackson until the kiddies started telling their parents some dodgy stuff that was going on at neverland ranch. i wish they would have kept their mouths shut
its like michael jackosn i love hes music and i rmemeber him for hes music tbh i dont give 2 hoots about hes past each to there own just some things are best unsaid Posted by IDONKCALLU
its like michael jackosn i love hes music and i rmemeber him for hes music tbh i dont give 2 hoots about hes past each to there own just some things are best unsaid Posted by IDONKCALLU
its like michael jackosn i love hes music and i rmemeber him for hes music tbh i dont give 2 hoots about hes past each to there own just some things are best unsaid Posted by IDONKCALLU
This wins the prize for the worst reply ever mate lol
its like michael jackosn i love hes music and i rmemeber him for hes music tbh i dont give 2 hoots about hes past each to there own just some things are best unsaid Posted by IDONKCALLU
This is why you must start a diary IDCU. I don't care if you never mention poker in it, It would still be the first thread I open! Unreal!
----------------------
Quality thread/s btw, very entertaining
I rate/d Ed v highly as an analyst. I'm sure I read in the first thread that Nick did also.
My opinion of Ed will remain the same until he gives me reason to change it. Nick has every right to give his own thoughts on his own blog, and then promote it. Ed has every right to reply as he sees fit, wether it be on here, or the blog itself. I don't see the problem.
I'm sure neither party will lose too much sleep over the whole thing, not sure the same can be said about the people stressing over forum/moderation rules though.
its like michael jackosn i love hes music and i rmemeber him for hes music tbh i dont give 2 hoots about hes past each to there own just some things are best unsaid Posted by IDONKCALLU
I sense this thread may be heading in a new direction and closed, its ok to be paedophile so long as u sing Shamon a lot and grab your crotch Posted by Oopnorth
Hahaha!! This thread is ridiculous. OTT or what! These mods are hilarious!
What a silly thread, come on you guys you are supposed to be adults Reads like a squabble in a playground
Nick had a bad experience with total player and Ed could not give enough time to it
so what ! Hardly crime of the century is it - maybe you should read the news or something because 6 kids died in a house fire and their parents have been arrested and charged with murder !
Perpestive!
seriously though Nick, at the time you should of just complained to SKY about the lack of support you got from Ed - maybe if you did then it may have turned out to be a better experience for you
What a silly thread, come on you guys you are supposed to be adults Reads like a squabble in a playground Nick had a bad experience with total player and Ed could not give enough time to it so what ! Hardly crime of the century is it - maybe you should read the news or something because 6 kids died in a house fire and their parents have been arrested and charged with murder ! Perpestive! seriously though Nick, at the time you should of just complained to SKY about the lack of support you got from Ed - maybe if you did then it may have turned out to be a better experience for you Life's full of dissapointment ! Posted by rancid
+1
WTF!!! at some of other comments, some funny, some just plain Stoooopid!
loving the Michael Jackson anology!!
But really Nick, did you not think you would get this type of reaction with those comments on Ed, rest of blog was excellent tbf!!
Maybe a few people were looking to jump down your throat after suffering sarcastic & condescending comments in the chat box, spose what goes round comes around!!
Nick & I have had our moments, then we have chatted & come to a level of understanding!!
He has the time & talent to improve his Poker, some, like me, DO Not, we are Grinding Jobs & Family in The Real World, and it's a s.hit I tell ya at moment!!
One thing I learned, fighting ma way out of The White City Ghetto, is be nice when you can, respect those around you, give all a chance, then, if forced, if you have to.....Act Firm & fast & Never be beaten!!
Nick IS a great player, maybe lessons can be learned here......for all
[I await & expect sarcastic & condescending reply....or maybe not this time]
Michael Jackson was found not guilty of ALL criminal charges bought against him relating to children. Michael Jackson was LEGALLY innocent of ALL accusations made against him. The law is very clear and concise on the matter of cyber libel. Comments posted on this thread IMO have broken these laws for the following reasons:
1- They have been made on a public forum (To A Third Party) that is moderated. A member of the moderation team have openly posted Before AND After the defamatory posts therefore leaving the reader in no doubt that these views/thoughts are "Ok" and are acceptable to Sky.
2- The statement openly mentioned by name a person (A person to whom there can be little ambiguity) and alluded to situations from that persons past that have been resolved but left the reader with a negative insight bordering on accusations of criminal activity.
3- The statement is defamatory and discredits the persons legacy and seriously damages the reputation of the continued Business/Trademarked Name.
4- The person in question (In my knowledge) never played poker, wrote a wordpress poker based blog OR coached Under 8's Cricket so their inclusion in this post is generally NOT VALID or needed and Sky are leaving themselves open to prosecution for allowing this thread to remain.
