Non-doms are the Amazons of the personal tax world.
The fact is that our multi-millionaire Chancellor ensures his multi-multi-millionaire wife avoids paying UK tax on the vast bulk of her wealth while telling us to tighten our belts, and refusing to help.
Non-doms are the Amazons of the personal tax world.
The fact is that our multi-millionaire Chancellor ensures his multi-multi-millionaire wife avoids paying UK tax on the vast bulk of her wealth while telling us to tighten our belts, and refusing to help.
In the name of God, vote out these sleazeballs.
Do you think they are too stupid to see the message it sends, or is it that they simply dont care?
Non-doms are the Amazons of the personal tax world.
The fact is that our multi-millionaire Chancellor ensures his multi-multi-millionaire wife avoids paying UK tax on the vast bulk of her wealth while telling us to tighten our belts, and refusing to help.
In the name of God, vote out these sleazeballs.
Do you think they are too stupid to see the message it sends, or is it that they simply dont care?
Both. Definitely both.
As I have said on other threads, non-doms use a variety of (perfectly legal) devices in order to ensure that "income" is not classed as "UK income".
As an example of the avoidance, she invests in various companies. On just 1 of them (Infosys) she is believed to have received dividends of £11.7 million last year. UK tax on that? £0
I believe everyone should have the right to choose where they live. And where their domicile for tax purposes should be.
Non-doms are the Amazons of the personal tax world.
The fact is that our multi-millionaire Chancellor ensures his multi-multi-millionaire wife avoids paying UK tax on the vast bulk of her wealth while telling us to tighten our belts, and refusing to help.
In the name of God, vote out these sleazeballs.
Do you think they are too stupid to see the message it sends, or is it that they simply dont care?
Both. Definitely both.
As I have said on other threads, non-doms use a variety of (perfectly legal) devices in order to ensure that "income" is not classed as "UK income".
As an example of the avoidance, she invests in various companies. On just 1 of them (Infosys) she is believed to have received dividends of £11.7 million last year. UK tax on that? £0
I believe everyone should have the right to choose where they live. And where their domicile for tax purposes should be.
But they should be the same country.
I wouldnt disagree with that.
They are also kicking off this morning about another of the companies that she is involved with, that has now gone through, receiving over £400k in furlough cash.
Comments
I'd prefer Johnson to Truss, Mordaunt, Javid or Priti Patel.
Suspect anyone I wouldn't mind is not far Right enough to have much of a chance. The days of a Ken Clarke or Amber Rudd are long gone.
Hunt? Raab? Even Gove? Yes-the choice is that bad...
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newslondon/partygate-fiasco-grows-as-second-minister-admits-law-was-broken/ar-AAVGPLN?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=61f8c7f24e044cdb9f879084a06b161a
Is that it?
I seem to remember people getting £200 fines for meeting on a park bench.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10679935/Married-Tory-MP-whip-suspended-caught-secret-tape-sting.html
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/not-the-time-for-self-indulgent-leadership-contest-if-pm-is-fined-over-partygate-minister-says/ar-AAVPtOS?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=3114501cebdf4deab7abeb9df7d79b16
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/rishi-sunak-s-wife-says-she-pays-all-uk-taxes-after-non-dom-status-revealed/ar-AAVW74C?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=93188d9182094d22a1bc0a3af9b5626b
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/senior-tory-says-shapps-privately-assured-him-3bn-hs2-branch-will-be-scrapped/ar-AAVVLvK?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=14641b862e624a50b2ac4e02718cbf44
Non-doms are the Amazons of the personal tax world.
The fact is that our multi-millionaire Chancellor ensures his multi-multi-millionaire wife avoids paying UK tax on the vast bulk of her wealth while telling us to tighten our belts, and refusing to help.
In the name of God, vote out these sleazeballs.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/shine-is-coming-off-rishi-sunak-and-revelations-about-his-wife-s-taxes-won-t-help/ar-AAVWbnd?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=12bdeb95382645eaaf819ea9b471c5cf
Definitely both.
As I have said on other threads, non-doms use a variety of (perfectly legal) devices in order to ensure that "income" is not classed as "UK income".
As an example of the avoidance, she invests in various companies. On just 1 of them (Infosys) she is believed to have received dividends of £11.7 million last year. UK tax on that? £0
I believe everyone should have the right to choose where they live. And where their domicile for tax purposes should be.
But they should be the same country.
They are also kicking off this morning about another of the companies that she is involved with, that has now gone through, receiving over £400k in furlough cash.