You had about 10 posts total since 2009 before jumping in on the Brexit thread (despite not voting and not willing to share your views) and on here (despite not being a TR fan, supposedly)
So, welcome out of the woodwork.
Thanks for the warm welcome and can i also point out that I'm married and you should probably be stalking someone your own age .
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you had taken the time to read the thread , you would have seen me clearly say I'm not a TR fan , and i'm female , not a boy. Have you read @Tikay10 's post on general chat regarding trolling within this thread ?
You seem happy that TOMMY might be in trouble, rather than the welfare of the 2 Children involved in the bullying incident.
I'm delighted that the reprehensible TR will hopefully be held accountable for his actions.
Did Tommeh care about the welfare of one of the children involved when he was spreading lies about him and pathetically attempting to link him to ISIS?
Ok so you only care about TOMMY being prosecuted and not the welfare of the Children involved.
Yes Rainman, that's exactly how I feel.
(obv its not, but it's futile with you cos you'll only put some absurd spin on it)
Here's a novel thought then , if given the opportunity to express that you are concerned about the welfare of the children , why wouldn;t you do that ? Mystic meg isn't on the forum .
In the same way that you and Rainman were afforded multiple opportunities to express your disgust at the Grenfell Tower effigy idiots but declined on every occasion?
Thought i would repost day4eire post. He or a friend of his thought it was racist to be opposed to the barbaric torture of animals for religious purposes.
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you had taken the time to read the thread , you would have seen me clearly say I'm not a TR fan , and i'm female , not a boy. Have you read @Tikay10 's post on general chat regarding trolling within this thread ?
You claim this, but a lot of your language and rhetoric suggests otherwise. All the 'back slapping' posts with Rainman certainly suggest a similar thought process to him.
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you had taken the time to read the thread , you would have seen me clearly say I'm not a TR fan , and i'm female , not a boy. Have you read @Tikay10 's post on general chat regarding trolling within this thread ?
You claim this, but a lot of your language and rhetoric suggests otherwise. All the 'back slapping' posts with Rainman certainly suggest a similar thought process to him.
2 peas in a pod.
Suggests to you maybe . I can agree with for instance , a tory voter on a lot of things without being a tory ....sound familiar ?
You seem happy that TOMMY might be in trouble, rather than the welfare of the 2 Children involved in the bullying incident.
I'm delighted that the reprehensible TR will hopefully be held accountable for his actions.
Did Tommeh care about the welfare of one of the children involved when he was spreading lies about him and pathetically attempting to link him to ISIS?
Ok so you only care about TOMMY being prosecuted and not the welfare of the Children involved.
Yes Rainman, that's exactly how I feel.
(obv its not, but it's futile with you cos you'll only put some absurd spin on it)
Here's a novel thought then , if given the opportunity to express that you are concerned about the welfare of the children , why wouldn;t you do that ? Mystic meg isn't on the forum .
In the same way that you and Rainman were afforded multiple opportunities to express your disgust at the Grenfell Tower effigy idiots but declined on every occasion?
Despite trying to get this thread back to being reasoned , there will always be a faction of people who don't want it that way . As the above poster proves .
I will give Rainman one thing he is willing to stand by his beliefs.
You have defended the two SYL fanboys here and attacked every other poster so given the evidence to hand it seems safe to say you are a SYL fanboy/fangirl
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you had taken the time to read the thread , you would have seen me clearly say I'm not a TR fan , and i'm female , not a boy. Have you read @Tikay10 's post on general chat regarding trolling within this thread ?
I will give Rainman one thing he is willing to stand by his beliefs.
You have defended the two SYL fanboys here and attacked every other poster so given the evidence to hand it seems safe to say you are a SYL fanboy/fangirl
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you had taken the time to read the thread , you would have seen me clearly say I'm not a TR fan , and i'm female , not a boy. Have you read @Tikay10 's post on general chat regarding trolling within this thread ?
I will give Rainman one thing he is willing to stand by his beliefs.
You have defended the two SYL fanboys here and attacked every other poster so given the evidence to hand it seems safe to say you are a SYL fanboy/fangirl
If you've read the thread , then you will know quite well , If I have something to say , then I do . I've seen already what your attitude is towards young children , so have concluded that I don't really have any reason to talk to you further.
If you had taken the time to read the thread , you would have seen me clearly say I'm not a TR fan , and i'm female , not a boy. Have you read @Tikay10 's post on general chat regarding trolling within this thread ?
Comments
If you have something to say just say it as the below doesn't make much sense.
The bolded bit is so far out of order but not a surprise.
Would you like to clarify the bolded bit "young children" and explain to me what exactly you are insinuating.
I think having his life threatened and his families is probably too extreme a lesson
A sarcastic and cynical attempt to suggest theres only 1 victim in this whole sorry story
So 16 is according to you is a young child ? Pathetic attempt to insinuate much worse.
He or a friend of his thought it was racist to be opposed to the barbaric torture of animals for religious purposes.
2 peas in a pod.
Sarcastic and cynical maybe I have just responded to you the way you have responded to every post questioning SYL .
You have defended the two SYL fanboys here and attacked every other poster so given the evidence to hand it seems safe to say you are a SYL fanboy/fangirl
Pretty clear what I am saying
Do you not find him repulsive like me ?