Here we have another ol' mate 'HIfi'... blasts every hand, doesnt budge from it... so real deck it would be easy to wait at low blinds, to hit a flop knowing 100% he is betting it max... a flat call will ensure a turn max bet out of position and then you can all in, knowing there is just 1 card to come.
Its not so easy online, due to the high level of simply not allowing cheap giveaways.
You would have to admit, the sheer amount is amazing, even if you stupidly thought it was happening completely randomly. Ahh its because you see more hands online... i think this was hand number 7 for the day
Here’s another thought - mathematics and statistics do not and are not based on luck or affected by any other factors but need a sufficient sample size to ensure results are distributed fairly.
Once u have that sample size u can “prove” said findings.
I am also sure u would have played on other sites and not just Sky. Before u say you cannot do that. -
Final thought they reckon The definition of a fool is someone who does the same thing over and over again expecting different results.
Ahh but i have previously asked sites to hand my games to the auditor, to provide me an in depth analysis. They said no.
I think as this would reveal auditors dont really test on a poker odds type analysis and that its purely how often each card comes out, it is not possible to complete my request even if they wanted to.
This is just a guess to why they would say no, as whe ive asked eCogra for example to elaborate on what the actual testing involves... but they refused to answer.
This behaviour obviously just leads to the individual having to decipher for themselves to why a company that boasts 'award winning software', refuses to say exactly what it does.....
Then whenever you get in a situation where a player is simply trying to 'giveaway for free', it doesnt allow it. What would most intelligent people think about that? Im only human.
Comments
Its not so easy online, due to the high level of simply not allowing cheap giveaways.
Let’s see what the findings say
Oh wait that may be to sensible 🤔🤔🤔
Once u have that sample size u can “prove” said findings.
I am also sure u would have played on other sites and not just Sky. Before u say you cannot do that. -
Final thought they reckon The definition of a fool is someone who does the same thing over and over again expecting different results.
I think as this would reveal auditors dont really test on a poker odds type analysis and that its purely how often each card comes out, it is not possible to complete my request even if they wanted to.
This is just a guess to why they would say no, as whe ive asked eCogra for example to elaborate on what the actual testing involves... but they refused to answer.
This behaviour obviously just leads to the individual having to decipher for themselves to why a company that boasts 'award winning software', refuses to say exactly what it does.....
Then whenever you get in a situation where a player is simply trying to 'giveaway for free', it doesnt allow it. What would most intelligent people think about that? Im only human.
£1 HUp Hi/Lo
in CasinosThat's some memory you have Sean.
For a bonus point, give us the name of another of his big hits, ideally one which never found favour with milkmen.