As a fan of Mr. Jackson I can only add that this thread has caused me undue distress and upset.
ok i have not posted on the forum for a long long time...is it any wonder but i have to speak about this post not about the opinions i love opinions.nicks blog is good and the replies are interesting..except elsadogs he is just a silly lonely little WUM who needs to get out more...
My point of coming on to post is that i actually no ED have done for years since he was playing cricket down the road at hove,plus he went out with my cousin for a bit..NOT ON FACEBOOK ACTUALLY IN REAL LIFE....
have spoken to him about this whole thing, he said that those opinions were not his,although he agreed with a lot of them.He said that nobody went onto that blog on his behalf because quite simply he would of replied himself if he felt the need....I dont think he cares a bit what nick says about him,i mean you guys know him a bit if he had a problem do you really think he would hide behind someone else's profile...NO of course not he would post it himself..
Nick blog is good it is about many a thing not just Ed and as i said the man himself does not feel it worthy of mentioning so why do you elsadog...
you are a liar as i have just proved so crawl back under your rock you petty man!!!!
ok i have not posted on the forum for a long long time...is it any wonder but i have to speak about this post not about the opinions i love opinions.nicks blog is good and the replies are interesting..except elsadogs he is just a silly lonely little WUM who needs to get out more... My point of coming on to post is that i actually no ED have done for years since he was playing cricket down the road at hove,plus he went out with my cousin for a bit..NOT ON FACEBOOK ACTUALLY IN REAL LIFE.... have spoken to him about this whole thing, he said that those opinions were not his,although he agreed with a lot of them.He said that nobody went onto that blog on his behalf because quite simply he would of replied himself if he felt the need....I dont think he cares a bit what nick says about him,i mean you guys know him a bit if he had a problem do you really think he would hide behind someone else's profile...NO of course not he would post it himself.. Nick blog is good it is about many a thing not just Ed and as i said the man himself does not feel it worthy of mentioning so why do you elsadog... you are a liar as i have just proved so crawl back under your rock you petty man!!!! Posted by jesusdog22
I never even knew you could "Go out with someone on Facebook" ..... That Zuckerbergs thought of everything hasnt he... *Sighs
To be honest, it's completely baffled me that any debate is happening here, a few points to remember...
1. Nick is essentially writing a life story of how he went from a complete noob to pro. Would you expect say Paul Gascoigne to write an autobiography and leave out the 'bad bits'. I think it's been included in the blog because he saw it as a major event (not necessarily a good one) in his progression and so must be included.
2. Nick is not writing his diary/blog on the forum, he is merely making it available to people who may not follow him on twitter etc. As with anything, if you don't like it, don't read it. There is nothing at all in Nick's link that would suggest there is anything derogatory in there.
P.S. IDonk, your last few comments and ludicrous lol. I know what ya trying to say, and it's like the old thing people say about 'don't meet your heroes', but sometimes it's just the way it is. I usually get laughed at for this, but Arnold Schwarzenegger is a hero of mine for many reasons. I heard about his house-maid thing, but it didn't take away from the aspects of his character that I really respect.
ok i have not posted on the forum for a long long time...is it any wonder but i have to speak about this post not about the opinions i love opinions.nicks blog is good and the replies are interesting..except elsadogs he is just a silly lonely little WUM who needs to get out more... My point of coming on to post is that i actually no ED have done for years since he was playing cricket down the road at hove,plus he went out with my cousin for a bit..NOT ON FACEBOOK ACTUALLY IN REAL LIFE.... have spoken to him about this whole thing, he said that those opinions were not his,although he agreed with a lot of them.He said that nobody went onto that blog on his behalf because quite simply he would of replied himself if he felt the need....I dont think he cares a bit what nick says about him,i mean you guys know him a bit if he had a problem do you really think he would hide behind someone else's profile...NO of course not he would post it himself.. Nick blog is good it is about many a thing not just Ed and as i said the man himself does not feel it worthy of mentioning so why do you elsadog... you are a liar as i have just proved so crawl back under your rock you petty man!!!! Posted by jesusdog22
What a load of old tosh this is. Myself and a number of others had an FB chat with Ed last night. He's a member of a group of players and has been for sometime and expressed his concerns about the fact that the blog was being promoted on the Sky forum and he had no right of reply.
I will say no more on this until I have spoken to Ed. I haven't so far spoken on his behalf (something you appear to be doing Jdog) and wouldn't wish to without his permission.
Suffice to say that Jdogs post is complete made-up tripe.
Comments
never noticed this, thank you Tommy
I am trying to be open minded here but you are missing points, interpreting points in a manner I really can't understand and giving me vague one line negative replies. Personally I've always liked and respected you, I just feel that while we are taking different points in a debate I am trying to see where you are coming from but you have very little interest in trying the same for me.
