One last point regarding players(particularly losing ones). Be wary how literally sharkscope is interpreted. I know my own omits a couple of tournaments where ive made a profit and includes a 400 pounds win in a UKOPS semi which then creates the massive downswing on my graph. This was an entry fee to play at dtd which i never attended so how this is viewed as a loss is confusing. The 80 quid i won when i qualified for the manchester SPT the other week doesnt show neither the 220 entry fee which wasnt used. Whats the diff? Just be wary of labelling people losing players if thats the level of accuracy on peoples beloved sharkscope.
im not getting into the same old debates again it achieves nothing. Ive said what i said ive accepted i was wrong yet people still want to come on and repeat the same things theyve already said.
Maybe look on the bright side eh? Look at the fun people have had and the,still ongoing,discussion that has arisen from it? I did suggest deleting the thread however this was ignored. Tikay considering you claim to be all about positivity you seem **** bent on reiterating the negative points from the OP even though apologies were issued.
Ill stick this here in case it gets sabotaged again.
Thanks mumsie.
Just so everyone knows, with this new forum software, it records all original, amended or deleted posts, they may disappear from public view, but I can still view them via the Moderator Dashboard.
When posting, everyone should remember that deleting or editing a post does not erase the record. The internet is not written in pencil, once you post something, it's always there, forever.
One last point regarding players(particularly losing ones). Be wary how literally sharkscope is interpreted. I know my own omits a couple of tournaments where ive made a profit and includes a 400 pounds win in a UKOPS semi which then creates the massive downswing on my graph. This was an entry fee to play at dtd which i never attended so how this is viewed as a loss is confusing. The 80 quid i won when i qualified for the manchester SPT the other week doesnt show neither the 220 entry fee which wasnt used. Whats the diff? Just be wary of labelling people losing players if thats the level of accuracy on peoples beloved sharkscope.
Rather than specifically refer to you I was making a generalisation that the players who question the integrity of the RNG are often losing/breakeven players/small winning/winning live players who cannot transition to online (normally because standard in online is a lot tougher at comparable stakes). Sharkscope gives a decent indication of a players SNG/MTT ability and also shows how experience the player is at online MTT/SNG (at least on that site). It doesn't matter that it isn't 100% accurate as long as you use it for an indication for sorts of games someone plays/results they have.
One last point regarding players(particularly losing ones). Be wary how literally sharkscope is interpreted. I know my own omits a couple of tournaments where ive made a profit and includes a 400 pounds win in a UKOPS semi which then creates the massive downswing on my graph. This was an entry fee to play at dtd which i never attended so how this is viewed as a loss is confusing. The 80 quid i won when i qualified for the manchester SPT the other week doesnt show neither the 220 entry fee which wasnt used. Whats the diff? Just be wary of labelling people losing players if thats the level of accuracy on peoples beloved sharkscope.
Rather than specifically refer to you I was making a generalisation that the players who question the integrity of the RNG are often losing/breakeven players/small winning/winning live players who cannot transition to online (normally because standard in online is a lot tougher at comparable stakes). Sharkscope gives a decent indication of a players SNG/MTT ability and also shows how experience the player is at online MTT/SNG (at least on that site). It doesn't matter that it isn't 100% accurate as long as you use it for an indication for sorts of games someone plays/results they have.
One last point regarding players(particularly losing ones). Be wary how literally sharkscope is interpreted. I know my own omits a couple of tournaments where ive made a profit and includes a 400 pounds win in a UKOPS semi which then creates the massive downswing on my graph. This was an entry fee to play at dtd which i never attended so how this is viewed as a loss is confusing. The 80 quid i won when i qualified for the manchester SPT the other week doesnt show neither the 220 entry fee which wasnt used. Whats the diff? Just be wary of labelling people losing players if thats the level of accuracy on peoples beloved sharkscope.
Rather than specifically refer to you I was making a generalisation that the players who question the integrity of the RNG are often losing/breakeven players/small winning/winning live players who cannot transition to online (normally because standard in online is a lot tougher at comparable stakes). Sharkscope gives a decent indication of a players SNG/MTT ability and also shows how experience the player is at online MTT/SNG (at least on that site). It doesn't matter that it isn't 100% accurate as long as you use it for an indication for sorts of games someone plays/results they have.
I would prefer you didn't sharkscope me Matt... don't want you having any edge on me
I have SC'd you though, which confirmed me thoughts.... haha
Comments
have you given a thought to no surprise check on R.N.G. like Olympic drug testing. ?
If I knew you we coming I'd of baked a cake.
Oft course not wishing to stir anything.
Just so everyone knows, with this new forum software, it records all original, amended or deleted posts, they may disappear from public view, but I can still view them via the Moderator Dashboard.
When posting, everyone should remember that deleting or editing a post does not erase the record. The internet is not written in pencil, once you post something, it's always there, forever.
Sharkscope gives a decent indication of a players SNG/MTT ability and also shows how experience the player is at online MTT/SNG (at least on that site). It doesn't matter that it isn't 100% accurate as long as you use it for an indication for sorts of games someone plays/results they have.
yep, story checks out.
I have SC'd you though, which confirmed me thoughts.... haha