This wins the prize for the worst reply ever mate lol
Reads like a squabble in a playground
Nick had a bad experience with total player and Ed could not give enough time to it
so what ! Hardly crime of the century is it - maybe you should read the news or something because 6 kids died in a house fire and their parents have been arrested and charged with murder !
Perpestive!
seriously though Nick, at the time you should of just complained to SKY about the lack of support you got from Ed - maybe if you did then it may have turned out to be a better experience for you
Life's full of dissapointment !
WTF!!! at some of other comments, some funny, some just plain Stoooopid!
loving the Michael Jackson anology!!
But really Nick, did you not think you would get this type of reaction with those comments on Ed, rest of blog was excellent tbf!!
Maybe a few people were looking to jump down your throat after suffering sarcastic & condescending comments in the chat box, spose what goes round comes around!!
Nick & I have had our moments, then we have chatted & come to a level of understanding!!
He has the time & talent to improve his Poker, some, like me, DO Not, we are Grinding Jobs & Family in The Real World, and it's a s.hit I tell ya at moment!!
One thing I learned, fighting ma way out of The White City Ghetto, is be nice when you can, respect those around you, give all a chance, then, if forced, if you have to.....Act Firm & fast & Never be beaten!!
Nick IS a great player, maybe lessons can be learned here......for all
[I await & expect sarcastic & condescending reply....or maybe not this time]
I Think a few of us should take a deep breath & a good look at ourselves!!
....Otherwise what has been a shining star for most of us, could start to fade & Die!!
That Shining Star has been this forum!!
Michael Jackson was found not guilty of ALL criminal charges bought against him relating to children. Michael Jackson was LEGALLY innocent of ALL accusations made against him. The law is very clear and concise on the matter of cyber libel. Comments posted on this thread IMO have broken these laws for the following reasons:
1- They have been made on a public forum (To A Third Party) that is moderated. A member of the moderation team have openly posted Before AND After the defamatory posts therefore leaving the reader in no doubt that these views/thoughts are "Ok" and are acceptable to Sky.
2- The statement openly mentioned by name a person (A person to whom there can be little ambiguity) and alluded to situations from that persons past that have been resolved but left the reader with a negative insight bordering on accusations of criminal activity.
3- The statement is defamatory and discredits the persons legacy and seriously damages the reputation of the continued Business/Trademarked Name.
4- The person in question (In my knowledge) never played poker, wrote a wordpress poker based blog OR coached Under 8's Cricket so their inclusion in this post is generally NOT VALID or needed and Sky are leaving themselves open to prosecution for allowing this thread to remain.
As a fan of Mr. Jackson I can only add that this thread has caused me undue distress and upset.
My point of coming on to post is that i actually no ED have done for years since he was playing cricket down the road at hove,plus he went out with my cousin for a bit..NOT ON FACEBOOK ACTUALLY IN REAL LIFE....
have spoken to him about this whole thing, he said that those opinions were not his,although he agreed with a lot of them.He said that nobody went onto that blog on his behalf because quite simply he would of replied himself if he felt the need....I dont think he cares a bit what nick says about him,i mean you guys know him a bit if he had a problem do you really think he would hide behind someone else's profile...NO of course not he would post it himself..
Nick blog is good it is about many a thing not just Ed and as i said the man himself does not feel it worthy of mentioning so why do you elsadog...
you are a liar as i have just proved so crawl back under your rock you petty man!!!!
1. Nick is essentially writing a life story of how he went from a complete noob to pro. Would you expect say Paul Gascoigne to write an autobiography and leave out the 'bad bits'. I think it's been included in the blog because he saw it as a major event (not necessarily a good one) in his progression and so must be included.
2. Nick is not writing his diary/blog on the forum, he is merely making it available to people who may not follow him on twitter etc. As with anything, if you don't like it, don't read it. There is nothing at all in Nick's link that would suggest there is anything derogatory in there.
P.S. IDonk, your last few comments and ludicrous lol. I know what ya trying to say, and it's like the old thing people say about 'don't meet your heroes', but sometimes it's just the way it is. I usually get laughed at for this, but Arnold Schwarzenegger is a hero of mine for many reasons. I heard about his house-maid thing, but it didn't take away from the aspects of his character that I really respect.
What a load of old tosh this is. Myself and a number of others had an FB chat with Ed last night. He's a member of a group of players and has been for sometime and expressed his concerns about the fact that the blog was being promoted on the Sky forum and he had no right of reply.
I will say no more on this until I have spoken to Ed. I haven't so far spoken on his behalf (something you appear to be doing Jdog) and wouldn't wish to without his permission.
Suffice to say that Jdogs post is complete made-up tripe.